• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

This one's for SADIE

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    This one's for SADIE

    http://www.canadiancattlemen.ca/news/cfia-maps-out-service-standards-practices/1000942106/

    CFIA maps out service standards, practices
    Agency to open new complaints, appeals office April 1
    Feb 28, 2012 3:46 PM - 0 comments


    Processor and producer groups are hailing the Canadian Food Inspection Agency's launch of a "statement of rights and service" and guides to inspection as a way to better understand their own roles in the process.

    Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz on Monday said the move is meant to "strengthen communication and interaction between the agency, consumers, producers and the entire value chain."

    The broader document, the Statement of Rights and Service for Producers, Consumers and Other Stakeholders, lays out the responsibilities and functions of the agency and its staff in general terms, such as

    protecting Canadians from preventable health risks;
    implementing food safety measures;
    managing risks and emergencies regarding food, animals and plants; and
    promoting food safety and systems.

    Among other points, the statement noted agency staff are "dedicated to the consistent and impartial application of the legislation for which we are responsible" and that "our reputation and credibility are vital to our ability to deliver our mandate."

    Monday's release also includes six guides to the inspection process -- including one for producers, laying out the CFIA inspector's legal authority, types of inspections performed at farms and agribusinesses, and the producer's legal obligations.

    Keystone Agricultural Producers, Manitoba's general farm organization, said in a separate release that the guidelines for inspection for farmers "are very clear and will serve to assist producers" in the process.

    The agency on Monday also announced plans for a new complaints and appeals mechanism, which Ritz said will "provide a more transparent and accessible way for businesses to register complaints and appeals on CFIA's decisions and service quality."

    The new mechanism, the agency said, is meant to complement the CFIA's processes already in place by using a "single window" approach to register concerns or appeals dealing with "quality of service, administrative errors and regulatory decisions."

    The single window, to be run through a new CFIA Office of Complaints and Appeals scheduled to be up and running by April 1, will allowing regulatory decisions and service quality issues to be "more thoroughly addressed," CFIA said.

    "Frustrations"

    Spokesmen for the Canadian Meat Council, Canadian Poultry and Egg Processors Council and Further Poultry Processors Association of Canada said in a joint release Monday that the CFIA's moves will "provide a strong foundation for future consultations on the development of a modernized food safety system."

    "The CFIA is the competent authority in Canada for federal regulatory compliance," Canadian Cattlemen's Association president Travis Toews said in a separate release. "The fact that there will now be a standard in place to ensure the CFIA is accountable for the service they provide will help to elevate stakeholder confidence in the process."

    CCA vice-president Martin Unrau predicted in the same release that the planned complaints and appeals mechanism "will be well-received by industry and particularly producers who have experienced frustrations with the CFIA inspection process in the past."

    "Taken together, the steps announced today help to address gaps in the process that needed to be improved," Unrau said.

    "It is refreshing to see government to rectify some of the issues we faced during the 2009 anaplasmosis investigation that put our 15,000 cattle under quarantine unnecessarily," Joe Gardner, general manager of the Douglas Lake Ranch about 90 km south of Kamloops, said in a release Monday from the British Columbia Cattlemen's Association.

    "I see these new guidelines as a way to avoid unnecessary quarantines that have a huge impact on ranch businesses."

    Marilyn Braun-Pollon, vice-president for agribusiness with the Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB), said in a separate release that the agency's moves are "a positive first step and we hope the CFIA ensures this culture of change is reflected in their daily interactions with producers and small businesses."

    CFIB, the federal government noted, played a leading role in "making sure these documents help businesses better understand their own role and responsibilities as well as what service standards they should expect from CFIA."

    The CFIB said its 2007 report card on the CFIA found significant "room for improvement" and that "only one in five agribusinesses believed the CFIA provided good overall service."

    #2
    If you go to the article, there are links embedded in it.

    Comment


      #3
      Thanks Kato for the Post.

      Both you and I have worked in Rural Veterinary Clinics so we have had the previlige of seeing CFIA from a differenct perspective.

      CFIA is notarious for getting themselves into "blunders". The Anaplasomsis outbreak in Southern BC. The Anthrax situation in northeastern Saskatchewan a couple of summers ago.

      Presently we keep seeing ads in the Western Producer, Other beef papers about:

      BIOSECURITY----Call ######

      I was at a veterinary meeting a couple years ago and one speaker mentioned they were launching this program and wanted the practicing veterinarians to promote it. The speaker asked for any suggestings on how to obtain producer interest. At the coffee break she was didn't attract much attention with her topic and presentation.

      Not much interest in the cattlemen I talk to---More regulations?????

      Comment


        #4
        Biosecurity in cattle is about as attainable as biosecurity for people, IMHO. Contact with other people is unavoidable, and we all live with the risk of pandemic. Our cattle do the same.

        The whole industry is based on mingling and mixing animals, and dragging them all over the country. They are not like pigs or chickens. They don't live in isolation barns, and they don't have a lifespan measured in weeks or months.

        We have a cow herd, and a backgrounding sideline. Therefore, bugs and diseases are all around. You can't disinfect a tractor between pens, you can't stop the wind, and you can't just shut a door on them. The best we can do is keep our vaccinations up to date on our own raised cattle, and eliminate the sickness in the feeders as quickly as possible. It also doesn't take long to pick out the feeders that have come from "closed herds", where the guys tell us they don't vaccinate because "they don't have problems". Yup, they don't have problems, the problems are just waiting for the first immune challenge.

        If fmd happened, all the biosecurity in the world wouldn't save anyone from the fallout. The closed herds would be just as quarantined as everyone else.

        A biosecure cattle world, with no disease would be lovely, but so would a world where our kids never caught a cold. They are both about as easily achieved. That's just my opinion.

        Comment


          #5
          Way over my head , but it just sounds like empire building to me.

          Comment


            #6
            Biosecurity? How do you keep out the wildlife, the hunters, the snowmobilers, the OIL & GAS industry? Oh, I can see a conflict with federal biosecurity regulations and the loss of property rights in Alberta! Who then will be liable?

            Comment

            • Reply to this Thread
            • Return to Topic List
            Working...