Originally posted by chuckChuck
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Happy Chuck?
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
I'm all for interconnect access if we had some forrward thinking politicians who would make the investment and take the heat on developing our hydro potential.
We could buy cheap surplus renewable solar from the desert states where it is well suited and sell high priced renewable hydro down there in peak 4pm to 7pm times.
It is unfortunate hydro gets so much bad press when being proposed and built but end up showing many legacy benefits.
Would be nothing in the SW desert in Nevada and Arizona without the dams on the Colorado River.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TSIPP View Post60 years ago the US had a small nuclear reactor in Greenland, it did leak a little but I’m pretty sure the new model won’t.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dmlfarmer View PostSince nuclear reactors safely power US submarines and aircraft carriers today, why is it not possible to generate electricity with them on land?
Comment
-
Originally posted by dmlfarmer View PostSince nuclear reactors safely power US submarines and aircraft carriers today, why is it not possible to generate electricity with them on land?
Comment
-
Originally posted by jazz View PostIt is possible, has been for decades but a little organization called GreenPeace made sure nothing nuclear got built.
Comment
-
Add Chernobyl and Fukishima to the list of why new nuclear energy is not too popular.
Why build new nuclear in Saskatchewan when next door there is a significant source of hydro ready and waiting?
Manitoba and Quebec have some of the lowest cost electricity in North America because of their large hydro capacity.
Nuclear may have a role, but SMRs are still in the design phase and many years from implementation.
Nuclear is one of the most expensive options according Lazards levelized cost of energy analysis LCOE
https://www.lazard.com/media/451881/lazards-levelized-cost-of-energy-version-150-vf.pdf
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostAdd Chernobyl and Fukishima to the list of why new nuclear energy is not too popular.
Why build new nuclear in Saskatchewan when next door there is a significant source of hydro ready and waiting?
Manitoba and Quebec have some of the lowest cost electricity in North America because of their large hydro capacity.
Nuclear may have a role, but SMRs are still in the design phase and many years from implementation.
Nuclear is one of the most expensive options according Lazards levelized cost of energy analysis LCOE
https://www.lazard.com/media/451881/lazards-levelized-cost-of-energy-version-150-vf.pdf
Comment
-
Originally posted by WiltonRanch View PostRight enough. Though if we truly transition from coal and decarbonize demand for electricity will grow exponentially. Nuclear and hydro complement one another as demand spikes are easily covered by hydro with reactors setup by hydro dams for water. While wind farms could power green ammonia production while sequestering co2 making urea. Then it doesn’t really matter about the intermittency of renewables. Not likely it’s happening on any scale anytime soon but it’s alright to brainstorm.
Alberta is investing large amounts in wind and solar relatively speaking. They are leading the growth in renewables in Canada.
The UK and Australia also have a lot of renewables and the US and China, India have as well.
It will be a mix of all types of generating capacity for the forseeable future. Much will depend on each regions resources and needs.
But lets end the fiction that renewables are not going to play an important role in a low carbon energy future.
its already happening right under our noses in Alberta Saskatchewan and the USA. And we already have 60% of our electricity from hydro which is renewable as well.
Looks like there are a lot of chucks out there with their own renewable supply on farm. What a bunch of radicals investing in there own energy production! LOL
https://capi-icpa.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/2022-07-25-Ag-Census_QuickThink_Draft_7-Final_reduced.pdf
• From 2016 to 2021, the number of farms who
report producing (and often using) some
type of renewable energy has increased in
every province, for a countrywide increase
from 10,000 farms to 20,000 farms.
The number of farms reporting the
production (and sometimes, use) of solar
energy increased from 8,000 in 2016 to
14,000 in 2021.
• Solar energy is more common in the Prairies.
Some areas have more than doubled in the
number of farms reporting solar energy
production, from 200 farms to over 400
farms per census division.Last edited by chuckChuck; Aug 14, 2022, 09:52.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment