Carbon drought ..

Commodity Marketing

Tools

Carbon drought ..

Apr 21, 2019 | 08:02 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-9UlF8hkhs Reply With Quote
farmaholic's Avatar Apr 21, 2019 | 08:07 2


Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2019 | 08:48 3 Happer is not a climate scientist. He is a climate change denier and activist that has never done climate science.

William Happer
American physicist
William Happer is an American physicist who has specialized in the study of atomic physics, optics and spectroscopy. He is the Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics, Emeritus, at Princeton University, and a long-term member of the JASON advisory group, where he pioneered the development of adaptive optics.

Lots of information on the internet about his climate change denier activities and connections at the following websites:

https://www.desmogblog.com/william-happer

https://skepticalscience.com/William_Happer_blog.htm
Last edited by chuckChuck; Apr 21, 2019 at 08:52.
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2019 | 08:51 4 https://www.desmogblog.com/william-happer

More on Happer:
Key Deeds

February 20, 2019

Documents obtained by The Washington Post revealed Will Happer would lead a proposed Presidential Committee on Climate Security, which would be established by executive order. [110]

“The initiative represents the Trump administration’s most recent attempt to question the findings of federal scientists and experts on climate change and comes less than three weeks after Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats delivered a worldwide threat assessment that identified it as a significant security risk,” The Washington Post reported. [110]

The committee would be created “to advise the President on scientific understanding of today’s climate, how the climate might change in the future under natural and human influences, and how a changing climate could affect the security of the United States,” according to the NSC discussion paper. [110]

The paper also claims that prior government-issued reports finding climate change to be a serious threat “have not undergone a rigorous independent and adversarial scientific peer review to examine the certainties and uncertainties of climate science, as well as implications for national security.” [110]

In an interview, Francesco Femia, chief executive officer of the Council on Strategic Risks and co-founder of the Center for Climate and Security, described the committee as a political tool: [110]

“This is the equivalent of setting up a committee on nuclear weapons proliferation and having someone lead it who doesn’t think nuclear weapons exist,” he said. “It’s honestly a blunt force political tool designed to shut the national security community up on climate change.” [110]

Since the article in The Washington Post, a group of military and national security leaders voiced their united opposition to the “Climate Security Committee.” Some statements reproduced below (view more at The Center for Climate and Security): [111]

“This is not a real peer review committee – it’s a political review committee. It’s designed to try to scare our intelligence, defense and science professionals into doing and saying nothing about this pressing threat. I don’t think it will succeed. In fact, I think it would be an embarrassment, like other panels before it” – Rear Admiral David Titley, US Navy (Ret), Senior Member of the Advisory Board at the Center for Climate and Security and former Oceanographer of the Navy.

“It’s important to note the person behind this attempt to chill our defense agencies from understanding and managing climate risk is Dr. Will Happer. Dr. Happer testified before Congress in December 2015 that the world has too little Carbon Dioxide and is too cold – an extreme, fringe view even for the tiny number of scientists who call themselves climate skeptics. This is a clumsy attempt to force the entire federal government to conform to a bizarre view thoroughly rejected by the vast majority of scientists.” – Rear Admiral David Titley, US Navy (Ret), Senior Member of the Advisory Board at the Center for Climate and Security and former Oceanographer of the Navy.

“It’s hard to stop good people from doing good work – especially those in the defense, intelligence and science agencies of our government. One way to try to stop them is through bullying. This proposed ‘adversarial’ committee is a bully committee. And whether it succeeds or not, it will hurt our national security. Hopefully, cooler heads will prevail” – Sherri Goodman, Senior Strategist with the Center for Climate and Security and former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense (Environmental Security).

“The proposed committee appears to be a politically-motivated attempt to discourage our intelligence, defense and science agencies from doing their jobs. If realized, this committee could force a blind spot onto those whose job it is to defend this country, and that could have dangerous national security repercussions. I hope the White House reconsiders, and dumps this bad idea.” — Captain Steve Brock, USN (Ret), Senior Advisor, the Council on Strategic Risks and the Center for Climate and Security.

“This effort meets the definition of insanity—doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. No matter who is the President, our national security agencies have uniformly recognized the security threat from climate change. That question has been answered. Now is the time for action to address the risks.” – Alice Hill, Senior Member of the Advisory Board at the Center for Climate and Security and former Senior Director for Resilience Policy on the National Security Council.

“Even if this committee is successful for a year or two suppressing the acknowledgment of a changing climate as a security risk, the risks will continue to accelerate. The climate does not care what the White House thinks or what Executive Orders are signed – it only responds to the laws of physics. The temperatures will continue to warm, the ice will continue to melt and the seas will continue to rise. And our county will be less secure if we prevent our very own federal agencies from responding to this threat.” – Rear Admiral David Titley, US Navy (Ret), Senior Member of the Advisory Board at the Center for Climate and Security and former Oceanographer of the Navy. Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2019 | 08:51 5 Lol , it’s like you had that info on standby lol. Reply With Quote
  • 2 Likes


  • Apr 21, 2019 | 08:53 6
    Quote Originally Posted by furrowtickler View Post
    Lol , it’s like you had that info on standby lol.
    Then expects us to believe he is not a troll...

    Most reliable poster on Agriville. Reply With Quote
  • 1 Like


  • Apr 21, 2019 | 08:53 7 You have heard of google and the internet? Sorry couldn't resist. Reply With Quote
    Apr 21, 2019 | 08:55 8 Still waiting! Try coming up with some real climate science instead of calling me a troll.
    Last edited by chuckChuck; Apr 21, 2019 at 09:00.
    Reply With Quote
    Apr 21, 2019 | 09:03 9 Chuck to bad you wouldn’t go after these countries instead Reply With Quote
  • 2 Likes


  • Apr 21, 2019 | 09:07 10 Thanks for highlighting another serious environmental threat.
    Change starts at home. What are you doing to reduce plastics? Reply With Quote
  • 1 Like


  • Apr 21, 2019 | 09:12 11
    Quote Originally Posted by chuckChuck View Post
    Still waiting! Try coming up with some real climate science instead of calling me a troll.
    Actually, after you insisted that you were not a troll, and must instead be a useful idiot, who does not receive any monetary benefit for your efforts, I quit calling you a troll. That was many months ago. I simply stated that it makes it hard to believe that you are not, when you exhibit all the hallmarks of the typical internet Troll. Reply With Quote
  • 1 Like


  • blackpowder's Avatar Apr 21, 2019 | 09:17 12
    Quote Originally Posted by chuckChuck View Post
    Thanks for highlighting another serious environmental threat.
    Change starts at home. What are you doing to reduce plastics?
    I'm digging a big hole in impermeable clays and burying everything 1000s of miles from an ocean.
    Your welcome. Reply With Quote
  • 3 Likes


  • Apr 21, 2019 | 09:19 13 A5
    You are good at juvenile insults but not very good at backing up your arguments with credible evidence. Try sticking to the issue being discussed and present something of substance without the personal crap.

    Why not just say you disagree with me or the post and explain why and back it up with some independent evidence? Try it it's not that hard unless you don't have anything to back your opinions up? Reply With Quote
    Apr 21, 2019 | 09:21 14
    Quote Originally Posted by blackpowder View Post
    I'm digging a big hole in impermeable clays and burying everything 1000s of miles from an ocean.
    Your welcome.
    Yup , doing my part too . 1000 times more than those people in those countries listed lol Reply With Quote
  • 1 Like


  • Apr 21, 2019 | 09:27 15
    Quote Originally Posted by Robertbarlage View Post
    Chuck to bad you wouldn’t go after these countries instead
    Yea its terrible. Everyone needs to throw a tank on and go down and have a look .
    If they woulda thrown the money that has been wasted on the gore/suzuki scam , on this problem instead , it could of all been cleaned up
    We need those oceans ! Reply With Quote
  • 1 Like


  • Klause's Avatar Apr 21, 2019 | 09:27 16 Big Bert.


    Or how about the alligator teeth they found in the paleontological zone we had to drill under west of Drayton Valley.


    Then there's fossils of dinos and palm trees in ft. Mac.



    This planet was way warmer in the past


    Scientific consensus means little.

    All that says is that today's Knowledge of a system points to this end result.

    Two weeks from now a completely new discovery can br made and the consensus can shift a mile because these new facts now point to a different conclusion.



    The Dunning-Kruger effect... Humans think they know it all until they begin to actually understand it (whatever "it" is) and figure out they know nothing. Reply With Quote

  • Apr 21, 2019 | 09:28 17
    Quote Originally Posted by chuckChuck View Post
    Happer is not a climate scientist. He is a climate change denier and activist that has never done climate science.

    William Happer
    American physicist
    William Happer is an American physicist who has specialized in the study of atomic physics, optics and spectroscopy. He is the Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics, Emeritus, at Princeton University, and a long-term member of the JASON advisory group, where he pioneered the development of adaptive optics.

    Lots of information on the internet about his climate change denier activities and connections at the following websites:

    https://www.desmogblog.com/william-happer

    https://skepticalscience.com/William_Happer_blog.htm
    Yea he is much less qualified than colonel gore and commadant suzuki ?
    Give me a break , ffs Reply With Quote
  • 1 Like


  • Partners's Avatar Apr 21, 2019 | 09:34 18
    Quote Originally Posted by chuckChuck View Post
    Thanks for highlighting another serious environmental threat.
    Change starts at home. What are you doing to reduce plastics?
    Recycle all we can..
    Recycle containers 3 times the size of garbage..real easy once people get in the mind set..
    Should be a refund..deposit on all plastics..even those grain bags that the neighbors let blow around.. Reply With Quote
    Apr 21, 2019 | 09:45 19 You cant deny non evidence. That's a double negative. When climate scientists produce irrefutable evidence then they can claim victory.

    Until then, china adds the equivalent of candas emissions every 9 months and they are exempt from paris accords for 11 more yrs, just the time when the earth will end. Yes I am arguing we do nothing because nobody else is doing anything.

    What Canada sacrifices for GLOBAL WARMING?

    Name:  carbon.jpg
Views: 910
Size:  72.7 KB Reply With Quote

  • Apr 21, 2019 | 09:53 20 To bad the preachers that are preaching this shit do the least ! Reply With Quote
    Apr 21, 2019 | 10:08 21 Reply With Quote
  • 3 Likes


  • Apr 21, 2019 | 10:23 22 If politicians would appeal to peoples sensibilities they will rise to the standard. Just like recycling. Clearly you can see the good that does. LED lights. Less waste, better furnace, more insulation, car that gets better gas mileage. All things that will make a difference right away. But throw in scaremongering with pseudo science and alarmism plus shaming and hypocrisy and public tunes out. That's what will happen. Almost $2 per L in Vancouver,. $1.30 here. Just 3 months ago it was 99c and still is in the US. Not carbon tax coming on all bills retractive to January with GST on carbon tax. Its all a scam. All pain and no gain. Reply With Quote
  • 2 Likes


  • Apr 21, 2019 | 11:13 23 Correct if I am wrong but C02 is 2 parts oxygen....

    There is definitely a shortage of oxygen to some people's brains with regards to climate change. ... Reply With Quote

  • Apr 21, 2019 | 11:14 24 Chuck yes I am doing my part in fact putting up more bins so I don’t need fucking grain bags! Reply With Quote
  • 2 Likes


  • Apr 21, 2019 | 11:28 25
    Quote Originally Posted by chuckChuck View Post
    A5
    You are good at juvenile insults but not very good at backing up your arguments with credible evidence. Try sticking to the issue being discussed and present something of substance without the personal crap.

    Why not just say you disagree with me or the post and explain why and back it up with some independent evidence? Try it it's not that hard unless you don't have anything to back your opinions up?
    And why don't you refute the science and evidence presented in the video, instead of attacking the Scientist personally as is the Modus operandi's of anyone who does not comprehend the science behind a complicated subject. He is eminently more qualified than you are, yet you come here attacking his character, Because you obviously have no qualifications to refute the science he presents.

    Just like with your fellow posters you never respond to anything that require an answer which would question your belief system , Only way to get you to respond is To lower ourselves to your level with Comments such as the troll comment. Works every time. Reply With Quote
  • 1 Like


  • Apr 21, 2019 | 11:39 26 Worried about expert qualifications of Femia on climate.

    The reverse says this isn't much different than a spouting off about climate through setting up your own Committee on climate, but having nothing in the field except an unrelated degree in economics and political science? Reply With Quote
    fjlip's Avatar Apr 21, 2019 | 11:52 27 "The Dunning-Kruger effect... Humans think they know it all until they begin to actually understand it (whatever "it" is) and figure out they know nothing."


    Or were totally WRONG. Read a good one, Life can be understood from the end, but must be lived be lived from the beginning. We are constantly learning, ask the older guys, it has been HOT and COLD, not our fault, and we can not make a difference. Totally agree we can use better tech to reduce recycle reuse. Not try to dream of changing the MASSIVE earth climate. Happy Easter! Reply With Quote
    Apr 21, 2019 | 11:59 28 Chuck, name one alarmist event that has actually come true. Reply With Quote
    Apr 21, 2019 | 12:22 29 Reply With Quote
  • 1 Like


  • Apr 21, 2019 | 13:00 30


    Reply With Quote