• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The end of the turd

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • furrowtickler
    replied
    Originally posted by WiltonRanch View Post
    At least Chrétien Martin et al. were/are capable businessmen, lawyers, and seasoned in realpolitik. The dumpster fire now does not have real world experience like that and is running more on ideology. Pragmatism is dead from the shoulders up here. Throw in the influence from the NDP in this past govt is akin to Broadbent holding Trudeau captive. Unless inroads are made in the 905 and 416, there will be another minority. A majority for the liberals looks unlikely so far but there is still time for the red machine to pull something out. Only thing which could really hurt the liberals is if another black swan pops up.
    Absolutely agree

    Leave a comment:


  • dmlfarmer
    replied
    Originally posted by flea beetle View Post
    If you include the money sent to United Nations agencies as well as “helping other countries deal with climate change” trudeau’s expenditure on foreign aid is around $10 billion rather than the $6 billion you are referring to. That is closer to 6% of gni than the 3% you were touting.

    Source Spencer Fernando article March 20th, 2017
    So you feel you can call me out for not providing a 2020 chart with 2020 data included yet you base your claim on a 2017 opinion article with no details on where the figures came from? And if you are adding in UN contributions for Trudeau, do tell what was the amount Harper contributed through the UN if you are going to compare?

    Leave a comment:


  • WiltonRanch
    replied
    At least Chrétien Martin et al. were/are capable businessmen, lawyers, and seasoned in realpolitik. The dumpster fire now does not have real world experience like that and is running more on ideology. Pragmatism is dead from the shoulders up here. Throw in the influence from the NDP in this past govt is akin to Broadbent holding Trudeau captive. Unless inroads are made in the 905 and 416, there will be another minority. A majority for the liberals looks unlikely so far but there is still time for the red machine to pull something out. Only thing which could really hurt the liberals is if another black swan pops up.

    Leave a comment:


  • flea beetle
    replied
    And as for Harper, he spent his term as prime minister cutting foreign aid from the previous 2 liberal prime ministers. As the withdrawal from Afghanistan shows, you can not just pull out of a country once you are there. You have to wean them off slowly and responsibly.

    Leave a comment:


  • furrowtickler
    replied
    Tax payers money wasted on that IN seat by Trudeau was completely worth booting him from PM . He never stood a chance and pranced around throwing your kids and grandkids futures away for nothing

    Leave a comment:


  • flea beetle
    replied
    If you include the money sent to United Nations agencies as well as “helping other countries deal with climate change” trudeau’s expenditure on foreign aid is around $10 billion rather than the $6 billion you are referring to. That is closer to 6% of gni than the 3% you were touting.

    Source Spencer Fernando article March 20th, 2017

    Leave a comment:


  • furrowtickler
    replied
    All I know is that Canada has a failed experiment in politics right now

    A failed drama teacher that’s never had to work for a dime in his life and a journalist running a nation into the ground .
    This needs to change

    Leave a comment:


  • dmlfarmer
    replied
    Originally posted by caseih View Post
    thats good tho , right chuck, dml ?leaving the weapons for the slaughtering crew??????????????
    Why are you asking me? I have not posted anything about the Afghanistan, the withdrawal, or equipment abandonment on this thread or any thread. What are you trying to insinuate by dragging me into this? Can't you provide your own thoughts on any subject instead of trying to put words into someone else's mouth. If you think it is good, leave it at that. I certainly don't feel that way!
    Last edited by dmlfarmer; Aug 23, 2021, 10:02.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sheepwheat
    replied
    Originally posted by jazz View Post
    And Trudeaus response, double down and sound like a fool in the process. Fck Canada what is wrong with you?

    https://twitter.com/BryanPassifiume/status/1429799582616231941
    Wow that was almost as bad as the paper water box kind of things response.

    Leave a comment:


  • jazz
    replied
    Originally posted by Hamloc View Post
    The Liberal’s are starting to get worried, Chrystia Freeland is now putting manipulated videos on her Twitter feed:www.cbc/news/politics/twitter-labels-freeland-tweet-manipulated-media-1.6149734.
    And Trudeaus response, double down and sound like a fool in the process. Fck Canada what is wrong with you?

    https://twitter.com/BryanPassifiume/status/1429799582616231941

    Leave a comment:

  • Reply to this Thread
  • Return to Topic List
Working...