• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Argentina’s 2016/17 soybean harvest not going to be that big!

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Argentina’s 2016/17 soybean harvest not going to be that big!

    Some major key growing regions of the country have received between 12 and 18 inches of rain over the past 30 days. There are large sections of the Pampa Húmeda where as many as 50% of the beans will go unplanted. Revista Chacra estimates this will reduce the total planting area by 700,000 hectares (1.73 million acres). It is estimating total 2016/17soybean production at 50 million tonnes.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	15894989_1398431666835104_494120137443646038_n.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	103.2 KB
ID:	777449

    You also cant tell me that the extreme cold in Europe and Russia with min snow cover hasn't hurt their crops.

    USA seeded smallest winter wheat crop on record.

    Canada didn't have as big of crops as stated earlier.

    USA soy was less than they said.

    #2
    In Weber's Canola Buddy newsletter, it appears the domestic crushers have a wider basis than the companies dedicated more to the export market.

    ....nearby months, must be covered short term.
    Last edited by farmaholic; Jan 16, 2017, 07:50.

    Comment


      #3
      If they grow, or don't plant with 12 to 18 inches of water a season, then we might be at risk of the same yields if "normal" happens?

      Comment


        #4
        On another market note they say with the warm weather farmer deliveries will increase.....uhhh....the elevators said they were booked even in the cold until the end of February .....magic must happen. ...
        Last edited by bucket; Jan 16, 2017, 08:22.

        Comment


          #5
          Grains moving here , one local terminal tells me they have moved 500 cars since Christmas.
          Further to SF3s post , if you dont currently dont follow this site. [URL="http://www.soybeansandcorn.com/"]http://www.soybeansandcorn.com/[/URL]

          good info here.

          PS
          Sorry for posting a marketing post to the mostly everything but commodity marketing forum.

          Comment


            #6
            Good one mcfarms, lol! 500 cars since xmas is very impressive. It seems like every grain hauler in Alberta is on the #1 and 901.

            Comment


              #7
              Combined Argentina / Brazil bean production now pegged 160 million MT, a new record.

              Brazil production is expected up sharply, offsetting Argentina production decline.

              China is now awaiting South American harvest, slowing purchases of U.S. Soybeans of-late. According to USDA last week, global soybean ending stocks for 2016 - 17 will be 5 MMT higher than last year at 82.3 MMT.

              Some analysts are now projecting a huge increase in U.S. soybean ending stocks in 2017-18, up 50 percent. This situation could pressure new crop canola values. Consider price risk management.

              Comment


                #8
                Hey wiseguy ....see the stats on percentage space available on both the prairies and at port?

                And no space available.... or they now decide to buy garbage durum and plug it up again....

                Comment


                  #9
                  Errol

                  Could you run a scenario of price risk management and it's costs to a farmer?

                  Give us an example of options ...puts and calls .....and their costs and a net price per bushel for the producer after he pays the fees...

                  Show us the upside and the downside and the benefits of it.


                  Let's say I have 10000 bushels I want "protected" of new crop durum.

                  Or canola wheat lentils flax.....

                  What market in Canada is liquid enough to trade price risk management options on?

                  Just asking....
                  Last edited by bucket; Jan 16, 2017, 09:07.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Do the Anal-cysts take into account production risk when they're talking price protection risk?

                    Sometimes I think the amount of actual production(unproduced) a person is willing to "risk" protecting is minuscule. Unless of course you're talking about only paper trading..... then why grow the crop?
                    Last edited by farmaholic; Jan 16, 2017, 09:19.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Farmaholic

                      Exactly. ...if there is enough money to be made on paper .....to make my farm that much more profitable. ...why would I farm?


                      There is only one market that trades in Canada. ...canola....and most honest brokers will tell you it's not very liquid.....

                      So everything else is based on US exchanges.....making it difficult in Canada because there is no transparency to the industry here....


                      The US reports sales as they are made.....no such thing here.

                      The commissions in North Dakota make good opinion pieces for their producers....we have guys on commissions here doing what exactly?

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Much rather trade canola than MGE wheat.
                        Actually delivering against a contract is another thing all together.
                        Low risk paper trading is backed up by the real thing. That is why a guy needs to farm.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          bucket . . . some strategies some clients have started utilizing guarding new crop canola.

                          1. Short Nov futures outright . . . as there are really no new crop canola put options trading very well just yet, some growers have shorted the futures outright until they decide to lock the basis and/or feel more comfortable with production prospects. As some point, these short hedges will be offset, once DDC contracts are signed.

                          2. Mar/May canola put options. ICE canola futures are already dropped $40 to $50/MT from early December. These options are being valuable protection, but timing of course is important.

                          3. Soymeal put options . . . an idea . . . take as opinion only, but we feel there is overall potential more downside in the U.S. soy market more than Cdn. Our reasoning . . . Trump and the trade standoff with China ahead. China basically stopped buying U.S. beans on Dec 23rd. Also, South American production will be another record. China is waiting to divert purchases.

                          4. Nov soybean put option bear spreads . . . buy a put, sell a put and create a $1 plus downward window for a more affordable price. Negative to this, new crop soybeans may drop more than $1/bu and then your coverage is maxed out. Some analysts stateside very bearish beans suggesting a $6 in front of soy prices next fall. Too early to predict that (IMO).

                          5. DDC contracts . . . basis is the question here. If you can live with the basis consider starting your pricing, but production risk risk and quality a risk. Start gradually. I favour using options as there is no delivery, production obligation and wait on DDC's later in crop year (IMO).

                          bucket . . . cost is variable depending on quality of price protection. solid Mar/May canola puts will trade around $15 to $20/MT . . . meal puts are cheeper than soybean . . . they range $10 to $15/ton for very decent quality protection. Again it may be better to leap-frog your position . . . example, buy Mar/Mar anD than cash out and purchase Jul onward for protection. Why? Time value is far more expensive than a broker's commission. Leap frog strategy is actually less expensive. Try not to spend an arm and a leg on time . . . that makes options unaffordable and less responsive. Soybean options are expensive . . . for soybean and cattle, we typically use put option near spreads and call option bull spreads to reduce overall premium cost . . . an idea.





                          Originally posted by bucket View Post
                          Errol

                          Could you run a scenario of price risk management and it's costs to a farmer?

                          Give us an example of options ...puts and calls .....and their costs and a net price per bushel for the producer after he pays the fees...

                          Show us the upside and the downside and the benefits of it.


                          Let's say I have 10000 bushels I want "protected" of new crop durum.

                          Or canola wheat lentils flax.....

                          What market in Canada is liquid enough to trade price risk management options on?

                          Just asking....

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Errol

                            You didn't explain a net cost to the producer.

                            Using options that cost 15 to 20 a tonne is 50 cents a bushel.....


                            Now figure that expense against what he might get paid....what''s the net after the smoke clears.

                            I am a simple bastard .....I have enough complications getting the crop in and off to add whether I am paying margins on a crop that mother nature decides to make me combine in December.

                            So put some net figures and actual costs to all the scenarios because you never call a broker for free.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              bucket . . . unless I'm interpreting your question wrong, there is no way of knowing the return on your price protection as the market is always a moving target. Put options may expire worthless, which is the best case situation as that suggests cash price rose. You would lose the say 50 cents/bu but sell into the higher cash market. If Nov canola drops to $440/MT, your put options would kick in value. Lets say you own a $480 put option . . . you would be $40/MT in the money - your premium = about $25/MT return. This is horseback arithmatic.
                              Originally posted by bucket View Post
                              Errol It is simply price protection in an uncertain commodity world.

                              An advantage of options is the grower can manage your own price protection program, not the government. You have total flexibility to manage your own business, without program rules and a major middleman.

                              You didn't explain a net cost to the producer.

                              Using options that cost 15 to 20 a tonne is 50 cents a bushel.....


                              Now figure that expense against what he might get paid....what''s the net after the smoke clears.

                              I am a simple bastard .....I have enough complications getting the crop in and off to add whether I am paying margins on a crop that mother nature decides to make me combine in December.

                              So put some net figures and actual costs to all the scenarios because you never call a broker for free.

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...