Canadian roundtable for sustainable crops CRSC???

[TOM4CWB]

Next Set:

[TOM4CWB]

Next set:







Hope this gives a glimpse of what the Feds are trying to do…. This undermines crop insurance…. Basic common sense economics… it is based on a model that is Not based on real life Canadian Agricultural production…

PM Trudeau and the NDP Liberals have been hypnotized by fast talking perverse climate change WEF/UN politics…. And are attempting to correct a rounding error in global greenhouse gas emissions…. With unrealistic unscientific laws that undermines Canadians and Global food security.

We have a duty to civilization to expose this corruption and chaotic mess.

Blessings and Prayers

[SASKFARMER]

those slimmy ****ers.

[furrowtickler]

Very well said Tom

[AlbertaFarmer5]

those slimmy ****ers.

You mean the NFU?

https://www.nfu.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/nitrogen-fertilizer-report-nfu-2022-en.pdf

The NFU is telling the Liberals exactly what they want to hear. And they are listening only to them apparently.

[SASKFARMER]

the NFU is our spokesman for farmers. just let that sink in. Chuckys are in charge we are fu ked

[wmoebis]

the NFU is our spokesman for farmers. just let that sink in. Chuckys are in charge we are fu ked

Not sure NFU are the spokesman I would think the F##k Trudeau flags and bumper stickers have a bigger impact and influence than them.

[goalieguy847]

So interestingly enough a few years ago a crop wizard who i was lucky enough to do a farm trial with did a very intensive study north of St.Albert on intensive management of wheat. Long story short she had figured out a simple way to see what each cultivar was removing from the soil... soil sample/fertilizer rate/ discoveryield+protein/ then soil sample afterwards to figure out what the removal rate of each cultivar was. Some hard red varieties were as low as 40 ish % with some closer to 80.
Should a bunch of money be put into such research continuing forward so we can ( and should / would want to) grow varieties that utilized the most amount of Nitrogen each and every year?
Why is this not part of the emission reduction plan?

[SASKFARMER]

Because that makes sense and for liberals they don’t understand that.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

So interestingly enough a few years ago a crop wizard who i was lucky enough to do a farm trial with did a very intensive study north of St.Albert on intensive management of wheat. Long story short she had figured out a simple way to see what each cultivar was removing from the soil... soil sample/fertilizer rate/ discoveryield+protein/ then soil sample afterwards to figure out what the removal rate of each cultivar was. Some hard red varieties were as low as 40 ish % with some closer to 80.
Should a bunch of money be put into such research continuing forward so we can ( and should / would want to) grow varieties that utilized the most amount of Nitrogen each and every year?
Why is this not part of the emission reduction plan?

My understanding is that the typical variety trials hold the nutrients constant, therefore if new variety x does 5 % better than old variety y, that indicates that it is being more efficient and using the available nutrients.