wokeness

[AlbertaFarmer5]

This time it's the Christians and the Muslims on the same side. The government needs to be vewy vewy qwiet.

When your actions have caused these two parties who have been murdering each other for millennia, to unite against your cause, it is safe to say you are on the wrong side of history.

[blackpowder]

The bright side is the unions are illuminating how ridiculous they have become.

[blackpowder]

This time it's the Christians and the Muslims on the same side. The government needs to be vewy vewy qwiet.

[chuckChuck]

That doesn't really sound like settled science, then does it?

After 2023 and a record area of burned forests due to fires in Canada the future of forests looks like more carbon emissions not less.

[sumdumguy]

Maybe we need another convoy - right up their Keaster for Easter in Ottaway. They’ll be changing the name of Ottawa soon, then the woke jokes won’t even know where they are.

[jazz]

Wow, look at our unions going of the radical cliff now.

[blackpowder]

Eventbrite dropped them. But notice the venues holding them.😏

[jazz]

Working overtime because of the 1 Million March 4 Children on the 20th.

Chuck working OT on ppp, must be paying well. Even his union buddies getting the on the action.

Be interesting how they try to smear this protest hopefully it’s chock full of our recent immigrants who are waking up in droves.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

https://climateinstitute.ca/forests-could-tip-the-carbon-scales-either-way-on-canadas-path-to-net-zero/

Forests could tip the carbon scales either way on Canada’s path to net-zero

In spite of this vast potential, however, Canada’s forests have actually been a net source of carbon emissions for the better part of two decades, releasing into the air more carbon than they absorb, according to Natural Resources Canada data. In 2018, emissions from wildfires in B.C. alone were three times greater than the entire province’s annual carbon output.

With the threat of warmer, drier summers in the years to come, there is a real risk of more and bigger fires. Canada and Alaska’s boreal forests could add a cumulative 12 gigatons of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere by mid-century without changes to the way forest fires are managed, according to a recent study published in Science Advances.

Currently, most fire management strategies do not include a focus on limiting carbon emissions from burning forests, which is by far the largest source of carbon emissions from Canadian forests in recent years.

In fact, in line with UN Framework Convention on Climate Change rules, emissions from natural disturbances such as wildfires are generally not included in Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions reporting, while the carbon removals from mature forest regrowth after a fire are.

That doesn't really sound like settled science, then does it?

[chuckChuck]

https://climateinstitute.ca/forests-could-tip-the-carbon-scales-either-way-on-canadas-path-to-net-zero/

Forests could tip the carbon scales either way on Canada’s path to net-zero

In spite of this vast potential, however, Canada’s forests have actually been a net source of carbon emissions for the better part of two decades, releasing into the air more carbon than they absorb, according to Natural Resources Canada data. In 2018, emissions from wildfires in B.C. alone were three times greater than the entire province’s annual carbon output.

With the threat of warmer, drier summers in the years to come, there is a real risk of more and bigger fires. Canada and Alaska’s boreal forests could add a cumulative 12 gigatons of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere by mid-century without changes to the way forest fires are managed, according to a recent study published in Science Advances.

Currently, most fire management strategies do not include a focus on limiting carbon emissions from burning forests, which is by far the largest source of carbon emissions from Canadian forests in recent years.

In fact, in line with UN Framework Convention on Climate Change rules, emissions from natural disturbances such as wildfires are generally not included in Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions reporting, while the carbon removals from mature forest regrowth after a fire are.