• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

The solution is ....drumroll please.....

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Oliver88
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2012
    • 4688

    #11
    Originally posted by sumdumguy View Post
    Churchill could have been the goto shipping port but Easterners own the lakers in the St. Lawrence. capeesh?
    Part of the problem for sure.

    CNR did not help get grain efficiently by essentially letting a line or two go to hell through a lack of maintenance as well......which coincidentally has its HQ in Montreal, Quebec.

    Comment

    • Daylate
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2009
      • 588

      #12
      I think the 100's of millions of dollars of rail overage paid to farmers that is going to be used on research to help us create a bigger infrastructure/transportation demand and dump it into the rail line. Any income goes back to rail and port maintenance. Or is this making too much sense?

      Comment

      • bucket
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2008
        • 17024

        #13
        On the old days not only would they haul grain to Churchill they would haul it from Churchill to fill an order.

        Comment

        • samhill
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2009
          • 896

          #14
          The Kewatin Tribal Council has offered to completely repair the line to Churchill. They have the knowhow and experience as they already own the Keewatin Railway and have for sometime. All it takes is for someone to give the OK and pay the cost. I doubt if any other company can do it as well, as quickly and as economically.

          Comment

          • 15444
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2000
            • 2112

            #15
            Originally posted by samhill View Post
            The Kewatin Tribal Council has offered to completely repair the line to Churchill. They have the knowhow and experience as they already own the Keewatin Railway and have for sometime. All it takes is for someone to give the OK and pay the cost. I doubt if any other company can do it as well, as quickly and as economically.
            Indian time is twice as long as white man time and three time as expensive.

            Comment

            • Braveheart
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2001
              • 3257

              #16
              Keewatin tribe
              could definitely fix the line, and cost effectively. Omnitrax just wants a government handout.

              You can blame Omnitrax. After all, Merv Tweed is President and he's not qualified . . . For anything.

              Comment

              • Braveheart
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2001
                • 3257

                #17
                The solution is, hovercrafts. All seasons. All terrain.

                Comment

                • seabass
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2005
                  • 825

                  #18
                  U could run that Port from July1 to end of November if they wanted but like was said earlier the votes come from out east. Same old story. Not whats right for the people who could use it but only right for the people that get elected.

                  Comment

                  • farming101
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2011
                    • 3954

                    #19
                    Where there's a will there's a way.

                    [URL="http://edmontonjournal.com/news/local-news/cn-workers-in-alberta-build-replacement-mayerthorpe-trestle-bridge-in-20-days"]http://edmontonjournal.com/news/local-news/cn-workers-in-alberta-build-replacement-mayerthorpe-trestle-bridge-in-20-days[/URL]

                    Comment

                    • blackpowder
                      Senior Member
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 9259

                      #20
                      Maybe a populous country with a huge military budget wouldve put a nuclear sub base there in the 50s.
                      But canada? For wheat!? For 90 days of use!? We dont need it to show soveriegnty over arctic waters anymore.
                      There is highways over swamp to get to NOLA, but Churchill????
                      Unless you find a large resource to mine nearby. Let it go.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...