As I said before the discussion is pointless because unless you are a climate scientist our "opinions" about the science are just hot air.
What is worth discussing is the ability of some to completely disregard the overwhelming scientific evidence that is before them.
It is like we are returning to the dark ages where evidence based decision making is being replaced by fake news, rumour and superstition.
What is worth discussing is the ability of some to completely disregard the overwhelming scientific evidence that is before them.
It is like we are returning to the dark ages where evidence based decision making is being replaced by fake news, rumour and superstition.
Comment