• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Meanwhile in Canada

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AlbertaFarmer5
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 12600

    #81
    Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post

    It will take many different approaches not just border enforcement.

    Sounds reasonable.

    What are some of the many different approaches you would recommend?

    Comment

    • chuckChuck
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2006
      • 13075

      #82
      Harm reduction, housing, treatment, reasonable criminal enforcement, not criminalization of addiction and small amounts, increasing mental health resources, increased border enforcement and reducing organized crime along with money laundering.
      What did I miss?

      Comment

      • blackpowder
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 9372

        #83
        How to pay for it with Davos Carney perpetuating an economic flagellation.

        Comment

        • AlbertaFarmer5
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2010
          • 12600

          #84
          Those all sound like reasonable answers.

          I thought this was going to be like your excuses for why cheapest ever unreliable energy is always so much more expensive than conventional fossil fuel energy, where you always reply that there are many reasons, then fail to list any that aren't conspiratorial.

          Comment

          • chuckChuck
            Senior Member
            • Dec 2006
            • 13075

            #85
            Are Texas and North Dakota wrong to have significant amounts of renewable electricity?

            Why have they invested so much if it doesn't work?

            Get ready for a non answer, change of subject, or crickets!

            Comment

            • blackpowder
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2010
              • 9372

              #86
              Let's see how long un-reliables are stuck at 22% and 36% respectively.
              Let's see what happens to ND coal at 55% over the next 20 years.
              Betting it'll be as consistent as Chuck's stupidity.

              Comment

              • furrowtickler
                Senior Member
                • Dec 2004
                • 22228

                #87
                Free government money and oil producing states forced to invest to meet ESG’s
                Why not set up intermittent power supply if it’s a net benefit to their balance sheets and to continue to get free government money they must speak positively of it .
                does it help in certain times of year , yup .
                Chuck has stated and shown repeatedly that it’s the lower cost of energy . But not if it’s factored out 24/7 , 365 days a year
                Energy prices to consumers is proof of that in Europe.
                Must be extremely profitable for the power companies to provide this “cheap” power at very high consumer prices . Quite the gig and leaves the consumers with higher inflation on everything

                Comment

                • shtferbrains
                  Senior Member
                  • Jun 2017
                  • 5301

                  #88
                  Intermittent power supply is parasitic on the system.
                  They can't survive without a host.
                  Without exception they increase overall cost.

                  Comment

                  • chuckChuck
                    Senior Member
                    • Dec 2006
                    • 13075

                    #89
                    Many utilities around the world have lots of renewables that function just fine. So stop the bullshit that they don't work!

                    Its not one or the other when you can use multiple sources of supply and lower emissions.
                    Last edited by chuckChuck; Feb 19, 2025, 10:18.

                    Comment

                    • shtferbrains
                      Senior Member
                      • Jun 2017
                      • 5301

                      #90
                      Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post

                      Trumps initial justification for tarrifs was and is still bullshit.
                      I think everyone agrees with this on the trade deficit part of the BS.
                      Probably even Trump.

                      I saw one theory that made some sense.
                      Trump threatens everyone with huge tariffs to put fear of loosing the market in any businesses that export large % of their product to the US so they consider taking the safer and more economic decision to move there.

                      So far there have been no tariffs actually imposed.
                      There certainly will be some but who knows?
                      But the threat will always be considered by any major exporters that have a choice where to invest.

                      Kee Jim is one of Alberta's most influential cattle feeders.
                      He said he was 80% invested in the US?
                      Risk reduction in a risky business?


                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...