• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"Contract squeeze worries farmers " is the WP headline

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #91
    Originally posted by farmboy44 View Post
    risk is a factor I know Cargills cheque is more likely to cash than some brokers or feedlots out there
    Bingo again.

    And that is because Cargill is not speculating on the grain you sold them, whereas the feedlot could be open to unlimited risk and loss if they don't also have the cattle price and grain price locked in. Although most modern feedlots also hedge everything when possible.

    Comment


      #92
      Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
      Why can't you wait until the grain is in the bin to sign a contract that you know you can deliver on?

      Why are so many farmers so eager to sell into what historically is the lowest markets of the year?
      Winters are for Mexico, spring is for seeding, summers are for the lake.

      But really.. Cash flow, bills due, bin space.

      Comment


        #93
        Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
        Bingo again.

        And that is because Cargill is not speculating on the grain you sold them, whereas the feedlot could be open to unlimited risk and loss if they don't also have the cattle price and grain price locked in. Although most modern feedlots also hedge everything when possible.
        it’s a shame that whether or not the guy who is paying us is going to be good for it has to be such a factor in marketing


        But by that measure; the graincos could say it’s a shame that the whether or not the guy who is supplying the grain is going to be good for it is such a factor as well

        We expect buyers to uphold their end of the deal… should we be surprised they expect the same?

        Comment


          #94
          Originally posted by farmboy44 View Post
          it’s a shame that whether or not the guy who is paying us is going to be good for it has to be such a factor in marketing


          But by that measure; the graincos could say it’s a shame that the whether or not the guy who is supplying the grain is going to be good for it is such a factor as well

          We expect buyers to uphold their end of the deal… should we be surprised they expect the same?
          It is a big factor in my marketing of feed grain. I will happily take a slightly lower price and deliver grain myself at the elevator vs using a broker(s) and 3rd party trucking.
          Knowing that I WILL get paid, knowing their won't be discrepancies in the scale tickets, knowing that grade issues and potential discounts will be known and dealt with immediately, and paper blended with all other loads, knowing that the load will be sampled properly, not one handful off the top, or bottom representing 44 tonnes, not risking that any of the brokers and the end user involved go insolvent before I get paid.

          Many times I have feed grain cheques of amounts less than proper. When confronted with the mistake, they make it right, but don't offer any excuse, it seems to be just throw it at the wall and see what sticks, most must not notice, so they keep trying?

          Comment


            #95
            I guess every area is different but as a rule we never commit a bushel to a contract before it’s grown and in the bin and haven’t had any issues with fall delivery if we desire to do so. Usually start delivering cereals in mid December to a small degree followed by pulses and oil seeds in February to June. South central sask. Everyones need for cashflow is different but as some have said here there are some very useful tools to meet those needs without making physical sales during or immediately following harvest.

            Comment


              #96
              [QUOTE=farmboy44;502712]I was agreeing with bucket alluding to if producers get a bail out for things going against them this year, why shouldn’t graincos get to argue it the opposite way another year. Bad precedent

              Why didn’t you get the futures price plus posted basis? Where you the fella who left his july futures unpriced until June 30? Last traded price and highest bid are two very different things when volume is gone and it’s expiry day. I explained it a few weeks ago I can did up the post.

              If graincos spec for feed barley weight is 50lbs that is because they have export sales and 1cw spec is 50lbs… 303g. Domestic feedlots likely have a bit softer spec, Ill be marketing some to them if I have weight issues but again, risk is a factor I know Cargills cheque is more likely to cash than some brokers or feedlots out there

              Grade risk is BRUTAL. Don’t know what our price is when we sign up because we don’t know the spread because we don’t know the quality.. played the durum game for years learned not to lock in a 1[/QUOTE


              Yes I “where” the fella
              I had a locked in basis , a contract that said I could sell up to the last day at 11:00 am at +62 plus posted July futures
              No where did it say there had to be a buyer ?
              Not my *** problem ? There was obviously a sale at that price?
              They made the contract

              Comment


                #97
                Farmers have other alternatives to marketing and hedging their grain, rather than pricing their grain they could sign a basis contract and sell a futures contract with a commodity firm instead. Canola, oats and wheat all have a futures month specified in the contract, barley could be hedged using corn instead. It’s much easier to get out of a futures contract than a grain companies contract. Special grains are definitely a problem and should probably be not signed without a AOG.

                I haven’t sold any grain I haven’t harvested for many years without AUG but have signed basis contracts ahead of time, in fact most years I usually wait till I find a good basis and price the futures last. Canola, wheat and oats I have hedged thru a broker ahead of harvest if prices are attractive.

                Comment


                  #98
                  [QUOTE=caseih;502729]
                  Originally posted by farmboy44 View Post
                  I was agreeing with bucket alluding to if producers get a bail out for things going against them this year, why shouldn’t graincos get to argue it the opposite way another year. Bad precedent

                  Why didn’t you get the futures price plus posted basis? Where you the fella who left his july futures unpriced until June 30? Last traded price and highest bid are two very different things when volume is gone and it’s expiry day. I explained it a few weeks ago I can did up the post.

                  If graincos spec for feed barley weight is 50lbs that is because they have export sales and 1cw spec is 50lbs… 303g. Domestic feedlots likely have a bit softer spec, Ill be marketing some to them if I have weight issues but again, risk is a factor I know Cargills cheque is more likely to cash than some brokers or feedlots out there

                  Grade risk is BRUTAL. Don’t know what our price is when we sign up because we don’t know the spread because we don’t know the quality.. played the durum game for years learned not to lock in a 1[/QUOTE


                  Yes I “where” the fella
                  I had a locked in basis , a contract that said I could sell up to the last day at 11:00 am at +62 plus posted July futures
                  No where did it say there had to be a buyer ?
                  Not my *** problem ? There was obviously a sale at that price?
                  They made the contract
                  Lol yikes. It absolutely is your problem. You made the contract specifically stating you wanted to retain ownership of the futures and only lock in the basis. So you need a buyer for the futures, not them.

                  I can Gaurentee your contract isn’t for the “posted July futures” it is for the highest price someone is willing to pay. I thought I explained it pretty well last time but I’ll see if a second time will get it through to you.

                  The one correct thing you stated is that the last trade for the July futures took place at the posted bid, let’s say it was 900 dollars. That does not mean the highest price available for you to sell the futures YOU SPECIFICALLY RETAINED OWNERSHIP OF is 900 dollars.

                  Once again, I’ll use a common stock example to try to simplify it for you. Your problem is you think the posted bid and the highest price available to sell at are the same thing.

                  If you own enbridge shares and they are currently priced at $75, that means the last transaction took place at $75. If you want to sell at $75, what happens if the highest bidder is only $74.95? Should you get $75? Now imagine that if regular stocks also could only go down $5 per day. On a day it goes down a full $5, buyers know the value is likely to keeps going down, so instead of bidding $70 they only bid 67. Same idea here. YOU still own the futures, so you are looking for a buyer, not the grain company. And unfortunately there isn’t a buyer at the price you want

                  I couldn’t comprehend actually pricing my grain on a basis contract and holding the futures component until the last day that contract is on the board. There would be literally next to zero volume left. Just wow. Guys don’t know what their pricing or the complexities of the market yet have the audacity to blame others for being naive

                  Seriously, you don’t understand this marketing tool and you should get it the hell out of your toolbox.
                  Last edited by farmboy44; Jul 24, 2021, 11:28.

                  Comment


                    #99
                    Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
                    Bingo again.

                    And that is because Cargill is not speculating on the grain you sold them, whereas the feedlot could be open to unlimited risk and loss if they don't also have the cattle price and grain price locked in. Although most modern feedlots also hedge everything when possible.
                    Bingo bingo bingo get ready to accept what ever
                    Screw job goes your way because at least you ll
                    Get paid the screwing. Lmao

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by the big wheel View Post
                      Bingo bingo bingo get ready to accept what ever
                      Screw job goes your way because at least you ll
                      Get paid the screwing. Lmao
                      In your area, is it actually impossible to deliver off combine in harvest without a contract? Crushers for sure I know usually can’t but with how much primary space there is now days generally someone is willing to take, although that is a luxury which you usually pay for by accepting a lower price. Just wondering if option is available elsewhere?

                      Comment


                        furrow, I certainly dont think the forward contracting is only on farmers shoulders, the graincos bear some blame especially this yr.

                        But I would just like to know what are the immediate expenses after harvest that a $1M CCGA advance wouldnt take care of for the average farm? Land and machine payments can be staggered over the yr if you ask your lender. Ours is in June after we have had 8 months to move crop. FCC and Scotia have input lines not due until Feb. BMO even had their own cash advance type program for stored crop. Sometimes I even have used my stock margin account to park expenses.

                        Now maybe things are different on 20,000 acre farms, but by my calculations, any combination of those programs should defer your immediate expenses way off until after xmas for most average sized growers.

                        But maybe I am out to lunch.
                        Last edited by jazz; Jul 24, 2021, 11:33.

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Hamloc View Post
                          Very interesting thread.

                          Favourite quote so far “The silent majority of us don’t want to see the rest of us fund some bailout for others unfavourable decisions.” Well said.

                          One other well made point was that Agristability was designed to benefit accountants not farmers, for the most part this is true.

                          As far as the contract a farmer signs when you forward contract grain, how many on here have read them? I have to admit I have only fully read one. There was more than one interesting clause but the one that sticks out in my mind and I am paraphrasing from memory, if a producer is unable to fully deliver on the contract the grain company is entitled to the returns from the producers crop insurance. Now that was not how it was written but the fact of the matter is they are legally entitled once you sign the contract to go after your crop insurance if you don’t have the grain or the money.

                          There is no doubt that favourable barley prices off the combine enticed farmers to forward contract too much barley. Also no doubt that in my area at least barley certainly getting hit hard by the drought. Not really sure what the answer is. As a grain company you will look bad if farmers go bankrupt because you had them fulfill their legal obligations and in reality it is not their fault, the farmer signed on the dotted line. As for the government bailing out those farmers who over committed, not really fair to those that didn’t. One hell of a mess all around.
                          All AOG contracts DO Not give the grower the right to reset the price when the price is higher than the Contract price agreed on in the Contract, only to make the contact forgiveness only on the full contracted acres, If and only if; total production on all the contracted acres is less than the production sold at the present price if it is higher than the contract price in the AOG contract.

                          A separate contract with a purchased Call option can be bought when the grain is contracted… if the grower needs the right to reset the price to a higher level After the price has risen…
                          AND Normally this reset higher grain price can only be executed once at the time the grower delivery of the contracted grain is assured and complete with all grain production delivery of the contracted grain completed.

                          This is why it is wise for the grain grower to buy their own commodity options /futures positions in there own commodity trading account.
                          Accomplishing this is not inexpensive, easy, nor with out discipline and much Babysitting of the position in the futures account,
                          plus a whole wack of margin money coverage backing most possible positions that reasonable growers would consider decent cost effective coverage.

                          IE:
                          The purchase of a Canola Put option spread:
                          Buy a $900 Nov21
                          sell a Nov 21 $750 put,
                          and then sell a $1000 call to make this worth doing with a decent return and coverage.

                          A strong constitution is required with an understanding banker to be willing to cover the margin that arises in a commodity that can change $50/t the new daily trading limit announced last week without notice of the change…… which means $100/t range possible on a now normal trading day… which now goes from 8pm the night before on the night session… to 1:15pm when the market closes, almost 18 hours a day to babysit.

                          Cheers!



                          PS our Nexera has $10bu/ac. to$25/ac AOG coverage, therefore it is only reasonable that Growers decide if they want the grain buyer to provide the drought or hail risk management.
                          Last edited by TOM4CWB; Jul 24, 2021, 12:21.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by jazz View Post
                            furrow, I certainly dont think the forward contracting is only on farmers shoulders, the graincos bear some blame especially this yr.

                            But I would just like to know what are the immediate expenses after harvest that a $1M CCGA advance wouldnt take care of for the average farm? Land and machine payments can be staggered over the yr if you ask your lender. Ours is in June after we have had 8 months to move crop. FCC and Scotia have input lines not due until Feb. BMO even had their own cash advance type program for stored crop. Sometimes I even have used my stock margin account to park expenses.

                            Now maybe things are different on 20,000 acre farms, but by my calculations, any combination of those programs should defer your immediate expenses way off until after xmas for most average sized growers.

                            But maybe I am out to lunch.
                            Nope your not at all .
                            But each farm is unique
                            Most around here do contracts for many different reason and it’s not like they are contracting their entire production, which seems to be a false presumption here .
                            Utilizing programs as you mentioned is done on most farm plus contracting at least some grain for bin space and cash flow as a whole .
                            Over the past several years contracted grain has paid well for movement before December
                            Hauling every bushel in mid winter is not fun either in 30-40 below and snow
                            I would far rather contract 20% and move it in good weather than stuff grain bags and deal with that all winter . But each to their own
                            Unfortunately this year the 20% of average yield contracts are now 50-100% of production. Has not happened in 20 years unless hail wiped one out
                            Hind site is 20/20 .

                            And again over the past 10 years , especially the past few , the only grain accepted at most elevators was contracted grain
                            Even if you have enough bin space it is a good practice to at least move out some from each bin , or roll it if you have that luxury, before December.
                            Last edited by furrowtickler; Jul 24, 2021, 12:28.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by TOM4CWB View Post
                              All AOG contracts DO Not give the grower the right to reset the price when the price is higher than the Contract price agreed on in the Contract, only to make the contact forgiveness only on the full contracted acres, If and only if; total production on all the contracted acres is less than the production sold at the present price if it is higher than the contract price in the AOG contract.

                              A separate contract with a purchased Call option can be bought when the grain is contracted… if the grower needs the right to reset the price to a higher level After the price has risen…
                              AND Normally this reset higher grain price can only be executed once at the time the grower delivery of the contracted grain is assured and complete with all grain production delivery of the contracted grain completed.

                              This is why it is wise for the grain grower to buy their own commodity options /futures positions in there own commodity trading account.
                              Accomplishing this is not inexpensive, easy, nor with out discipline and much Babysitting of the position in the futures account,



                              plus a whole wack of margin money coverage backing most possible positions that reasonable growers would consider decent cost effective coverage.

                              IE:
                              The purchase of a Canola Put option spread:
                              Buy a $900 Nov21
                              sell a Nov 21 $750 put,
                              and then sell a $1000 call to make this worth doing with a decent return and coverage.

                              A strong constitution is required with an understanding banker to be willing to cover the margin that arises in a commodity that can change $50/t the new daily trading limit announced last week without notice of the change…… which means $100/t range possible on a now normal trading day… which now goes from 8pm the night before on the night session… to 1:15pm when the market closes, almost 18 hours a day to babysit.

                              Cheers!



                              PS our Nexera has $10bu/ac. to$25/ac AOG coverage, therefore it is only reasonable that Growers decide if they want the grain buyer to provide the drought or hail risk management.
                              Or we could just let the onus be on the buyer to buy and pay for all of this???? But no can’t do that
                              It would be too simple and too much less stress on the farmer.

                              Comment


                                And how much would you like to pay for that? You would never know. You can do it cheaper.

                                Comment

                                • Reply to this Thread
                                • Return to Topic List
                                Working...