• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Professors have ties to Monsanto

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sumdumguy
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2007
    • 12004

    #11
    Originally posted by tweety View Post
    IF there was a true third party arms length watchdog, then yes. But this scumbags' only purpose is very different by attacking scientists and making media articles like the CBC one out of nothing at all to sell overpriced organic food.

    Hundreds of hours of wasted time for hardworking scientists just so people like you sumdum can feel good about yourself trying to take agriculture to the stone age. Despicable.

    Or make people accountable! I am tired of the B.S., yours included!

    Comment

    • tweety
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2014
      • 3059

      #12
      You're delusional.

      Comment

      • westernvicki
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2014
        • 867

        #13
        50-years-ago-sugar-industry-quietly-paid-scientists-to-point-blame-at-fat

        Just in case you missed that in the quote: this was Harvard. Ivy league.

        Everyone has a fiddle.

        Comment

        • westernvicki
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2014
          • 867

          #14
          https://www.google.ca/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja &uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwi-j9nw0-HTAhVl_IMKHeipAfcQjRwIBw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgrist.or g%2Farticle%2F2012-01-12-american-beef-consumption-is-at-a-50-year-low%2F&psig=AFQjCNEhVQDhjfMcWkDEPdL1P8ZLTIunAw&ust =1494379538855766

          And this is the graph if you do not care to down load or google on the changing trends in meat consumption because of the focus on fat being bad for us, taken from this data the quote is
          "-american-beef-consumption-is-at-a-50-year-low".

          Not just sugar benefited from the focus on fat being bad for us meanwhile, poultry was flagged as lean, beef as not.: poultry consumption increases, beef, even after farmers adapt to lean beef, declines.

          Go figure, 50 years later the statictics verify that investing in blaming fat for obesity and poor health worked, focus on fat not sugar, we could graph, obesity, diabetes etc etc, but the proof is research drives agendas. And research is never free.
          Last edited by westernvicki; May 8, 2017, 19:42.

          Comment

          • westernvicki
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2014
            • 867

            #15
            http://www.divineeatingout.com/food-1/sugar-consumption-now-vs-100-years-ago

            Comment

            • SASKFARMER
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2005
              • 7033

              #16
              And CBC is funded by the liberal government

              Comment

              • grassfarmer
                Senior Member
                • Jul 2002
                • 9734

                #17
                Originally posted by SASKFARMER View Post
                And CBC is funded by the liberal government
                And previously by the Conservative Government....your point is?

                Comment

                • tweety
                  Senior Member
                  • Nov 2014
                  • 3059

                  #18
                  Its because Dr Phillips comes from a position of sound science that scumbags like Ruskin and the organic industry go after him - and have found nothing. A few ramblings from Cami and others. they have to keep propagating the lies in order to stay in business. Its disgusting.

                  Ruskin is the scum of the earth attacking Docs like him, Dr Kevin Folta, and others who stand up for truth and science - no matter which companies' feelings are hurt.

                  Comment

                  • pourfarmer
                    Senior Member
                    • Jun 2012
                    • 454

                    #19
                    Originally posted by tweety View Post
                    Its because Dr Phillips comes from a position of sound science that scumbags like Ruskin and the organic industry go after him - and have found nothing. A few ramblings from Cami and others. they have to keep propagating the lies in order to stay in business. Its disgusting.

                    Ruskin is the scum of the earth attacking Docs like him, Dr Kevin Folta, and others who stand up for truth and science - no matter which companies' feelings are hurt.
                    Whats wrong Andy? worried the share price drops? You're quite the biotech cheerleader. Did big M give you pom pom's when they told you to put on that skirt? haha douche bag

                    Comment

                    • westernvicki
                      Senior Member
                      • Mar 2014
                      • 867

                      #20
                      Tweety: Harvard made everyone wonder what is real and what is fake science. The result of Harvard being paid off is a very sound reason lack of trust in safe the net result is: go safe go organic.

                      Ask Cargill<

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...