Covid

[cropgrower]

You really believe there was a way to introduce an epidemic technology without the conspiracy anti-vaxers throwing a tantrum? In our times of internet hysteria, nothing would have been good enough or safe enough.

Well for a start they shot themselves in the foot by wanting to keep all data hid for 75 years , they are fully to blame for lots becoming so called anti-vaxers , shut up , don't ask questions , follow the ever changing science , what did they expect ? the pricks shud never be trusted again

[agstar77]

So you do finally subscribe to the widely accepted lab leak theory as opposed to the wet market propaganda.

In your opinion was the introduction of covid incompetence or maliciousness?

Nice try.

[cropgrower]

Nice try.

how about answering the question ?

[agstar77]

You would have to be crazy to deliberately release a virus.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

You would have to be crazy to deliberately release a virus.

I'm with you on this one, I think incompetence led to an accidental release.

That's why I was surprised when you started talking about introducing epidemic technology. Introduce sounds intentional.

[agstar77]

Vaccine technology?

[chuckChuck]

Kids at higher risk of rare heart and inflammatory conditions after COVID-19 infection than from vaccine

[url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/wellness/article-qa-what-does-a-new-study-on-covid-19-tell-us-about-the-risks-to/[/url]
What is the high-level take-away?


The main findings were that we saw more higher risks following a COVID infection, rather than a COVID vaccination. And after the infection, the risks remained higher for almost a year.

Whereas after a COVID vaccination, we did see high risks only for myocarditis or pericarditis, so one of the five conditions we considered, but that high risk only remained elevated for around four to six weeks, after which it declined or went back to the baseline risk.

[chuckChuck]

The rabid antivaxers and antiscience crowd never come up with credible evidence to support their dumb ass amateur hour theories.

The antivaxer club is "immune" to credible science and wants us to go back to an era of superstition and speculation based on social media rumours.

Ask the antivaxer club, if vaccines are so dangerous, why does every premier including Scott Moe and Danny Smith still promote vaccines for numerous diseases including covid and they quickly shut up and run away from answering!

The vast majority of the entitled antivaxer club grew up with the benefits of vaccines and modern medicine but are now embracing wing nut fringe ideas about both.

The baby boomers grew up with the threat of polio and other life altering infectious diseases and saw vaccines that were very effective at reducing risks of serious disease.

Just like on a lot of issues, the antivaxer club wants us to regress on healthcare to a period of ignorance and fear.

[cropgrower]

How nice and caring of the UK government not wanting to distress or upset anybody , move on nobody cares

[fjlip]

Right there is all we need to be SUSPICIOUS of everything Pharma/Gov/media told us