What will we do for Carbon , for life and plant growth?

[chuckChuck]

Nice try bread. Try coming up with a credible counter argument on human caused climate change!

Many farmers are concerned about the environment but many don't care much and will criticize every little move to protect the environment.

[Hamloc]

A5 we are all waiting for you to spin the ice sheets mass loss into a bogus denial claim! LOL

In the meantime when are you going to post any science from a credible scientific organization to back up your opinions? You seem to be a big talker but you never seem to have any backup for your wacky denial ideas!

Instead you like to nitpick and distract to avoid the meat of the issue. Its not working! LOL

Interesting article:nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/nasa-study-rising-carbon-dioxide-levels-will-help-and-hurt-crops.

As for your concern about glacial melt, it would seem very logical that since the end of the last ice age that glacial sheets would continue to retreat, and to end it like you Chuck lol!

[chuckChuck]

I have never denied that increasing CO2 levels will be of some benefit to some types of crops in some regions but corn tells a different story.

"According to the study, the impact of doubled carbon dioxide concentrations on crop water productivity and yield varies regionally. Results show that maize suffers yield losses with doubled carbon dioxide levels, due in large part to the plant’s already greater efficiency at using carbon dioxide for photosynthesis compared with the other crops. Maize yields fall by 15 percent in areas that use irrigation and by 8 percent in areas that rely on rain. Even so, losses would be more severe without the carbon dioxide increase: yields would decrease 21 percent for irrigated maize and 26 percent for rainfed maize."

Are you going to post research that discusses all the positive and negative impacts of climate change and accept the conclusions or are you going to be selecting only the positive changes and conclusions?

[Integrity_Farmer]

if these whacked out chrysters were ever to pull this "zero carbon" pipe dream ??????
we need a lot more now than the earth needed a hundred thousand years ago

Hang up your stocking for Christmas and hope Santa brings you a lump of coal or a jar of tar.

[BreadWinner]

Nobody cares Chuck they are just baiting you!!! You really are stupid just like a cat chasing a laser light. You do realize the farmers on here can't control Trump or the Environment....

[chuckChuck]

Don’t worry Bread I don’t mind. It’s good fun pointing out how lame the climate change deniers arguments are. A5 works very hard to try to post denialist tidbits and then provide no credible science To back them up! LOL

[farming101]

And just what is the correct amount of ice on Greenland and Antarctica anyway?

[chuckChuck]

And just what is the correct amount of ice on Greenland and Antarctica anyway?

The amount that doesn’t melt and flood all the major coastal cities in the world!

[farming101]

According to some models at the maximum of the last ice age the oceans were 120 meters lower than they are now.
The oceans have been rising ever since and it seems logical will continue to rise.
People will have to move.
In the last 20 years it is thought 930,000,000 people were added to the world's urban population.
There is plenty of time to move people out of harms way.

[jazz]

The amount that doesn’t melt and flood all the major coastal cities in the world!

ha, they did a study showing the earths crust without the ice sheet on it is rising faster than the oceans. Parts of the northern hemisphere have risen half a meter in the post glacial period.

another hoax debunked.

[chuckChuck]

And just what is the correct amount of ice on Greenland and Antarctica anyway?

The amount that doesn’t melt and flood all the major coastal cities in the world!

[chuckChuck]

ha, they did a study showing the earths crust without the ice sheet on it is rising faster than the oceans. Parts of the northern hemisphere have risen half a meter in the post glacial period.

another hoax debunked.

And Why is southern Florida and Miami experiencing increases in the risk of flooding?

[BreadWinner]

Maybe the cities and the people that built them are wrong and they should not of built that close to the ocean, the water was on earth way before humans. Humans don’t control global heating or cooling the sun does.

[chuckChuck]

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/miami-is-the-most-vulnerable-coastal-city-worldwide/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/miami-is-the-most-vulnerable-coastal-city-worldwide/

Miami-Dade County and the Tampa Bay region will feel some of the greatest effects from rising seas, for example, which are projected to gain between 8 and 12 inches in elevation by 2040. Nearly a half-million Floridians living less than 3 feet above current high-water levels could experience regular flooding, experts said, threatening $145 billion in real estate value.

[BreadWinner]

Most of the posters on this forum grow crops on what used to be an inland sea, do you think humans made the water disappear. 🧐