Big News - Financial Post this morning

[burnt]

******

[grassfarmer]

Big News? hardly. You make it sound like the world has just had an epiphany and concluded Climate Change isn't happening when in fact all that's happened is another article by a climate change denier has been published. Don't be fooled that Solomon is cited as "one of Canada's leading environmentalists." - he apparently wrote that Wikipedia piece himself. Seems he is the leader of a far right charity whose focus is on denying Climate Change.
Oh yeah and the claim about 76 or 77 scientists would be another of your alternate facts.

Here is a bigger sample of peer-reviewed scientific opinion to set you straight.

[sumdumguy]

The ducks all filed into a row, but they found out the big bad wolf was leading it.

I am ecstatic about the fact that the waste will end. You doomsdayers can fly a kite.

[sofa.king]

Grasshole you are a real piece of work it's time to realize you've been led down the wrong path.

[bucket]

It took the watershed to the Oroville dam a very short time to refill.....good thing that dam is there....but it also points that maybe a few more are needed. Just think of the future water needs wasted with that event.....


Same thing goes on the Saskatchewan rivers.....

[checking]

The absolute worse thing that can happen is that raw data, like weather data, can be changed/disappear so a study of now alternative facts can confirm what a climatologist wants the public to believe.

Real sad that Gas is okay with that.

[blackpowder]

One more time stooping to a lower level.
Although 97% of all scientists may agree that anthropogenic climate effects may be happening.
An unclear number agree how much and how fast.

[Guest]

Big News? hardly. You make it sound like the world has just had an epiphany and concluded Climate Change isn't happening when in fact all that's happened is another article by a climate change denier has been published. Don't be fooled that Solomon is cited as "one of Canada's leading environmentalists." - he apparently wrote that Wikipedia piece himself. Seems he is the leader of a far right charity whose focus is on denying Climate Change.
Oh yeah and the claim about 76 or 77 scientists would be another of your alternate facts.

Here is a bigger sample of peer-reviewed scientific opinion to set you straight.

[ATTACH]1209[/ATTACH]

Cant win with you deniers that climate change is a hoax to make money for a select few assholes

[grassfarmer]

Cant win with you deniers that climate change is a hoax ....

Because the facts don't support it. You talk about facts and you talk about science but then reject both when they don't support your very fringe views on this topic. Only 1/10th of 1% of the authors of peer reviewed climate change papers reject that it is caused by humans (that doesn't include some of these 1/10th of 1% that may believe in in climate change but not be convinced it's caused by humans).

[furrowtickler]

Fact check - temp reading from satellites in real time data seams to differ from made up ground stations . Huh , who woulda thought ...