Trump Impeachment

[jazz]

I am surprised it took this long , I thought it would have taken 6 months.

The dems will have to give up the Senate to install Harris. She is the tie breaking vote there.

Doesnt really matter, in a years time they will lose it anyway.

Biden is a senile fool and so is anybody who thinks he was a better choice than Trump.

[dmlfarmer]

https://www.aninews.in/news/world/us...0211022234652/

so why is this not on the news 24/7? i wonder?

Probably because MTG introduced HR 57 back on January 21, one day after Biden become president. It was referred to committee and went no where. The same goes for HR 596. 597, 598 which she introduced in August. It was a political stunt and grandstanding by MTG to support her fundraising efforts. But it is nice you, Carlson, and asian news are so current about these resolutions.

And anyone who thinks impeachment of Biden would result in Harris taking over has no understanding of the US political system. Trump was impeached twice, once while in office and Pense never took over. Never in the history of the US has an impeachment of a president on any grounds led to his removal from office.

[burnt]

I am surprised it took this long , I thought it would have taken 6 months ...
... but very predictable the day Biden brought her on over other much more qualified candidates.

"...qualified...?

Within that mistaken presumption, good Sir, lies the common, modern-day error held by disillusioned people of principle.

It is exactly as the redoubtable Tulsi Gabbard stated to Joe Rogan - among others - that they don't want ability.

They want someone they can control. And they knew they couldn't control the fiercely independent and principled Tulsi Gabbard.

Harris' opponents from both within and outside her party claimed that her best assets in her climb to gubernatorial positions were exercised while on her back.

[furrowtickler]

"...qualified...?

Within that mistaken presumption, good Sir, lies the common, modern-day error held by disillusioned people of principle.

It is exactly as the redoubtable Tulsi Gabbard stated to Joe Rogan - among others - that they don't want ability.

They want someone they can control. And they knew they couldn't control the fiercely independent and principled Tulsi Gabbard.

Harris' opponents from both within and outside her party claimed that her best assets in her climb to gubernatorial positions were exercised while on her back.

Gabbard was by far the best choice by miles , and your very correct about who they wanted to control

[Guest]

So you think Ivermectin is okay for covid? Answer the question A5?
How long you been using invermectin? LOL

lol used in the wrong context

[burnt]

Gabbard was by far the best choice by miles , and your very correct about who they wanted to control

If the people would have had a choice between Tulsi Gabbard and The Donald, the Dems would have won the election fair and square.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

lol used in the wrong context

I think that when it is necessary to append every statement with the LOL, to inform the reader that the statement was meant to be comedic, because otherwise no one would realize that intention, then probably communication is not the best line of work to be in. Lol...
Besides, we are laughing at him, not with him.

[furrowtickler]

If the people would have had a choice between Tulsi Gabbard and The Donald, the Dems would have won the election fair and square.

Can’t disagree with that at all