keep taking all the jabs you can get cc
-
-
This is MY credible science...yours is propaganda!
PS we DON'T enjoy your disorder...
Comment
-
-
You are the king of garbage science. Check the credentials of source before you post c##p.Originally posted by fjlip View PostComment
-
Yeah that's Flippers kind of "science" alright.
It comes with pictures so flipper can understand at least a few of the 86 neuropsychiatric disorders!
Only 86 of them! LOL
And flipper falls for it like a fly on excrement!
Comment
-
You wacky lefty nut bars should post some credible science showing how safe and effective the vaxxx is, you can’t because it isn’t.Comment
-
Tsipper you are all hat and no cattle when talking about science and covid vaccines!
You aint got nothin sucker!
[url]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38282394/[/url]
"Injection site discomfort and fatigue were the most common side effect observed in mRNA, non-replicating viral vector, inactivated, and protein subunit-based vaccines. All the approved vaccines were found safe and efficacious but mRNA-based vaccines were found to be more efficacious against SARS-CoV-2 than other platforms."
Safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials
Abstract
Vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been discovered within a very small duration of time as compared to the traditional way for the development of vaccines, which raised the question about the safety and efficacy of the approved vaccines. The purpose of this study is to look at the effectiveness and safety of vaccine platforms against the incidence of COVID-19. The literature search was performed on PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, and clinical trials.gov databases for studies published between 1 January 2020 and 19 February 2022. Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis Statement guidelines were followed. Among 284 articles received by keywords, a total of 11 studies were eligible according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria (studies in special populations, e.g., pregnant women, paediatric patients, editorials, case reports, review articles, preclinical and in vitro studies) of the study. A total of 247,186 participants were considered for randomisation at baseline, among them, 129,572 (52.42%) were provided with vaccine (Intervention group) and 117,614 (47.58%) with the placebo (Control group). A pooled fold change estimation of 0.19 (95% CI: 0.12-0.31, p < 0.0001) showed significant protection against the incidence of COVID-19 in the vaccines received group versus the placebo group. mRNA based, inactivated vaccines and non-replicating viral vector-based vaccines showed significantly protection against the incidence of COVID-19 compared to placebo with pooled fold change estimation was 0.08 (95% CI: 0.06-0.10), 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14-0.29) and 0.36 (95% CI: 0.28-0.46), respectively. Injection site discomfort and fatigue were the most common side effect observed in mRNA, non-replicating viral vector, inactivated, and protein subunit-based vaccines. All the approved vaccines were found safe and efficacious but mRNA-based vaccines were found to be more efficacious against SARS-CoV-2 than other platforms.
Comment
-
Nobody believes it except a few fools, we need to know the real world results…Comment
-
-
Really funny sickoComment
-
Sick people, vaxed that got Covid several times, sudden cancers in healthy till then...real world easy to believe...Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment