COVID misinformation may have caused thousands of deaths in Canada: report

[AlbertaFarmer5]

So, not only is it an estimate, based on models ( and we all remember how accurate the "models" were at the beginning of Covid...), but the lead author, Stephan Lewandowsky has a history of grossly unethical behaviour in the name of bought and paid for science. Having cut his teeth in the global warming fraud.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/11/08/stephan-lewandowskys-ethical-lapses-allowed-his-science-to-be-published-without-oversight/

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/09/05/stephan-lewandowskys-slow-motion-social-science-train-wreck/

[AlbertaFarmer5]

You and Chuck always call this Agrisilly..
Why are you here?
Just bugger off.
Start your own site.
Take Forge and the other fools with you..

And the funniest part about that, is Chuck literally got kicked off of the adult forum of site which he repeated referred to as Agrisilly. He was too irresponsible and immature to even live up to the low standards of a site he himself calls Agrisilly. I'd be embarrassed to post ever again.

[blackpowder]

Must be true. Was a grieving family on News tonight saying anti vax media caused their grandfather to hesitate and that's why he died of Covid. A doctor backed the story up.
In other news Via Rail blaming climate change for late trains.

[checking]

very hard to trust a story that changes every few weeks , facts dont change , take jab you wont get C19 , clearly they did not have a clue , they done the harm themselves ,anybody that can think a small bit for themselves would be put off trusting them ,
and saying they would give test results in 75 years realy put the finishing touches to their credibility
so just themselves to blame for folk not trusting them

Really! You are spouting cave gas.

All that was ever said was that taking the blocking agent (which is what it should have been called to avoid the already pre-C19 poisoned "vaccine" word by the same bunch) would give those most at risk a much better chance of staying out of the hospital. In other words, a good outcome when exposed.

Everybody has their own risk tolerance. Apparently, you considered that you were, and still are, bullet proof. I, however, would suggest that most shooting victims do survive. It didn't have to be that way with this virus. We got lucky that it mutated to become more infectious rather than more deadly.

[cropgrower]

blocking agent ? you mean blocking your veins with clots ?

[Jordy2323]

Really! You are spouting cave gas.

All that was ever said was that taking the blocking agent (which is what it should have been called to avoid the already pre-C19 poisoned "vaccine" word by the same bunch) would give those most at risk a much better chance of staying out of the hospital. In other words, a good outcome when exposed.

Oh that's all that was ever said? Huh?

[chuckChuck]

No vaccine is 100% effective.

In the early waves of covid the vaccines were very effective and preventing infection and reducing severe illness. People including many now antivaxers were lining up to get the vaccine because they were worried just like everyone else.

Viruses mutated to get around the vaccines.

Vaccines get updated as the disease changes. Its hard to keep up with the speed of virus change in a pandemic.

If you want to go back to medicine and medical science before vaccines, antibiotics and pain killers go right ahead. Tell us how it goes.

[Hamloc]

No vaccine is 100% effective.

In the early waves of covid the vaccines were very effective and preventing infection and reducing severe illness. People including many now antivaxers were lining up to get the vaccine because they were worried just like everyone else.

Viruses mutated to get around the vaccines.

Vaccines get updated as the disease changes.

If you want to go back to medicine and medical science before vaccines, antibiotics and pain killers go right ahead. Tell us how it goes.

Chuck2 the CBC had a similar article on the same topic. I will give you the same response that I gave the author of that article. I am in my late fifties and I haven’t missed a day working on the farm in the last 3 years. I am not an anti vaxxer but all the politics connected to the Covid 19 shot made me feel uncomfortable, for that reason I never got the shot. Personally I have never tested positive, many around me have and I am quite sure I have had it. As far as people getting Covid I have seen no difference between those that are vaccinated and those that are not. But I have seen side affects associated with the vaccine. 2 female friends have had long term lesions and rashes that appeared after the second shot, one has had this on her arm for over a year, the other on her leg. Doctors thus far haven’t been successful in treating it. Another after her second shot began showing symptoms similar to rheumatoid arthritis but her blood still tests negative for rheumatoid markers and doctors have been unable to ease her pain. Another had heart issues that have since been resolved. All these people are 30 and under and were required by their employer to be vaccinated. So Chuck2, you can call me anti science or a flat earther or whatever insult you wish to throw at me, I am just damn glad I never got the shot. Enjoy your day.

[fjlip]

Sure harmless, no liability...go get em Christine!

https://twitter.com/i/status/1618669818215014401

https://twitter.com/i/status/1618669425204535296

[checking]

Come on... jordy2323.

You are smarter than that. Those characters that you c&ped are not defined with "one liners" on any subject.

I think the cherry picker that formed your views just did it for you.