Climate Change Puts Buildings, Coastlines, The North At Most Risk: Report Extreme wea

[AlbertaFarmer5]

***** like button - get rid of it.

You guys are arguing with a POS who thought the CWB paid a premium because Richard Gray peer reviewed it down the hall with UofS profs or like minded alumni.

Grow a pair Chucky - you've been hiding for 12 fn years..

How about I post your home acreage land location from the quarter you reside on. That's the great thing about the old Agriville; you just thought you were hiding. You weren't.

Now that is a little too harsh. Most of us are well aware of who we are arguing with, and his past positions, history and politics. But no need to threaten the poor guy, lets just stick with having some good clean fun at his expense, and learning a thing or two about climate and energy along the way.

It's a win win, Chuck gets to feel righteous, smug and self important, we get entertainment value, and possibly learn something.

Besides, from his new position as a keyboard warrior, at least he is now mostly harmless to farmers livelihoods.

And for goodness sakes don't scare him off. He is our window into how our enemies think, and it is fascinating, and free and effortless to access

[farmaholic]

Don't have to get rid of the "like" button, just move it away from the "reply to" button. And while you're at it put a dislike button up too but far enough away from other buttons so fat fingers don't make mistakes.

[A990]

..what makes a scientific source credible? the average person has no idea the politics involved in research and funding

[LWeber]

You guys are looking so far up your own asses for answers that you don't realize how out of touch you are with the climate science.

You spent most of the last few posts discussing me instead of presenting any evidence from a credible scientific source to prove your point.

Not one Conservative political leader in Canada disagrees with the current climate science, but you eggheads persist in your flat earth views. LOL

***** like button - get rid of it.

You guys are arguing with a POS who thought the CWB paid a premium because Richard Gray peer reviewed it down the hall with UofS profs or like minded alumni.

Grow a pair Chucky - you've been hiding for 12 fn years..

How about I post your home acreage land location from the quarter you reside on. That's the great thing about the old Agriville; you just thought you were hiding. You weren't.

[pgluca]

AlbertaFarmer5 I am obviously persona non grata on this web site Chuck wasn't open minded enough to watch this maybe you will. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYhCQv5tNsQ&feature=youtu.be

Sorry Screwed up the link it should be this: https://youtu.be/oYhCQv5tNsQ

[chuckChuck]

You guys are looking so far up your own asses for answers that you don't realize how out of touch you are with the climate science.

You spent most of the last few posts discussing me instead of presenting any evidence from a credible scientific source to prove your point.

Not one Conservative political leader in Canada disagrees with the current climate science, but you eggheads persist in your flat earth views. LOL

[pgluca]

Yes, I too really admire Chucks dedication to a cause which he obviously feels very strongly about. It is just very puzzling how someone with such strong opinions and beliefs in a cause would put so little effort into understanding and learning everything possible about it. This is not the typical fanatisism when the adherents are so enamoured with something that they live and breath it, and lap up every tidbit of information that is available.

AlbertaFarmer5 I am obviously persona non grata on this web site Chuck wasn't open minded enough to watch this maybe you will. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYhCQv5tNsQ&feature=youtu.be

[chuckChuck]

From the Smithsonian
https://ocean.si.edu/through-time/ancient-seas/sea-level-rise
Over the past 20,000 years or so, sea level has climbed some 400 feet (120 meters). As the climate warmed as part of a natural cycle, ice melted and glaciers retreated until ice sheets remained only at the poles and at the peaks of mountains. Early on, the sea rose rapidly, sometimes at rates greater than 10 feet (3 meters) per century, and then continued to grow in spurts of rapid sea level rise until about 7,000 years ago. Then, the climate stabilized and sea level rise slowed, holding largely steady for most of the last 2,000 years, based on records from corals and sediment cores. Now, however, sea level is on the rise again, rising faster now than it has in the past 6,000 years. The oldest tide gauges and coastal sediment preserved beneath swamps and marshes show that sea level began to rise around 1850, which is right around the time people started burning coal to propel steam engine trains, and it hasn't stopped since. The climate likely started warming as a part of a natural cycle, but the accelerated warming in the last two hundred years or so is due to a rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The resulting rise in sea level is likely twice what we would have seen without the increase in greenhouse gasses due to human activities.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

I for one have to credit chuck for his devotion to his delusion. Not many people with that kind if dedication. But math always seems to get in the way.

Yes, I too really admire Chucks dedication to a cause which he obviously feels very strongly about. It is just very puzzling how someone with such strong opinions and beliefs in a cause would put so little effort into understanding and learning everything possible about it. This is not the typical fanatisism when the adherents are so enamoured with something that they live and breath it, and lap up every tidbit of information that is available.

[fjlip]

So its a climate emergency. Canada has to get down to 2000 levels or whatever to save the planet in 12 years.

1.6% of world's CO2 contribution, if we TOTALLY disappeared the planet would NOT notice! Who gives a SHIT even if it is true, but I also am totally unconvinced a clueless denier.