• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Oh....oh!!!!!!!

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    The graph shown in this this thread would be the equivalent of a second in time of eternity....

    50 year graph over even a 10000 year time period......you can't take that seriously....

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
      https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/snow-and-ice/extent/sea-ice/N/12 https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/snow-and-ice/extent/sea-ice/N/12
      [ATTACH]5595[/ATTACH]
      Yup , now let’s look at the rest of the story .... not just a snap shot of history . Long term data ....


      So yup, chuck ice in general has decreased since the last major sunspot minimum, but still historically high over the past 3000 years .

      Comment


        #18
        Your graph shows a large drop in sea ice extent in the 20th century which fits with the current scientific evidence that human caused climate change is occurring.

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
          Your graph shows a large drop in sea ice extent in the 20th century which fits with the current scientific evidence that human caused climate change is occurring.
          You know chuck trying to save a guy from embarrassing himself is fruitless. You have lost so many arguments on climate change its not even funny. A rational person would reevaluate themselves with a long walk in the snow that's supposed to be gone by now.

          First loss, wildly inaccurate modally resembling nothing in reality. Second loss, 20 years of stagnate temperature and your 3rd loss is coming up when you find out one way or another, the earth is actually cooling in the past 5 years.

          Comment


            #20
            Another example of flat earth logic? LMAO

            Comment


              #21
              Anyone else notice the daily propaganda put out by CBC? They are sure working hard to prove the need for a carbon tax. Comments are ridiculous. In one article, a commenter said farmers are carbon tax exempt! I mean how closely does some torontonian watch the weather? They never had winter in the first place, just a month of cooler than fall temps. Meanwhile we freeze out here trying to feed those types!

              The public just doesn’t know the truth. Surely I can’t be the only one on here setting the record straight? We need to actively share the truth with people who may be swayed by it. Help a guy out?
              Last edited by Sheepwheat; Feb 13, 2020, 10:08.

              Comment


                #22
                Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                Your graph shows a large drop in sea ice extent in the 20th century which fits with the current scientific evidence that human caused climate change is occurring.
                Or does it show a natural reduction from the last major solar minimum that caused the little ice age ....

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                  Another example of flat earth logic? LMAO
                  So back to unreason and irrationality for you eh? Your bed.

                  But soon the evidence will be overwhelming and undeniable.

                  Comment


                    #24
                    If chuck actually did some obervations he would know that ice isnt like rock. its not some hard monolith that never changes. it ebbs and flows, it melts and reforms, it moves with currents and winds, it even rides over top of each other, larger flows crush smaller ones, ride over them. And the seas ice extents are bordering agains warm Atlantic and pacific currents that ebb and flow as well and the jet stream doing the same.

                    Its not supposed to be stagnate.

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Has anyone ever wondered why the graphs of arctic sea ice extent always start in 1979? Even though satellite data exists back into the early 60's, and other records and proxies go back much further?

                      Do you think that 1979 is a random date, or represents a high or a low in arctic sea ice?

                      Same for Antarctica. Anyone know what years their records were set, and that the record max and min were only 2 years apart, and represent a 20% decline in two years. Actually, not true, the maximum record was broken again in recent years, contrary to popular belief, the minimum stands.

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
                        Has anyone ever wondered why the graphs of arctic sea ice extent always start in 1979? Even though satellite data exists back into the early 60's, and other records and proxies go back much further?
                        Well if it's anything like temperature we all know those extreme records were set 100+ yrs ago. Probably sea ice has a similar result.

                        But rapidly melting? Only a climate radical could draw that conclusion.

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by jazz View Post
                          Well if it's anything like temperature we all know those extreme records were set 100+ yrs ago. Probably sea ice has a similar result.

                          But rapidly melting? Only a climate radical could draw that conclusion.
                          Since I'm quite certain the alarmists haven't gone looking for the data I was asking about, I will help them out.

                          This is from the 1990 IPCC report. For some reason back then, the IPCC had satellite data back to the early 70's. Now they only have data from 1979 on. Strange indeed.

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IPCC 1990.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	16.1 KB
ID:	769387

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Shame on you, if you keep exposing data like that Greta won't be able to afford her Valium and Al Gore will have to go back to selling tobacco.

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                              Your graph shows a large drop in sea ice extent in the 20th century which fits with the current scientific evidence that human caused climate change is occurring.
                              Well not really .....
                              If you just look at the time from the last mini ice age ya ....

                              But if you don’t exclude the rest of the data it shows a much different, repeatable climate change story based on ice cores and scientific studies ....


                              So was the man made climate change responsible for every run up in the history of that graph as well ? Or much more complicated than simply blaming C02 ?

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
                                Since I'm quite certain the alarmists haven't gone looking for the data I was asking about, I will help them out.

                                This is from the 1990 IPCC report. For some reason back then, the IPCC had satellite data back to the early 70's. Now they only have data from 1979 on. Strange indeed.

                                [ATTACH]5597[/ATTACH]
                                Great responses fellows!

                                That is the SCAM, cherry pick data to validate the LIE! The Cult laps up the candied examples and howls the sky is falling! Tax me all powerful liberals to undo the natural cycles!

                                What a sorry bunch of lemmings! Yes sheepwheat I share the examples of DOOM that never happened. Chuck STILL can't show one prediction that came true.

                                Comment

                                • Reply to this Thread
                                • Return to Topic List
                                Working...
                                X

                                This website uses tracking tools, including cookies. We use these technologies for a variety of reasons, including to recognize new and past website users, to customize your experience, perform analytics and deliver personalized advertising on our sites, apps and newsletters and across the Internet based on your interests.
                                You agree to our and by clicking I agree.