• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wakey Wakey ag farm groups and politicians. Houston we have a Problem.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    i expect governments to help like they do with the auto sector....more recently the steel and aluminum industry...the bombardier family ....the grain industry etc etc...


    You guys know P&H received 10million from the federal government for their flour mill.

    its ****ing disgusting that farmers think getting an adhoc payment is a bad thing while every other industry relies on government help either thru direct help, tax breaks or royalty holidays...

    WTF is wrong with us?????

    Comment


      #17
      It just pisses me off all this bullshit talk about huge yields and just a few guys had poor crops and what it snowed can’t be must be fake news.

      Farm dunk telling every news outlet that will listen it’s hreat spending and seed that farmers are able to boost crops and get big yields with no rain.

      It’s bullshit from all.

      But when their are guys who can’t even get started Harvest that’s awfull.

      But his is Canada we’re all the parasites get covered and the Farmers get the shaft even from our own producer groups.

      Comment


        #18
        how did farms survive when Devine made sure there was money for tough times....ask yourself how many farms would still be here without those payments????

        Comment


          #19
          I agree he worked for farmers.

          But we get slapped with a 50% tarrif and not a peep.

          Yea canada is great

          Comment


            #20
            Wonder if those global ag risk crooks will finally get knocked out of the game. Same as those ICC fools.

            Look all I am saying is if we want change and better risk options, we have to be the instruments of that, not govt. Devine may have supported farmers but he did the same thing Trudeau is doing now, just taking funds from debt and transferring them to affected groups. We know that bill will come due one day.

            Comment


              #21
              You also have to remember that although Devine's payment was helpful it also brought about substantial change in agriculture.....direct seeding, changing or rotations, etc...but now we have sort of hit a wall as to what more can be done...

              Bigger drills? more acres? higher yields? the return on investment have not kept pace ....so if you want a healthy farm industry that attracts youth to the farm....someone better figure a new path pretty quick or a real generation of innovative farmers will simply walk away...

              And the end result will be corporate agriculture will eventually be asking for more help than the current set of farmers are asking for.

              Comment


                #22
                Originally posted by bucket View Post
                Bigger drills? more acres? higher yields?
                100% NO - That is not the way forward. Chasing higher yeilds brings more risk, then an event like this occurs and we get hung out to dry. Or a market goes south and we get stung.

                The solution will be more of a hybrid approach. Its the only path that is sustainable. Diversifying and not just crops types but farming methods as well. Other income. Actual investing in something other than depreciating iron or expensive dirt.

                Learning proper tools to hegde market risk and I dont mean crop insurance.
                Last edited by jazz; Sep 23, 2018, 14:46.

                Comment


                  #23
                  I agree somewhat but when,

                  Railways fail farmers,

                  Grain companies fail farmers,

                  Seed deals fail farmers,

                  Equipment consolidations fail farmers

                  Chem company and Fert consolidation monopoly creations fail farmers,

                  Unions who load ships or run trains or buy grain fail farmers

                  Banks who ramp up on boom and Claw on fall

                  Politicians who want the media shot but do nothing

                  Farm groups who just want check and Holliday and do nothing

                  Crap insurance programs that are from 1870s logic

                  Ag stab that has no substance but if you do get you pay it back a few years later.

                  Finally other countries farmers come first Canada all the parasites are first farmers last

                  Sad really.

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Not canadian shouldnt comment but i dont disagree with some of jazz's philosophies.

                    Here in oz big shift back to mixed farming in lower rainfall higher risk farming areas

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by malleefarmer View Post
                      Not canadian shouldnt comment but i dont disagree with some of jazz's philosophies.

                      Here in oz big shift back to mixed farming in lower rainfall higher risk farming areas

                      I spent nearly a decade in the patch analyzing business deals and I can tell you honestly there is no company on the planet that would take the kind of risk ag does without a true backstop. We will never have one here so we need to think different.

                      My parents and grandparents all worked mixed farms. Not saying they were super successful anything, but they always had another income in case primary grain income failed. And it failed often.

                      That doesnt mean we have to load up on cows and chickens, but how many farmers own stock or ancillary businesses. My accountant says I should own stock in the ag companies. Expansion to most farmers always means more land and iron. We should be changing that paradigm.

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by jazz View Post
                        I spent nearly a decade in the patch analyzing business deals and I can tell you honestly there is no company on the planet that would take the kind of risk ag does without a true backstop. We will never have one here so we need to think different.

                        My parents and grandparents all worked mixed farms. Not saying they were super successful anything, but they always had another income in case primary grain income failed. And it failed often.

                        That doesnt mean we have to load up on cows and chickens, but how many farmers own stock or ancillary businesses. My accountant says I should own stock in the ag companies. Expansion to most farmers always means more land and iron. We should be changing that paradigm.
                        Good and now you can start telling steelworkers they should have something other than EI backstopping them for an extended period....

                        How about we just let everyone stand on their own instead of governments buying pipelines or building them...

                        Better yet how about the Rider organization build their own stadium...

                        Or not build a stupid ****ing transportation hub in the middle of ****ing nowhere...and waste a billion building infrastructure into a failed venture....and then use the media to get farmers to use it ...idiotic. ..

                        And as I have said before other generations have had adhoc payments to keep their farms alive maybe even your parents and grandparents farm that allows you to farm today...

                        Just a little ignorant to forget some facts. ..because I find it hard to believe your parents didn't receive any adhoc payments
                        Last edited by bucket; Sep 23, 2018, 16:19.

                        Comment


                          #27
                          If primary grain production can't stand on it's own without outside support and I'm talking off farm jobs and other related enterprises...why ****en bother. I wonder how many other people's businesses have the same amount of capital invested, and risk taken, as in our farms have to flip ****en burgers somewhere to make ends meet. ****en greedy pricks taking too much for machinery and inputs and cheap bastards not paying up for what we produce. If we could keep more and get more money on both sides of that scenario we'd be better off. Weather issues is a whole different story and adequate risk management is paramount.

                          Comment


                            #28
                            " If we even got Trudeau's attention, he would just come out and lecture us on climate change."
                            Shit he might cry on my swaths and get them wetter!

                            Only subsidy in the 70's was $2/acre for SMF, Otto Lang, LIFT! 1CWRS was 60 cents a bushel and only a 4 bushel quota.
                            Oh but we had Western Grains Stabilization and two price wheat, SFA and a few cents more for domestic.

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by jazz View Post
                              Same here, but the prospect of having a thousand acres to get off vs 8,000 is a different beast.

                              Here is a little known fact in farming. Risk rises exponentially with the size of your operation. A few BTOs around me learned that lesson in 2010 when all their lentil acres when for mush.

                              Here is another little know fact in farming. You will never get rich growing commodities. Paying big rent, big iron and big inputs and having no equity is a dead end. You will make a buck one year, then give it back the next. Commodities are a distinctly break even prospect. The value is in the land, period and honestly spinning your wheels on un-owned property is insanity.

                              Canada is the only modern country with the most mega farms. More farmers per acreage in EU and USA. Thats why they are supported.
                              I agree, the end game in grain farming is building up equity in land. Some BTOs that farm mostly rented land and aren't slowly buying land over the course of their career are just paying salaries for all the leaches

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Originally posted by fjlip View Post
                                " If we even got Trudeau's attention, he would just come out and lecture us on climate change."
                                Shit he might cry on my swaths and get them wetter!

                                Only subsidy in the 70's was $2/acre for SMF, Otto Lang, LIFT! 1CWRS was 60 cents a bushel and only a 4 bushel quota.
                                Oh but we had Western Grains Stabilization and two price wheat, SFA and a few cents more for domestic.
                                2 dollars then would be 10 dollars today. ...

                                Comment

                                • Reply to this Thread
                                • Return to Topic List
                                Working...