Pandering sorry chuck

Commodity Marketing

Tools

Pandering sorry chuck

Jun 27, 2020 | 19:40 1 Never gonna end.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-06-...olour/12399760 Reply With Quote
Jun 27, 2020 | 20:22 2 In what context are you using the word "sorry"?

An adjective, describing the noun(Chuck)

Or an interjection, as in an apology?

Sorry Chuck, .....as an interjection!

😉 Reply With Quote

  • Jun 27, 2020 | 21:08 3 Its only ever a fúcken one-way street, isn't it!

    Next there will have to be a public apology to the blackman, Eddie Murphy, for voicing "Donkey" from Shrek.

    What a belittling role for Eddie Murphy, voicing a dumb-ass annoying donkey but with other redeeming characteristics that make him likeable. So I guess it balances.

    Unless you want to debate who the real lead role is.... Reply With Quote
    blackpowder's Avatar Jun 27, 2020 | 23:19 4 ROFLMAO.
    So, they get an India Indian American to voice Apu with what accent?? Racist!
    Sitcoms funny for all because they amplify characteristics.
    No more accents allowed I guess.
    Orwellian.
    Only grey allowed now. Only electronic voices too. Eunich TV.
    Well I'm not yet afraid to laugh.
    Hell, today I called my son ( with a laugh) a fat bastard. Unafraid. Unapologetic to own balls.
    Maybe the meek shall inherit the earth but not the nuetered.
    Bahahahaha. Reply With Quote
    blackpowder's Avatar Jun 27, 2020 | 23:40 5 Occurred to me after another drink and a cigar listening to 1940s radio. How far away are we from burning books?? The sane should be laughing. And keeping their powder dry. (If anyone still knows what that means.) Whatever ain't banned. Bahahahaha. Reply With Quote
    blackpowder's Avatar Jun 27, 2020 | 23:44 6 But really, only the SJWs like Chuck are allowed to bait. The rest are knuckledraggers. GFYS! Reply With Quote
    Jun 28, 2020 | 00:09 7 So, no more impressionist comedians?

    I knew a Chinese guy who looked more native than most natives, because everyone assumed he was native, he decided to play the part too. Is that acceptable, when one minority ( who is actually a majority) portrays another minority?

    This literally could paralyze commerce, entertainment, medicine, policing, courts etc., as everyone will be afraid to say or do anything for fear of being labelled a racist by Chuck and friends, with all the consequences that entails. Reply With Quote
    Jun 28, 2020 | 00:10 8
    Quote Originally Posted by blackpowder View Post
    But really, only the SJWs like Chuck are allowed to bait. The rest are knuckledraggers. GFYS!
    You better go have a few more drinks, you're on a roll. Reply With Quote
    blackpowder's Avatar Jun 28, 2020 | 00:52 9 That's why I would never get elected.
    People can't handle the truth. Reply With Quote
    Jun 28, 2020 | 09:42 10 And how are all these changes going to affect you negatively?
    Last edited by chuckChuck; Jun 28, 2020 at 10:15.
    Reply With Quote
    Jun 28, 2020 | 09:50 11
    Quote Originally Posted by chuckChuck View Post
    And how are all these changes are going to affect you negatively?
    I am not a victim of racism, so how this affects me is irrelevant. The relevant question is, how will this positively affect people suffering from racism. If Simpsons removes the visible minorities from their show, does that in any way help other visible minorities?

    I guess the difference is, some of us think results actually matter. Reply With Quote
    Jun 28, 2020 | 09:58 12 I think the solution is nobody should be allowed to have children with someone from their own race.

    In afew hundred years there will only be one race.....the human race.

    Too schtoopit.... Reply With Quote

  • Jun 28, 2020 | 10:13 13
    Quote Originally Posted by farmaholic View Post
    I think the solution is nobody should be allowed to have children with someone from their own race.

    In afew hundred years there will only be one race.....the human race.

    Too schtoopit....
    I expect you say this in jest, but I actually agree. Not sure I support the "allowed" part, but slowly, we will eliminate races. Just look at the average white north american. A few generations ago, our ancestors were segregated into enclaves of their fellow former countrymen, and the racial slurs of the day (and actual discrimination) were against Irish, or Polish, or Ukrainians etc. Fast forward to today, and try to find a young person who still identifies as a single European ethnicity, let alone experiences systemic racism.

    We will get there eventually. Lots of inter racial, and inter cultural marriages (My own included) around here, mostly thanks to the dispropportionate number to males to females from the oil boom days, forcing us to look further afield. Reply With Quote
    Jun 28, 2020 | 10:17 14
    Quote Originally Posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
    I am not a victim of racism, so how this affects me is irrelevant. The relevant question is, how will this positively affect people suffering from racism. If Simpsons removes the visible minorities from their show, does that in any way help other visible minorities?

    I guess the difference is, some of us think results actually matter.
    That easy. By giving acting and voice jobs to people who are being represented. Reply With Quote
    Jun 28, 2020 | 10:26 15
    Quote Originally Posted by chuckChuck View Post
    That easy. By giving acting and voice jobs to people who are being represented.
    Refer to post #3 in this thread.
    Do you think they couldn't find a Caucasian to voice "Donkey"? Reply With Quote
    Jun 28, 2020 | 10:38 16
    Quote Originally Posted by chuckChuck View Post
    That easy. By giving acting and voice jobs to people who are being represented.
    The news article claim is that Simpons will simply remove Apu from the show. So much for diversity. Reply With Quote
    Jun 28, 2020 | 11:15 17
    Quote Originally Posted by farmaholic View Post
    I think the solution is nobody should be allowed to have children with someone from their own race.

    In afew hundred years there will only be one race.....the human race.

    Too schtoopit....
    How many "races" were involved in Russia while the Bolshevik revolution was on its murderous rampage?

    Were the 10-20 million kulaks that perished of a different "race"?

    When the Soviets purged Ukraine with the potato famine, was it one "race" against another?

    What is completely missed - by design - in this stupid, socially constructed babel about "racism" is that the wrongs that are committed have ZERO to do with race, but everything to do with re-framing actual class warfare as something related to highly-emphasized differences between people and people groups.

    It is just staggering that so many people follow the dog-whistle of identity politics. It's a situation designed to deceive and gaslight society and it is terrifyingly effective.

    People lap it up, just like our resident Marxist apologists on this site. Reply With Quote

  • blackpowder's Avatar Jun 28, 2020 | 15:23 18
    Quote Originally Posted by chuckChuck View Post
    And how are all these changes going to affect you negatively?
    They don't personally.
    But then I don't have the subconscious need to be dominated as it seems the SJWs do with their constant hue for govt control. Reply With Quote