• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Goldman Sachs analysis of the impact of climate change. The result are terrifying

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AlbertaFarmer5
    replied
    Originally posted by dmlfarmer View Post
    Wow strong hypothesis. I guess one way to never be wrong is to never back up your theories is any predictions of outcomes.
    Another way to never be wrong is to keep changing the theory, from global warming, to global cooling, back to global warming, to climate change, to climate crisis, the latter two being a catch all for what used to be known as weather, and are being used to justify, warm, cold, dry, wet, storms, lack of storms, snow storms, el nino's, variability, lack of variability and on and on. Which is an absolutely brilliant strategy, because when the theory is so flexible and all-encompassing, it will always be right, regardless of the outcome.

    Leave a comment:


  • furrowtickler
    replied
    One thing not proven , is that the theory that all the ice is going to melt and going to flood all coastal regions ....that is a theory. And one the is simply being used as a scare tactic..... the new world boogie man .
    Last edited by furrowtickler; Oct 5, 2019, 08:48.

    Leave a comment:


  • furrowtickler
    replied
    Originally posted by dmlfarmer View Post
    Wow strong hypothesis. I guess one way to never be wrong is to never back up your theories is any predictions of outcomes.
    Not my theory at all lol . Just that it may oppose the climate catastrophe club lol ..
    It has been proven throughout a millennium, low sun spot activity does cool the average temp on earth . How much , well , time will . Each event is different as proven by ice core samples that go beck hundreds of thousands of years .

    Leave a comment:


  • dmlfarmer
    replied
    Originally posted by jazz View Post
    Well AOC didnt says this wasnt a possible solution so I assume chuck endorses it as well.



    You know I can deal with radicals like the Taliban or Al Queada. They hunker together in other countries. No biggies. But we have millions of home grown woke radicals among the general population right here and thats terrifying. Not only are they violent and unreasonable, they are working into our govt and institutions.
    Just wondering who you believe are the radicals seeing the screaming woman calling for eating babies in the video was actually a Trump supporter and climate change denier and the entire spectacle was a stunt put together by a right wing group intent on trolling AOC. The group behind it has documented the publicity stunt on their website and twitter. LaRouchePAC trolls AOC LaRouchePAC trolls AOC So since it was in support of Trump, I assume you support her position and the eating of babies too. Am I right Jazz, seeing as when you thought it was a left wing policy you used it to attack Chuck
    Last edited by dmlfarmer; Oct 5, 2019, 06:53.

    Leave a comment:


  • dmlfarmer
    replied
    Originally posted by furrowtickler View Post
    Time will tell
    Wow strong hypothesis. I guess one way to never be wrong is to never back up your theories is any predictions of outcomes.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlbertaFarmer5
    replied
    Originally posted by caseih View Post
    **** chuck , you really need to get out more
    Im wearing long underwear , a touque and 2 coats
    You see, its unseasonably cold outside
    Please go out in your shorts and report back to us
    According to Grassfarmer, I am now responsible to correct you if you post anecdotal weather information in response to a global warming thread.

    So please, refrain from doing so, because it really does hurt our cause. The alarmists use every weather event, regardless of how benign, and precedented it may be, as evidence that global warming is a problem. We need to take the high road on this issue, and avoid using weather events to try to prove anything about climate trends, when the trends themselves are conveniently providing all the evidence one needs to falsify the claims. When we lower ourselves to their level and do the same thing they do, it make us hypocritical when we call them out on it. Let them back themselves into an impossible corner by claiming every weather event is unprecedented, and proof of their theory(impossible because the information is available to everyone to disprove their claims), while the rest of us stick with logic and facts, and give them no ammunition to turn back against us.

    Leave a comment:


  • furrowtickler
    replied
    Originally posted by dmlfarmer View Post
    So how much is global temp going to drop over next 3 to 6 years?
    Time will tell

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest
    Guest replied
    **** chuck , you really need to get out more
    Im wearing long underwear , a touque and 2 coats
    You see, its unseasonably cold outside
    Please go out in your shorts and report back to us

    Leave a comment:


  • dmlfarmer
    replied
    Originally posted by furrowtickler View Post
    Be interesting to see what will be said when the earth cools over the next 3-6 years .
    So how much is global temp going to drop over next 3 to 6 years?

    Leave a comment:


  • rumrocks
    replied
    The climatologists will spin it that Co2 is now causing cooling and must be reduced quicker by increasing the carbon tax. They will eventually have us believing that Co2 draws asteroids toward earth. Fear makes us open our wallets and governments know this.

    Leave a comment:

  • Reply to this Thread
  • Return to Topic List
Working...