• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IS now the time to quit admitting unvaccinated people.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
    The vaccinated outnumber the unvaccinated by a wide margin except in a few pockets where science is not believed.
    You must be the slowest learner I have ever encountered. You seem to have gained absolutely no knowledge in spite of all of the discussions we have had on this topic.
    In all of the global warming debates you had, you invoke this mythical concept of a belief in science, and the completely unscientific concept of consensus. Your methods have been a complete failure on the global warming file.
    So now you apply both of those to your latest obsession of Covid.
    The definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
    Edit, I see I was much too slow finishing my post while combining, and both jazz and sheep wheat beat me to it. Great minds think alike.
    Small minds talk about consensus and belief.
    Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Sep 29, 2021, 10:26.

    Comment


      #72
      "Looks like the govt is getting the population to acquire herd immunity under the guise of a false technology. Its great cover for them. "

      If you are thinking what I am, that VAXED spread unawares to all other VAXED, with lessened symptoms, then ALL will have had COVID, and have natural herd immunity! What a great plan.

      Now add the RECOVERED...won't take long.

      How do those VAXED feel about being used? They lied, didn't they?

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
        There is no credible evidence that covid vaciines will have any long term negative impact on the population. .
        Too funny.
        Is coming from the guy who tries to invoke science or evidence into every post.
        Can you please explain how there could be evidence of something happening in the future?
        Of course, we all realized that you have been drinking the climate change Kool-Aid for so long that you really do believe that models of the future are the equivalent to evidence. As you have proven here multiple times.

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by Sheepwheat View Post
          Just because the majority think a certain thing, does not make it true automatically, does it?

          Someone help me out here. There’s a name for that isn’t there?

          Like the climate change “consensus”.

          Well again I will state that science would not advance, ever, if consensus ruled the day. Because with consensus, it’s over, it’s known completely. Thing is, science is open, always able to adjust as new facts are found out.

          The good news, is soon enough, the facts will be known, and I look forward to that.
          Just one little glitch in your solid hypothesis - science doesn't rule the day any longer.

          It has been subverted and derailed by emotion, the least reliable human characteristic.

          Reference: a mentally challenged girl who has grabbed the world stage in the past couple of years. What are her credentials?

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by burnt View Post
            Reference: a mentally challenged girl who has grabbed the world stage in the past couple of years. What are her credentials?
            Greta isnt in charge of anything and cant effect policy. Thats in contrast to our dangerous dancing retard now in charge of a $2T economy. Our very own Premier went bankrupt and is somehow qualified to run an $80B economy.

            Comment


              #76
              Originally posted by Sheepwheat View Post
              Just because the majority think a certain thing, does not make it true automatically, does it?

              Someone help me out here. There’s a name for that isn’t there?

              Like the climate change “consensus”.

              Well again I will state that science would not advance, ever, if consensus ruled the day. Because with consensus, it’s over, it’s known completely. Thing is, science is open, always able to adjust as new facts are found out.

              The good news, is soon enough, the facts will be known, and I look forward to that.
              Science only deals with facts.all government accepts science.Are you actually saying you are a step ahead of science and governments? If you are you should be a billionaire by now .

              Comment


                #77
                $20 canola targets goin here

                Comment


                  #78
                  Originally posted by caseih View Post
                  $20 canola targets goin here
                  I was just talking to the elevator about canola targets. I said you'll just laugh when I tell you where I want to put my targets at, starting at last springs high and going up from there. No laughing at all, expects them to hit. If 20 and change is harvest pressure, I wonder what comes next?

                  Comment


                    #79
                    The fishing has started.

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by biglentil
                      I understand why you called yourself newguy, you must of been born yesterday.
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	mic drop.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	24.8 KB
ID:	771687..............

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...