• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Finally....

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • furrowtickler
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2004
    • 21994

    #61
    Grass, nope not at all .
    The point is people have no clue how much money is spent to get that $200,000
    The wage earner spends nothing .
    Help those who stimulate the economy... the wealth creators not the the money exchangers .
    $1,000,000 is not a big number any more on farms .
    That's just a 5000ac farm at $200 / ac
    A lot of farms are much bigger and spend more . All that goes into the economy, all year long .

    Comment

    • sumdumguy
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2007
      • 11995

      #62
      Originally posted by grassfarmer View Post
      Yeah, but it doesn't occur to you that the input suppliers pay tax on the profits they make? You seriously think you should pay less tax on the profit you made because you spent money on inputs.




      It was all there in Jan's OP ED Farma. Maybe your accountant read it too.

      The Government is looking at three specific type of tax evasion:
      Income sprinkling (when corporations pay dividends to family members who do not contribute to the business, for the sole purpose of avoiding taxes).

      Passive investment (when a wealthy person uses their private corporation to make investments in mutual funds, stock markets, bonds, etc. instead of investing under their own name, allowing them to pay less tax and increase their private fortune faster).

      Converting income into capital gains (setting up shell companies and using the corporation’s income to buy and sell shares in these companies, resulting in profits being counted as capital gains from these transactions instead of income from their corporation, and thus taxed at a lower rate).
      When you say "increase their private fortune faster", just remember up to 54% of that fortune is taxed again and actually is the fortune of the government.

      Comment

      • sofa.king
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2026
        • 562

        #63
        Did Omar khadir pay tax on his 10.5 million?

        Comment

        • grassfarmer
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2002
          • 9734

          #64
          Originally posted by furrowtickler View Post
          Grass, nope not at all .
          The point is people have no clue how much money is spent to get that $200,000
          The wage earner spends nothing .
          Help those who stimulate the economy... the wealth creators not the the money exchangers .
          $1,000,000 is not a big number any more on farms .
          That's just a 5000ac farm at $200 / ac
          A lot of farms are much bigger and spend more . All that goes into the economy, all year long .
          When has there ever been a tax system based on turnover versus net profit? What a ridiculous idea. Besides the way I see most of your farming operations you really are just becoming money exchangers. Taking the banks (or Input Credit's) money passing that onto seed, fuel, fertiliser and machinery companies before collecting some back from the big grain Co's and handing it back to the banks/lenders. Having an operation focussed on harnessing solar power, water and soil nutrients through forage harvested by animals and turned into protein really is wealth creation.

          Comment

          • grassfarmer
            Senior Member
            • Jul 2002
            • 9734

            #65
            Originally posted by sofa.king View Post
            Did Omar khadir pay tax on his 10.5 million?
            Nope, apparently legal settlements are not subject to tax.

            Comment

            • Richard5
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2014
              • 469

              #66
              Originally posted by Sodbuster View Post
              Yes, my point being that retained earning in a corp is money that has already had the tax paid on and when that money is pulled out of the company it will be taxed for a 2nd time at what ever your personal tax rate is.
              Sodbuster, you are not totally correct with your statement.

              Unless you have a really bad accountant, when your remove the cash from a company you will pay personal taxes on this, but it is a lesser rate than other normal earnings (Dividends).

              Comment

              • Jagfarms
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2003
                • 871

                #67
                Originally posted by furrowtickler View Post
                Just need to point something out here ...
                Say the farmer makes $200,000 as said , he most likely spent over $1,000,000 on total inputs into the local economy...
                The wage earner spends zero to earn his $200,000 relative to the farmer .
                Most people forget that little tid bit of info or completely ignore it .
                Also that farmer can make zero the next year and still have to spend $1,000,000 on total inputs into the local economy supporting many many jobs while he is called a whiner if he says anything at all by the likes of grassfarmer , or the wage earner who still gets his $200,000 without having to spend a dime to earn that other than fuel to get to work and back .
                Well said furrowtickler

                Comment

                • blackpowder
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 9320

                  #68
                  Grass did say 200k net after wages. Ya sure tax at a reasonable rate.
                  What I see increasingly is this. At one time someone who was doing well from their own initiative was admired or given credit.
                  Now they are looked on with envy or as crooks not deserving of more than anybody else.
                  That is a shift that can only lead to inevitable decay. Key words in some addresses including the NFUs' point to this shift.
                  Loopholes if any, are one thing. Forcing "equality" another.

                  Comment

                  • burnt
                    Banned
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 3918

                    #69
                    Originally posted by blackpowder View Post
                    Grass did say 200k net after wages. Ya sure tax at a reasonable rate.
                    What I see increasingly is this. At one time someone who was doing well from their own initiative was admired or given credit.
                    Now they are looked on with envy or as crooks not deserving of more than anybody else.
                    That is a shift that can only lead to inevitable decay. Key words in some addresses including the NFUs' point to this shift.
                    Loopholes if any, are one thing. Forcing "equality" another.
                    If we listen to sock puppet's arguments for the tax grab, he is clearly trying to frame it as class warfare.

                    Draw your own conclusions.

                    Comment

                    • blackpowder
                      Senior Member
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 9320

                      #70
                      Read an article I can no longer find. Morneaus' company stands to make a killing with some pension products with the changes?


                      Whatever buys votes right?

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...