• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Irrigation Headlines....

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CptnObvious
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 213

    #11
    Yup, that's why Quebec farmers laugh at us. They have one voice, the union, because everyone must join. Politicians know what farmers think and can work with them. Out west we have a different group( many with their own 'experts') for every side in every issue and politicians just pick the one that's convenient.

    Comment

    • furrowtickler
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2004
      • 21880

      #12
      Originally posted by CptnObvious View Post
      Yup, that's why Quebec farmers laugh at us. They have one voice, the union, because everyone must join. Politicians know what farmers think and can work with them. Out west we have a different group( many with their own 'experts') for every side in every issue and politicians just pick the one that's convenient.
      They can have their union
      Leave me out , I will take the alternative

      Comment

      • bucket
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2008
        • 17027

        #13
        I would be OK with irrigation if it wasn't so lopsided with the funding...

        Private guys have spent their own money developing irrigation and see zero help from the government...


        How is that?

        And if the wannabe guys would put their own money in ....that would be a little more palatable....


        Still ....there will not be any industries associated with irrigation here without corporate welfare....

        Comment

        • LWeber
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2007
          • 1432

          #14
          Originally posted by CptnObvious View Post
          Yup, that's why Quebec farmers laugh at us. They have one voice, the union, because everyone must join. Politicians know what farmers think and can work with them. Out west we have a different group( many with their own 'experts') for every side in every issue and politicians just pick the one that's convenient.
          https://www.upa.qc.ca/en/frequently-asked-questions/

          Farmers are under no legal obligation join the UPA. Membership has always been voluntary. Also, the claim that there is a “farm union monopoly” in Quebec is false. Rather, the Farm Producers Act stipulates that only one union organization is accredited to represent Quebec farmers and collect mandatory dues.

          To obtain this status, an association must demonstrate to the Régie des marchés agricoles et alimentaires du Québec (RMAAQ) that it is representative of all producers and that it fulfils the duties incumbent upon it. Beginning in 1972, and every year thereafter, only the UPA has been able to demonstrate this. Another organization could become the certified association if it demonstrated this representativeness.

          It is worth noting that the UPA is legally required to represent all Quebec farmers—members and non-members—regardless of the size of their business, their type of production, or their region. A number of producers’ groups (12 regional federations and 26 production types) are affiliated with the UPA, and over 90% of Quebec farmers are members.

          __________________________________________________ _______________________

          More bull shit from the left wing whacks....

          Comment

          • bucket
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2008
            • 17027

            #15
            All I know is the current clusterphuck of current farm groups in western Canada ain't doing any good for farmers...

            And the WP is highlighting those retiring from their incompetence that have led us here ...

            Comment

            • CptnObvious
              Senior Member
              • Apr 2014
              • 213

              #16
              I agree with that statement, bucket, some are bang on but nobody listens and others are charging headlong in the wrong direction. Which organizations would you have do what differently?

              Comment

              • bucket
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2008
                • 17027

                #17
                I am not sure more bushels of anything will solve the problems ....

                It's a race to the bottom ....


                Quality has to be be redefined....

                Grain contracts need new standards when you look at farmers investment in storage....

                Why are the grain cos not building storage faster than farmers if there is money in it?

                Comment

                • bucket
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2008
                  • 17027

                  #18
                  In Alberta where the capitalist farmer reigns.......

                  The full list of districts receiving funding, some of which were previously announced:

                  Aetna Irrigation District (Cardston area): $35,163
                  Bow River Irrigation District (Vauxhall area): $1,585,642
                  Eastern Irrigation District (Brooks area): $2,418,872
                  Leavitt Irrigation District (Cardston area): $40,112
                  Lethbridge Northern Irrigation District: $1,098,698
                  Magrath Irrigation District: $116,413
                  Mountain View Irrigation District $37,391
                  Raymond Irrigation District: $271,432
                  St. Mary River Irrigation District: $2,651,848
                  Taber Irrigation District: $547,532
                  United Irrigation District (Cardston area): $262,043
                  Western Irrigation District (Strathmore area): $934,854



                  Sure looks like irrigation is an economic driver....ooops.... i mean government tit sucker


                  How about the government throw in 75 percent of the costs for dryland farmers????

                  Comment

                  • the big wheel
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2017
                    • 3860

                    #19
                    Heard on the radio sort of one sentence about MOUNTAIN WATER will be going into buffalo pound. Is this about farming or does somebody want to sell their cottage for a hefty increase? Lol

                    Comment

                    • Sheepwheat
                      Senior Member
                      • Jun 2017
                      • 3137

                      #20
                      Originally posted by bucket View Post
                      And why does no one ever do the math on the benefits of dryland farming?
                      They come on agriville. And they see there is no benefit to dry land farming. (Wink)

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...