• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Evidence BP Spill was planned

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Evidence BP Spill was planned

    http://www.infowars.com/evidence-points-to-bp-
    oil-spill-false-flag/

    This investigative article has been digging into
    share activity etc. of BP prior to the blowout.

    Here is a short blurb from the article, which is
    worth some attention:


    "Possible prior knowledge of the explosion is also
    evident via huge dumping of stocks and shares in
    the weeks and days prior to the incident.

    Goldman Sachs dumped 44% of its shares in BP Oil
    during the first quarter – shares that subsequently
    lost 36 percent of their value, equating to $96
    million.

    Other asset management firms also sold huge
    blocks of BP stock in the first quarter. Though the
    amounts pale in comparison to Goldman’s
    holdings, Wachovia, owned by Wells Fargo, sold
    98% of its shares in BP and Swiss bank UBS sold 97%
    of its BP shares.

    Furthermore, as reported by the London Telegraph
    on June 5th, Tony Hayward, the chief executive of
    BP, sold £1.4 million of his shares in the fuel giant
    weeks before the spill.".....


    Then to make my day, our local newspaper editor (if
    you can call her that)... (paper owned by
    Quebecor)... puts a guest editorial into the paper
    from one of this media groups bloggers. Guess
    what? its says look at the bad oil spill, look at the
    bad tar sands, BAD FOSSIL FUEL... lets build quote
    "modern, efficient, safe nuclear power." Gee I didn't
    see this coming, NOT!

    Technology to prevent blowouts in this sensitive
    gulf region were not demanded by the USA
    government (as they are in Europe) ... but we are
    supposed to now throw away all our evil ways of
    using fossils fuels and TRUST the Experts as they
    play with their nuclear willies.

    Alberta could build all kinds of nuclear power
    plants, but that won't stop the development of the
    tar sands. In fact, they will use these obamanations
    for heat and in situ bitumen drilling (the tars sands
    are getting too deep to open mine).

    How's that old saying go... "follow the money"....
    "who benefits?"

    With all the new refineries planned for the
    Edmonton area, nuclear power plants in Peace River
    ... Alberta won't be fit for man or beast to live in
    anymore. BUT, some people will have jobs and
    make lots of money... so that makes it OK...

    Just because we have these resources... do we have
    to prostitute ourselves to the world to develop
    them?

    #2
    Kathy, the best bet is to quit reading those articles. Just trust our politicians and let them turn this province into a wasteland of pollution.

    Future generations will don their air filtered masks before retiring for the night and perhaps crawling under their lead lined sheets as well.

    Yes, the money flows as does the millions of barrels of crude or articial crude which is whooshing its way south every minute of every day. We must supply the USA with what they want and need and the NAFTA assures them that they will not pay more for it than Canadians do and we can't hold back on supply either. We are owned and controlled by these circumstances...get used to it.

    Comment


      #3
      OR - we can believe that everything that is happening is happening for a reason. Or maybe make that two reasons. To either find happiness or to learn.

      In this particular case, we can only hope that humanity learns something.

      I actually think that there is a lot of learning going on right now Kathy, and thanks to folks like yourself for helping us along.

      Comment


        #4
        It seems the lessons you are talking about need to be learned by each successive generation. Much of these troubles could be adverted by not allowing short selling thus no need for letting things run down to a breaking point. Also some sort of limits on share dumping by principals. I dislike conspiracies but there certainly is plenty of evidence that this was an accident waiting to happen. Now the question for me is if I knew something would I sell short and keep my mouth shut? Hmmm makes for some interesting sole searching.

        Comment


          #5
          I would guess that someone in the know could see that safety was lacking, and that it was inevitable for a major accident to happen. A bad reputation gets around fast. If I was invested in a company that was developing a reputation for being slack with safety, especially in something as serious as off shore drilling, I'd take my money and run.

          Of course this is all academic, since I have no money to invest in anything anyway. ;-)

          Comment

          • Reply to this Thread
          • Return to Topic List
          Working...