• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CWB and CGC Grain Grading at Port....Gossip?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    The CGC is busy trying to spend farmer's money, it seems. Ther e is a program they seem to be trying to flog.....an option for Special Crops Payment Protection. It looks as if they grain merchants want to carry insurance in case they go broke...and guess who they want to fund this insurance scheme? Surprise.......farmers!

    Every farmner should be asking why the hell they don't fund their own insurance scheme.

    Okay, so here's a scheme....why don't farmers get the CGC's Pension Fund to fund farm truck package policies? Anybody in favor?

    Parsley

    Comment


      #42
      Parsley,

      The special crops bonding and licensing issue has been ongoing since 1990.

      I agree that many simply want to down load it onto farmers, and take the risk out of sales transactions for the CGC.

      They want to sit and watch the world go by, keep their jobs, and not be liable for anything if someone doesn't get paid.

      The last scheme didn't assure anyone of anything, and cost a whale of alot of money!

      I hope this time they use common sense.

      1. If you have assured payment, then you will be paid, no matter what.

      2. If the CGC is going to watch grain buyers, then I should be able to phone up the CGC and check if the grain buyer is current on payments, and be assured if I sell to that buyer, that I will get paid. Otherwise there is no use for the CGC to even be watching buyers!

      We need some clear thinking this time, last time 3 years ago the CGC could have made it work but simply forgot logical simple business sense. Too many political games being played!

      Comment


        #43
        Just a note to highlight todays press release from cgc.

        Western Standards Committee tightens tolerances for sprout-damaged kernels to protect CWRS breadmaking quality

        WINNIPEG, April 19, 2001—The Western Standards Committee (WSC) has recommended measures to protect the breadmaking quality of Canadian wheat in years when sprout damage is widespread.

        At its spring meeting on April 3, the committee approved a proposal to add tolerances for severe sprout damage in No. 2 and No. 3 grades of Canada Western Red Spring (CWRS) wheat and to tighten the tolerances for total sprout-damaged kernels in those grades.

        "Recently, there have been sprouting problems with some No. 2 and 3 CWRS wheat delivered to seaboard terminals. Because quality is important to our customers, it is important to farmers and the grain industry," said Douglas Stow, CGC assistant chief commissioner and WSC chairperson. "I’m pleased the committee recognized the importance of addressing this issue that was brought to our attention by the Canadian Wheat Board."

        Sprouting in wheat produces an enzyme, known as alpha-amylase, that breaks down starch when wheat flour is made into bread. Alpha-amylase reduces the water holding capacity of the flour, reducing the number of loaves of bread obtained from a given weight of flour. Sprout damage leads to sticky dough that causes handling problems in the bakery, and coarse, gummy bread that is difficult to slice and package. (See backgrounder for more information.)

        The new tolerances will come into effect Aug. 1, 2001. The table below shows the current and proposed tolerances.

        Sprout-damaged kernels (%)

        Grade name Severe Total Current Proposed Current Proposed

        No. 1 CWRS 0.1 No change 0.5 No change No. 2 CWRS - - 0.2 1.5 1.0 No. 3 CWRS - - 0.3 5.0 3.0

        Pulse grading

        To address concerns about the safe storage of chick peas, the committee recommended narrowing the moisture content range used for "tough" grades of chick peas, from 14.1%- 18.0% down to 14.1%- 16.0%. The proposed change in moisture range for chick peas is subject to the regulatory amendment process and would become effective Aug. 1, 2001.

        The WSC also lent its support to a new fair colour guide sample prepared by the CGC for No. 2 and Extra No. 3 Canada Yellow Peas. The new guide sample better reflects the levels of immaturity and earth tag allowed within the standard of quality for these grades while maintaining the marketing quality of yellow peas.

        New moisture conversion tables for oats and soybeans

        The CGC announced it would release new conversion tables for use with the Model 919 Moisture Meter. The new table for low and high moisture soybeans becomes effective July 1, 2001 and replaces the table issued in 1993. The new table for oats becomes effective Aug. 1, 2001, replacing the table issued in 1991. The calibrations, based on samples tested over five to seven crop years, will give higher moisture contents in oats and lower values in soybeans. The new conversion tables will be available at no charge on the CGC web site at http://www.cgc.ca.

        The WSC meets twice a year to recommend specifications for grades of grain. During the fall meeting it also recommends standard samples of grain for each grade of grain. The committee members include 12 farmers appointed from the major western producer groups, a CGC commissioner, grain inspector and scientist, the chair of the western grain appeal tribunal, and representatives of the Canadian Wheat Board, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, grain processors, and grain exporters. For more information.

        The CGC is the federal agency responsible for establishing and maintaining Canada’s grain quality standards. Its programs result in shipments of grain that consistently meet contract specifications for quality, safety and quantity. The CGC regulates the grain industry to protect producers’ rights and ensure the integrity of grain transactions.

        Comment


          #44
          The following is the link the press release came from. They have a good backgrounder on the impact of sprout on falling number and baking qualities flour.

          http://www.cgc.ca/Views/NewsRel/2001/sproutdamage-e.htm

          Comment

          • Reply to this Thread
          • Return to Topic List
          Working...