You must have read the report chuck? What percent of Alberta's farmland is currently taken up by oil and gas facilities?
More or less than the 1% this report claims when we reach the imaginary net zero?
Keeping in mind that Alberta currently exports almost all of its energy. Net zero would be just meeting our own needs. So roughly 10 times less energy production.
I couldn't find the stats. So I'll use our own farm you're in the heart of oil and gas country as a proxy. Currently half a percent of our farmland cannot be farmed due to the above ground facilities.
If these were recent facilities, that value would be much lower would you well pads strategically located without access roads.
Very rough math, it looks like under your net zero scenario, would require 20 times more land per unit of energy production. I expected as much much worse than that if we really were honest with the numbers.
???????If you have more accurate values, please share. You have a lot more time on your hands this time of year than I do in the tractors.
More or less than the 1% this report claims when we reach the imaginary net zero?
Keeping in mind that Alberta currently exports almost all of its energy. Net zero would be just meeting our own needs. So roughly 10 times less energy production.
I couldn't find the stats. So I'll use our own farm you're in the heart of oil and gas country as a proxy. Currently half a percent of our farmland cannot be farmed due to the above ground facilities.
If these were recent facilities, that value would be much lower would you well pads strategically located without access roads.
Very rough math, it looks like under your net zero scenario, would require 20 times more land per unit of energy production. I expected as much much worse than that if we really were honest with the numbers.
???????If you have more accurate values, please share. You have a lot more time on your hands this time of year than I do in the tractors.
Comment