Oh Oh Kenney got caught

[Guest]

I dont think anyone argues against climate change , always has , always will . Just funny to watch the arrogant pricks that think they can control climate , lol

[foragefarmer]

AB5
Not sure where you got the idea that I support any of them? I've stated numerous times that none of the political parties represent my views, as an extreme fiscal conservative, and moderate social liberal. I want government to stay out of my pockets, and my bedroom. None of them on paper or in reality come close to that. And to make matter worse, the supposed right parties always get tangled up with the even crazier religious right. I don't vote, I don't belong to any political party.


You may not support any political party, but you sure beat up on anything center left, and are oh so noticeably quite regarding the right!

"And to make matter worse, the supposed right parties always get tangled up with the even crazier religious right."

AB5 you best be careful with that comment, Sheepwheat, Oliver88 , Burnt and of coarse Mr God Bless you himself Tom4$$$$4Tom may take offence. TOM were you not heavily involved with the Brian Jean camp when he was leading the Wild Rose party? Are you still a big supporter of the UCP, now that it's out your man Jean was duped by Jason?

You have to admire the Righties when they realize they can't win an election they change their political name to hide the stench.

Reform/Alliance/Conservative, Conservative/ Sk Party Conservative/WildRose/UCP

Blackjack
Answer to your question is NONE, I don't Swear Allegiance to any party unlike the Far Righties do on Agriville

[AlbertaFarmer5]

You may not support any political party, but you sure beat up on anything center left, and are oh so noticeably quite regarding the right!

I'm really not sure how to be quite regarding of something, could you provide an example of something I have said perhaps?

AB5 you best be careful with that comment, Sheepwheat, Oliver88 , Burnt and of coarse Mr God Bless you himself Tom4$$$$4Tom may take offence.

Not the least bit afraid of offending them, seems like they have thick enough skin to fend for themselves, the first three seem like respectable honest folks content to live and let live. And I could care less what they want to practice or believe in the privacy of their own home, just as long as none of them get into politics and start trying to mess with separation of church( or mosque or temple etc.) and state.

A friendly suggestion, to make your posts easier to read when you want to quote someone, if you click on the arrow in the bottom right on an existing post, Agriville will quote that post for you and it comes up in a different font and background colour.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

No, but I see the connection that unites all political parties, and the overwhelming majority of society around the science of climate change. It may not seem so to the huddle here on Agriville who choose to deny scientific evidence but the fact that the very parties and political leaders these posters support don't agree with their views shows how way out on the crazy fringe their ideas are.

I won't get drug into the same old pointless debate, time is firmly on the side of science on this one, let it play out. But you might want to consider what that overwhelming majority, and all those political parties have actually done to show how seriously they take this crisis, vs. the meaningless inconsequential virtue signalling platitudes they speak about. A lot more political points to be earned to take the easy road and support the latest fad or whim of the media and vocal groups, than there is in actually taking the drastic vote killing actions that would be required if they actually took it seriously. As far as I can tell, there are a lot talking the talk, and none so far walking the walk.

[Integrity_Farmer]

"Jason Kenney's imaginary basement apartment"

From a CBC article "A staff member at the retirement community said over the phone that the bungalows do not have bedrooms in the basement, just a single bedroom on the main floor". So let's call it what it is "Jason Kenney's imaginary basement apartment"

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/jason-kenney-alberta-residence-1.4985648

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/jason-kenney-alberta-residence-1.4985648

[Integrity_Farmer]

Jason Kenney Grilled By Liberal MP For Climate Change Views

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/royalwedding/jason-kenney-grilled-by-liberal-mp-for-climate-change-views/vi-AAwUBEx?refvid=AAvfM5k

[dmlfarmer]

I dont think anyone argues against climate change , always has , always will . Just funny to watch the arrogant pricks that think they can control climate , lol

Your right about climate always changing and always will, and I would add for lots of reasons: including solar, volcanic, cyclical, etc etc and ….man!

But I disagree with you saying: "arrogant pricks that think they can control climate." Governments, and organizations are not trying to control climate - they are trying to mitigate man's impact on climate. There is a huge difference. I am not saying we should shut down modern society in the name of climate change - that is ridiculous. But I do believe we should minimize our impact on climate as far as we can. Anyone who disagrees with minimizing man's effects on environment should have to live in the smog of China, or the pollution of India, or have to drink the water of Flint Michigan for a year and before crying that man has no responsibility to mitigate their impact on the environment be it land, water, air, or climate.

Sorry for hijacking this Kenny lovefest, or breaking my promise to myself about commenting ever again on this forum about climate change as I know anything I say will not change anyone's mind or position so why waste the forum's time but caseih claim of CONTROLLING climate is pure propaganda and I had to refute it.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Your right about climate always changing and always will, and I would add for lots of reasons: including solar, volcanic, cyclical, etc etc and ….man!

But I disagree with you saying: "arrogant pricks that think they can control climate." Governments, and organizations are not trying to control climate - they are trying to mitigate man's impact on climate. There is a huge difference. I am not saying we should shut down modern society in the name of climate change - that is ridiculous. But I do believe we should minimize our impact on climate as far as we can. Anyone who disagrees with minimizing man's effects on environment should have to live in the smog of China, or the pollution of India, or have to drink the water of Flint Michigan for a year and before crying that man has no responsibility to mitigate their impact on the environment be it land, water, air, or climate.

Why do you bring up actual physical, dangerous, poisonous, harmful pollution as an argument for supporting climate change? I realise that confusing the two is a well worn tactic that works very well in most circles, but I expected more from you, you are typically very reasonable in your arguments on this topic.

[GALAXIE500]

Luckily no concern of mine. I live in sk . Try and keep up andfor the record i havent been happy since mr devine left

There are diehard NDP'ers and other whining crybabies in this province who still blame Mr. Devine for everything that has happened to them in the last 30 years. Gee what did Lorne do? What did good old Roy do?

Quick answer : cater to unions and back door deals by their friends!

You people in Alberta better wake up and go to the polling station on April 16th.

[Rareearth]

What did Ralph do? Remember the finance minister for the whole of Canada?