• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Invigor 345 issues 2022

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • blackpowder
    replied
    Just saw a neighbor's field of 345.
    From the road it's mostly bare yet.
    No excuse for seed issues like that is there?

    Leave a comment:


  • furrowtickler
    replied
    Leafs on the P505MSL

    Leave a comment:


  • Rareearth
    replied
    The ulitmate, farmer jury will decide at harvest, when its in the bin. Cant argue or ignore those results. Could be devastating for invigor or out vigor.

    Leave a comment:


  • JankoFarms
    replied
    Originally posted by furrowtickler View Post
    Absolutely they should pick up the cost without a doubt . It can be done for less than $10 / ac
    I know it was brought up but quickly ignored, “give it time “ is the fall back . Time is too critical to wait , this is not Kansas with 150 frost free days ….
    Yep they weren’t going to sit around and wait with what’s on the line. Can throw some basic alpine at it which would be cheapest, I think they went with something called Jolt.

    Leave a comment:


  • jazz
    replied
    Invigour 233P seeded May 22nd if you can believe it.

    Dont know if it was a seed batch problem or we seeded too shallow and the winds dried the and crusted the top layer until we got a rain.

    Later seeded stuff looks better for most guys.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0221.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	98.6 KB
ID:	773506
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0222.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	97.7 KB
ID:	773507

    Leave a comment:


  • furrowtickler
    replied
    P505MSL


    Planted at 210,000 seeds / ac
    Took one of the 3 frosts but grew right through
    Never had to spray for beetles
    Last edited by furrowtickler; Jul 2, 2022, 16:46.

    Leave a comment:


  • jazz
    replied
    Originally posted by bucket View Post
    Phuck sakes , I hear that from chemical reps all the time , wait 10 days, don't have 10 days, and when told their product didn't work they are ghosts.
    The clock is ticking on the season.

    Ours has turned the corner now, but probably lost a week of normal growth. I could hit it with foliar something I suppose to give it a kick. Just wondering if its worth throwing more money at it.

    Is the coolish season a factor. Most mornings are under 10deg here for the month and not many days over about 23 deg.

    Leave a comment:


  • bucket
    replied
    Originally posted by furrowtickler View Post
    Absolutely they should pick up the cost without a doubt . It can be done for less than $10 / ac
    I know it was brought up but quickly ignored, “give it time “ is the fall back . Time is too critical to wait , this is not Kansas with 150 frost free days ….
    Phuck sakes , I hear that from chemical reps all the time , wait 10 days, don't have 10 days, and when told their product didn't work they are ghosts.

    Leave a comment:


  • mcfarms
    replied
    Originally posted by bucket View Post
    But who picks up that cost? If the side by side pictures show a problem and it's a seed issue, shouldn't BASF pick up the costs of getting their crop technology to work?

    Imagine buying a new piece of equipment and you had to pay every time you had an issue the first year.

    Canola seed is new every year and for the price it should come with some support.

    I could understand fields 20 miles apart but side by side shows a problem.
    So far the support has been in the form of a tech rep standing in the field and agreeing there was a problem not having a clue to what caused the problem is waiting a week and reporting the issue formally to the call center and from then on complete silence.

    Leave a comment:


  • furrowtickler
    replied
    Originally posted by bucket View Post
    But who picks up that cost? If the side by side pictures show a problem and it's a seed issue, shouldn't BASF pick up the costs of getting their crop technology to work?

    Imagine buying a new piece of equipment and you had to pay every time you had an issue the first year.

    Canola seed is new every year and for the price it should come with some support.

    I could understand fields 20 miles apart but side by side shows a problem.
    Absolutely they should pick up the cost without a doubt . It can be done for less than $10 / ac
    I know it was brought up but quickly ignored, “give it time “ is the fall back . Time is too critical to wait , this is not Kansas with 150 frost free days ….

    Leave a comment:

  • Reply to this Thread
  • Return to Topic List
Working...