Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5
View Post
People don't take accountability. They virtue signal, they say what they need to to get off the hook, or they get defensive. Very few actually sit down in their thoughts about things to be properly accountable. And when they do, they can do it for some subjects, and not others.
The idea that people who don't hold the government accountable have no personal accountability but the people who want to hold the government accountable have good personal accountability is an idealistic one.
Most people who want to hold the government accountable simply don't agree with the government. If there's an issue the government has covered that they agree on the handling of, they will not bring up that the government needs to be accountable.
So then what is the point of accountability? If someone only wants it because they disagree, then it's not accountability they want, they want to be proven right.
Being proven right is not the same as taking accountability.
The thought is, what, the government steps up and says "Hey, we could have handled Covid better. We were working with the knowledge we had at the time and felt it was the proper course for the province/country. The vaccine was our best path forward for the majority of the population so it was our responsibility to make that clear. Some of the methodology of implementation was not a great decision in hindsight, and that is regrettable." and magically all the dissenters on here would be fine because the government took accountability?
Not happening, because to them accountability is saying all decisions were wrong, which again, is not accountability, it's wanting to be proven "right".
Comment