The Claim was based on in 1998 the NISA admin. instructed the farmers to re-define the shipping costs(defined eligible expense) on the grain tickets as a grain purchase (20%-40%) and deduct it off the amount the 3% matching contribution was calculated on for the on account money in the NISA accounts. This was done by threat of audit or audit. In Sept. 1999 a NISA requested IT Ruling came telling NISA the proper reporting of grain sales and NISA apps. were to be filed the same as IT returns and were your IT farm statements to Rev. Can.. At this point they should have known was wrong. (alleged fraud). CFIB informed the Minister this was being done in the west (only) on a inter-provincial across Can. program.Each year since then other programs were based on NISA averaged amounts, 2% Enhance.,13.5% CSAP,8.1% Risk Man.,2.67% TISP,5.43% FIPP,8.75% GOPP,2.72% COPP,2.63% Kickstart. We attempted adjustment to gross for Kickstart as allowed but was reversed.
The last time I gave the case law to the lawyer which again he never used, I copied to the Minister of Justice, Carol, and Sask. Law Society. Somewhere down the road there may be a judicial inquirery on NISA and a number of people are going to have to explain their actions or lack thereof on this matter. Conspiracy is 50% and up on a cover-up. 5 years and over don't expire if I remember right from RCMP who I sent info. The winds can change as a former Prime Minister being grilled is finding out.
The last time I gave the case law to the lawyer which again he never used, I copied to the Minister of Justice, Carol, and Sask. Law Society. Somewhere down the road there may be a judicial inquirery on NISA and a number of people are going to have to explain their actions or lack thereof on this matter. Conspiracy is 50% and up on a cover-up. 5 years and over don't expire if I remember right from RCMP who I sent info. The winds can change as a former Prime Minister being grilled is finding out.
Comment