• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

China’s BYD outsells Tesla in Europe for first time

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    So there has been no lightning across Canada this spring? LOL

    And accidental fires are made much worse by very dry forests because of climate change!

    So get a brain you fools!

    "In Canada, slightly more than half of all wildfires are caused by humans. While this represents a significant portion of ignitions, lightning strikes are responsible for a larger area burned, accounting for 67% of the land affected.

    Here's a more detailed breakdown:
    • Human-caused:
      Around 50% of wildfires in Canada are started by human activity, according to Natural Resources Canada.
    • Lightning-caused:
      Lightning is responsible for the remaining 50% of wildfire starts.
    • Area Burned:
      While lightning is responsible for half the ignitions, it accounts for a larger portion of the area burned (67%)."

    ?
    Last edited by chuckChuck; Jun 6, 2025, 07:40.

    Comment


      #42
      you have posted no link for that , so not true , you cc have been conned by everything TV says , and like a parrot repeats it

      Comment


        #43
        They charged a guy for lighting fires near here last week.

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
          Yeah Abusrd 5 and if you hadn't noticed, the boreal forests in Canada are warming and drying out because of human climate change. And the resulting increase in the severity and frequency of forest fires is causing all kinds of losses and health impacts.

          But of course you don't follow climate science or evidence.

          Even after the $10 billion dollars of losses when Fort Mac burned in 2016 you keep denying and disputing the connection to climate change!
          You don't even bother checking what thread you are responding to, or reading the posts, or checking to see if your response is relevant in any way, do you?
          You just have some pre-assigned talking points for the day, and you will use them regardless of irrelevance.

          This was a thread about electric cars. You started it, you probably should have known that I posted a headline about yet another ship on fire from the electric cars on board. And you responded with Forest fires. And the usual name calling.

          Comment


            #45
            Climate change CHUCK???

            Comment

            • Reply to this Thread
            • Return to Topic List
            Working...