Totally clears the President. Thank you

[Jay-mo]

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Chuck, disagreeing isn't what makes you a troll, that is what makes a discussion interesting. Your single minded agenda, lack of constructive input, intolerance, name calling and insulting of anyone who disagrees with you are what make you a troll. Plus, the obvious fact that you have no connection to primary agriculture. You are always welcome to disagree, in fact I have defended your right to do so on here before. Lots of farmers disagree with my viewpoints, and do so with respect and an open mind, and we get along just fine.

[furrowtickler]

chucky, it was about the total number of people watching the inauguration, Spicer said there were more, because he included the TV viewership. Most of Trump's supporters were from middle America, have longer and more expense to travel to the Capital to watch it first hand. Something like 95% of Washington DC voters supported Obama, for most of them, all they had to do was jump on a city bus, most likely with a bus pass they already had. That's why the comparison included the TV viewers.

Now don’t start with all those facts now beaver .... chucky May start throwing fits

[oneoff]

Boils down to directing felonies.....

[jazz]

Boils down to directing felonies.....

How is it a felony to gift someone cash from your private funds. That's basically what trump did.

[beaverdam]

Now Stormy owes Trump's attorneys, 3 times what Trump paid her !

Too funny !

[oneoff]

How is it a felony to gift someone cash from your private funds. That's basically what trump did.

I would suppose that it pertains to what is plead by the accused and accepted by the NY Court as being an illegal electoral campaign contribution. Perhaps Attorney Cohen could tell you better; as he plead guilty to what was considered by the NY Court to be an offense. And as you should also know; attorney Cohen added that he did that illegal act under the direction of the President of the USA.

Which brings a person back to the logical conclusion that the person who paid the money (Individual #1 who used it to silence potential bad news in an election campaign) would logically be seen as directing a felony.