Solar power is shit

[MBgrower]

I never realized how dirty and inefficient solar panels are? they have a finite life, with diminishing capacity overtime. Plus their fabrication is toxic to the environment, and when they eventual stop producing electricity in 20 years they are thrown into landfills where they will leach toxic elements for years. Even California allows this shit to be dumped into landfills.

They're just as bad for the environment as the high capacity batteries required in electric vehicles.

[Guest]

I never realized how dirty and inefficient solar panels are? they have a finite life, with diminishing capacity overtime. Plus their fabrication is toxic to the environment, and when they eventual stop producing electricity in 20 years they are thrown into landfills where they will leach toxic elements for years. Even California allows this shit to be dumped into landfills.

They're just as bad for the environment as the high capacity batteries required in electric vehicles.

Not relevant mb, not relevant at all
Im sure our expert on here has some “scientific info” that says they compost into rich fertile top soil
Same kinda info that says quebec and BC’s shit is good for the whales
The whole thing is so fn stupid its not even funny

[blackjack]

You can’t make this shit up....Medicine Hat pulls plug on money losing 13 million solar power project.

[Blaithin]

I never realized how dirty and inefficient solar panels are? they have a finite life, with diminishing capacity overtime. Plus their fabrication is toxic to the environment, and when they eventual stop producing electricity in 20 years they are thrown into landfills where they will leach toxic elements for years. Even California allows this shit to be dumped into landfills.

They're just as bad for the environment as the high capacity batteries required in electric vehicles.

I conveniently was just at a solar workshop...

Good modules decline by 80-85% after 20 years. They aren’t done at that point.

They’re capable of paying off their carbon footprint in 4-6 years.

Here’s a fact I found particularly interesting...

NASA is the original driver behind solar power and particularly PV modules. They use it to power satellites as, obviously, there’s no other power source out in space. The satellites they launched in the 60s right at the beginning still have functioning modules. Which puts paid to the idea they’re done after 20 years. Although it would be interesting to know how often people have landed on the satellites to perform maintenance and repairs but considering the cost and time required to do that I’m going to assume not that much. If baby solar technology from the 60s can still be going 50 years later then the more advanced modules available now can definitely manage that. No matter what solar hating article you might read saying solar has a poor lifespan, functioning 50 year old satellites say otherwise.

Also the solar pioneer in Alberta (maybe even Canada?) put his panels up in 1995 and they’re still going strong.

Not that that means solar doesn’t have its negative aspects, but what doesn’t.

[blackjack]

Blaiten I have no problem you using solar just spend your own money on it.Tell you a little story Blaithin I spent my own money on putting solar water systems twenty years ago in dugouts.Long story short I found the up keep when running miles and miles made it a very expensive trial and error.Good luck to you though on your venture.

[Blaithin]

Blaiten I have no problem you using solar just spend your own money on it.Tell you a little story Blaithin I spent my own money on putting solar water systems twenty years ago in dugouts.Long story short I found the up keep when running miles and miles made it a very expensive trial and error.Good luck to you though on your venture.

Thanks. I’m not in a position to even think about implementing solar myself. I just like to learn. Figure it never hurts to go to workshops and listen to what people have to say, you’ll usually come away having learnt something.

I would hesitate to judge today’s solar on the solar of 20 years ago. Even if for no other reason than cost. I believe prices in the early 90’s were something like $76/watt just for the modules. In comparison today you can get the entire system - installed, frame, modules, inverter, etc. for under $3/watt in most areas around here. Then there’s the fact that the more a technology is used the more is learnt about it, the more efficient it can become and the more diverse, consistent and successful it’s uses can be.

Solar won’t fit for everyone or in every type of set up but it’s leaps and bounds from what it was. Hell, just think how much we’ve changed in 20 years!

[blackjack]

Fair enough Blaithin, technology has helped us farmers and ranchers grow an abundance amount of food for our society today.In my short almost six decades on Mother Earth I’ve went from feeding cattle off the stone boat with my dad to feeding several hundred cows in a couple of hours.Another quick example of technology is the def emissions on the tractors just traded my chore tractor off it was going to cost me thousands to fix the problem.That was after at least three times the dealership had to come out to fix while on warranty. I know we are to believe all this new technology is going to make us greener but like you say can’t afford the cost.

[jimmy]

I conveniently was just at a solar workshop...

Good modules decline by 80-85% after 20 years. They aren’t done at that point.

They’re capable of paying off their carbon footprint in 4-6 years.

Here’s a fact I found particularly interesting...

NASA is the original driver behind solar power and particularly PV modules. They use it to power satellites as, obviously, there’s no other power source out in space. The satellites they launched in the 60s right at the beginning still have functioning modules. Which puts paid to the idea they’re done after 20 years. Although it would be interesting to know how often people have landed on the satellites to perform maintenance and repairs but considering the cost and time required to do that I’m going to assume not that much. If baby solar technology from the 60s can still be going 50 years later then the more advanced modules available now can definitely manage that. No matter what solar hating article you might read saying solar has a poor lifespan, functioning 50 year old satellites say otherwise.

Also the solar pioneer in Alberta (maybe even Canada?) put his panels up in 1995 and they’re still going strong.

Not that that means solar doesn’t have its negative aspects, but what doesn’t.

Has space got the same climate as in temperature fluctuations like we do on earth? Wind snow rain ice? I would think there are many factors to figure in on life of a panel. Just asking

[chuckChuck]

My solar system is sized to cover my average annual usage. Most of the year I produce more than I can use except when our aeration fans are running in August September. So when I produce surplus electricity it goes into the grid for someone else to use. When the sun is not shining I use the grid. In effect I produce enough solar electricity to cover our annual usage.

Those who worry about the small subsidy should know that farmers are being subsidized in Saskatchewan by Sask Power. Farms don't pay the full cost of delivering electricity to farms. In fact they get a lower rate than residential customers even though the cost of building and maintaining a large rural grid system is much higher. So if you want to argue about the subsidies lets compare unsubsidized farm rates which will be really high vs the cost of solar pv.

Solar systems work well and the long term cost of solar electricity is already much cheaper than current Sask Power farm rates.

[Guest]

Fair enough Blaithin, technology has helped us farmers and ranchers grow an abundance amount of food for our society today.In my short almost six decades on Mother Earth I’ve went from feeding cattle off the stone boat with my dad to feeding several hundred cows in a couple of hours.Another quick example of technology is the def emissions on the tractors just traded my chore tractor off it was going to cost me thousands to fix the problem.That was after at least three times the dealership had to come out to fix while on warranty. I know we are to believe all this new technology is going to make us greener but like you say can’t afford the cost.

Yea and then as soon as the warranty is over dealer tells you to delete it
So you pay extra to buy this new machine with def when you purchase it
Then you suffer MANY DEF breakdowns while on warranty , and pay dealer service call mileage and time while on warranty
Then you pay $3-5 k to delete it , but yea it sounds good on paper
Was talking to a local trucker , def breakdowns broke him
So yea farmers are getting shafted over and over on this def bullshit