• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Happy Chuck?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • WiltonRanch
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 4526

    #21
    Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
    But Putin attacks on Ukraine has nothing to do with the energy crisis in Europe? Or did you forget about that already? LOL. Amnesia? Or just the usual political views?
    Domestic energy security duh!! You wear your partisanship and amnesia on your sleeve better than I. When you hamstring your domestic energy production in favour of dealing with bad actors what do you think eventually happens? Like selling out your domestic manufacturing and shipping it off to a communist nation bent on world domination. Heck I’m sounding like my old socialist Facebook friend on an anti globalization tirade. I think a lot of us relate to where we stand on stuff but where do you aside against everything here?

    Comment

    • shtferbrains
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2017
      • 5300

      #22
      I'm all for interconnect access if we had some forrward thinking politicians who would make the investment and take the heat on developing our hydro potential.
      We could buy cheap surplus renewable solar from the desert states where it is well suited and sell high priced renewable hydro down there in peak 4pm to 7pm times.
      It is unfortunate hydro gets so much bad press when being proposed and built but end up showing many legacy benefits.
      Would be nothing in the SW desert in Nevada and Arizona without the dams on the Colorado River.

      Comment

      • TSIPP
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2013
        • 2682

        #23
        60 years ago the US had a small nuclear reactor in Greenland, it did leak a little but I’m pretty sure the new model won’t.

        Comment

        • dmlfarmer
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2008
          • 1814

          #24
          Originally posted by TSIPP View Post
          60 years ago the US had a small nuclear reactor in Greenland, it did leak a little but I’m pretty sure the new model won’t.
          Since nuclear reactors safely power US submarines and aircraft carriers today, why is it not possible to generate electricity with them on land?

          Comment

          • WiltonRanch
            Senior Member
            • Jul 2012
            • 4526

            #25
            Originally posted by dmlfarmer View Post
            Since nuclear reactors safely power US submarines and aircraft carriers today, why is it not possible to generate electricity with them on land?
            See there’s a logical and reasonable argument right there. The loons will reference incidents like three mile island and Chernobyl which resulted from “the China Syndrome” and of course communist incompetence.

            Comment

            • jazz
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2018
              • 9308

              #26
              Originally posted by dmlfarmer View Post
              Since nuclear reactors safely power US submarines and aircraft carriers today, why is it not possible to generate electricity with them on land?
              It is possible, has been for decades but a little organization called GreenPeace made sure nothing nuclear got built.

              Comment

              • WiltonRanch
                Senior Member
                • Jul 2012
                • 4526

                #27
                Originally posted by jazz View Post
                It is possible, has been for decades but a little organization called GreenPeace made sure nothing nuclear got built.
                Yes, and biggest boosters of this nonsense reside in temperate regions with smaller landbases and higher population densities. A lot of their energy needs are met from importation of cheap energy. Remember old Peter Prebble? Most ardent anti nuke ndp mla college professor. He typified the type.

                Comment

                • chuckChuck
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 13073

                  #28
                  Add Chernobyl and Fukishima to the list of why new nuclear energy is not too popular.

                  Why build new nuclear in Saskatchewan when next door there is a significant source of hydro ready and waiting?

                  Manitoba and Quebec have some of the lowest cost electricity in North America because of their large hydro capacity.

                  Nuclear may have a role, but SMRs are still in the design phase and many years from implementation.

                  Nuclear is one of the most expensive options according Lazards levelized cost of energy analysis LCOE

                  https://www.lazard.com/media/451881/lazards-levelized-cost-of-energy-version-150-vf.pdf

                  Comment

                  • WiltonRanch
                    Senior Member
                    • Jul 2012
                    • 4526

                    #29
                    Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                    Add Chernobyl and Fukishima to the list of why new nuclear energy is not too popular.

                    Why build new nuclear in Saskatchewan when next door there is a significant source of hydro ready and waiting?

                    Manitoba and Quebec have some of the lowest cost electricity in North America because of their large hydro capacity.

                    Nuclear may have a role, but SMRs are still in the design phase and many years from implementation.

                    Nuclear is one of the most expensive options according Lazards levelized cost of energy analysis LCOE

                    https://www.lazard.com/media/451881/lazards-levelized-cost-of-energy-version-150-vf.pdf
                    Right enough. Though if we truly transition from coal and decarbonize demand for electricity will grow exponentially. Nuclear and hydro complement one another as demand spikes are easily covered by hydro with reactors setup by hydro dams for water. While wind farms could power green ammonia production while sequestering co2 making urea. Then it doesn’t really matter about the intermittency of renewables. Not likely it’s happening on any scale anytime soon but it’s alright to brainstorm.

                    Comment

                    • chuckChuck
                      Senior Member
                      • Dec 2006
                      • 13073

                      #30
                      Originally posted by WiltonRanch View Post
                      Right enough. Though if we truly transition from coal and decarbonize demand for electricity will grow exponentially. Nuclear and hydro complement one another as demand spikes are easily covered by hydro with reactors setup by hydro dams for water. While wind farms could power green ammonia production while sequestering co2 making urea. Then it doesn’t really matter about the intermittency of renewables. Not likely it’s happening on any scale anytime soon but it’s alright to brainstorm.




                      Alberta is investing large amounts in wind and solar relatively speaking. They are leading the growth in renewables in Canada.

                      The UK and Australia also have a lot of renewables and the US and China, India have as well.

                      It will be a mix of all types of generating capacity for the forseeable future. Much will depend on each regions resources and needs.

                      But lets end the fiction that renewables are not going to play an important role in a low carbon energy future.

                      its already happening right under our noses in Alberta Saskatchewan and the USA. And we already have 60% of our electricity from hydro which is renewable as well.

                      Looks like there are a lot of chucks out there with their own renewable supply on farm. What a bunch of radicals investing in there own energy production! LOL

                      https://capi-icpa.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/2022-07-25-Ag-Census_QuickThink_Draft_7-Final_reduced.pdf

                      • From 2016 to 2021, the number of farms who
                      report producing (and often using) some
                      type of renewable energy has increased in
                      every province, for a countrywide increase
                      from 10,000 farms to 20,000 farms.

                      The number of farms reporting the
                      production (and sometimes, use) of solar
                      energy increased from 8,000 in 2016 to
                      14,000 in 2021.
                      • Solar energy is more common in the Prairies.
                      Some areas have more than doubled in the
                      number of farms reporting solar energy
                      production, from 200 farms to over 400
                      farms per census division.
                      Last edited by chuckChuck; Aug 14, 2022, 09:52.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...