Well we all know he bought USA$$$, maybe he could buy some condos while living there.
							
						
					Announcement
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	
		
			
				No announcement yet.
				
			
				
	
Pallister Steals Xmas
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Thats interesting, which category of comorbidities did you choose to ignore?Originally posted by dmlfarmer View PostHey Jazz, you know how you predicted in August that the virus would disappear after November 4th and that deaths were not going to go up in the US - This week Corvid 19 has become the number one cause of deaths in the US.
 
 Can't wait until January 1 to see if Covid will be in the news because if it is, you pledged to leave this forum.
 
 Because Johns Hopkins has shown no increase in overall deaths in the US. If a new condition emerged that was a separate significant cause of mortality, that would have shown. Nobody extra is dying.
 
 So we know just what the cdc told us 3 months ago. Only a small fraction of covid deaths are attributed to covid. Everything else is wrapped up in all cause mortality.
 
 I was a hell of a lot closer than your 400M death estimate.
 
 But please, go ahead and rebut Johns Hopkins.
 
 https://web.archive.org/web/20201126163323/https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/11/a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-due-to-covid-19 A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Easily. Johns Hopkins ( the actual university, not the independent student newspaper) called you dangerous and a conspiracy theorist of the absolute worst kind. Go ahead and rebut that.Originally posted by jazz View PostThats interesting, which category of comorbidities did you choose to ignore?
 
 Because Johns Hopkins has shown no increase in overall deaths in the US. If a new condition emerged that was a separate significant cause of mortality, that would have shown. Nobody extra is dying.
 
 So we know just what the cdc told us 3 months ago. Only a small fraction of covid deaths are attributed to covid. Everything else is wrapped up in all cause mortality.
 
 I was a hell of a lot closer than your 400M death estimate.
 
 But please, go ahead and rebut Johns Hopkins.
 
 https://web.archive.org/web/20201126163323/https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/11/a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-due-to-covid-19 A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19
 
 "The Editors-in-Chief decided to delete the article because of these urgent concerns, explaining on social media that the piece was being taken out of context and used to spread dangerous misinformation."
 
 https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/12/on-the-retraction-of-a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-and-our-coverage-of-covid-19 https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/12/on-the-retraction-of-a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-and-our-coverage-of-covid-19
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 If they wanted to throw fuel on the conspiracy theory fire, I can't think of a better way than to delete an article that doesn't support the narrative. Regardless of where you stand on this issue, that just makes it look like someone has something to hide.Originally posted by tweety View PostEasily. Johns Hopkins ( the actual university, not the independent student newspaper) called you dangerous and a conspiracy theorist of the absolute worst kind. Go ahead and rebut that.
 
 "The Editors-in-Chief decided to delete the article because of these urgent concerns, explaining on social media that the piece was being taken out of context and used to spread dangerous misinformation."
 
 https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/12/on-the-retraction-of-a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-and-our-coverage-of-covid-19 https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/12/on-the-retraction-of-a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-and-our-coverage-of-covid-19
 
 Now can someone attempt to debunk the statistic in the original article instead? Last time I looked into it, there were excess deaths, which is contrary to what this article states.
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 more BS. I have never made any death estimates and certainly not 400M.Originally posted by jazz View PostThats interesting, which category of comorbidities did you choose to ignore?
 
 Because Johns Hopkins has shown no increase in overall deaths in the US. If a new condition emerged that was a separate significant cause of mortality, that would have shown. Nobody extra is dying.
 
 So we know just what the cdc told us 3 months ago. Only a small fraction of covid deaths are attributed to covid. Everything else is wrapped up in all cause mortality.
 
 I was a hell of a lot closer than your 400M death estimate.
 
 But please, go ahead and rebut Johns Hopkins.
 
 https://web.archive.org/web/20201126163323/https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/11/a-closer-look-at-u-s-deaths-due-to-covid-19 A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 I think Pallister must not have wanted another term......
 Mouth in overdrive and brain in neutral.
 Go ahead and think it but don't verbalize it. Filter broke?
 Slow down and choose words wisely.
 It's possible to get your strong opinion/point across with tact and diplomacy.
 
 Frustrated?
 
 All elected political ideologies must be conspiring........ what other logical explanation can there be?
 
 Can't wait for this to be over.....
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Took a lot of words to say scrubbed from the internet because it didnt fit the fear narrative. Now JH is back in form with their scaremongering.Originally posted by tweety View PostEasily. Johns Hopkins ( the actual university, not the independent student newspaper) called you dangerous and a conspiracy theorist of the absolute worst kind. Go ahead and rebut that.
 
 "The Editors-in-Chief decided to delete the article because of these urgent concerns, explaining on social media that the piece was being taken out of context and used to spread dangerous misinformation."
 
 So let me see, a 125 yr old sanctioned publication from the university got censored for the first time.
 
 Give me a break tweety, are you gullible or what.
 
 Anyone with half a brain can see all these deaths from other categories rolled up into covid now.
 
 There is no excess mortality. The total annual deaths are right on par with other years.
 
 From cdc;
 
 2013 2,596,993
 2014 2,626,418
 2015 2,712,630
 2016 2,744,248
 2017 2,813,503
 2018 2,839,205
 2019 2,855,000
 2020 ytd 2,512,880
 
 So if a scary news disease has emerged and taken the top spot, where are the excess deaths?
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Or CTV, editing out the REAL facts that till November 27 only a total of 166 Canadians outside of LTC died. Truth gets out once in a while, it is real hard to keep all the lies straight.
 
 http://https://www.bitchute.com/video/yFPZsm5UteU6/?fbclid=IwAR0E8i1qSvvQ5vZfvSPmCLU8g0E93aL8363htxXM jEZjrN0xjz1jIeE8cSM http://https://www.bitchute.com/video/yFPZsm5UteU6/?fbclid=IwAR0E8i1qSvvQ5vZfvSPmCLU8g0E93aL8363htxXM jEZjrN0xjz1jIeE8cSM
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Flu is real but not a pandemic by any means. If this was so bad we would be dying like flies in the pig barn zapper. If all the political parties are on the same narrative of hysteria there is something more they are working towards and that is their control experiment and by the looks of things most people are following the pied piper. But it will grow old in a hurry when people start losing their jobs, businesses, homes and their freedom and most importantly FOOD. Then the shit hits the fan and governments are scared to death of the chaos that will ensue which was all propagated by their poor financial management. Sometimes u have to say no and special interest groups are just that.....special!
 Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
 
Comment