Where did vaders post go?

[TOM4CWB]

Parsley,

I too thought C.P. must have found some chocolate easter eggs in his nest!

(; grin... you tooo Mel... When does Charlie get back?

[checking]

Obviously copyrighted material should have been removed; and the poster warned as to why it was inappropriate in the first place. Any appropriate links could have been included by the poster. It was inconsiderate of the poster to pass off another person's opinion in the way it was done.
As soon as I saw this now censored post; it just didn't look right. didn'tcase

[wilagro]

In the past, I have posted copyrighted material, "with permission" from the author. That is what is missing here.

It is not illegal to quote pertinent sections of copyrighted articles, but not the article in total (as a rule).

The posting "with permission", had better be legitimate in all cases.

[parsley]

Most writers are pleased if their efforts are sourced and quoted. Why publish if you want to keep it secret?

The commentators worth their salt will never say a word about their material being quoted as long as they are CREDITED with the words quoted.

Some people are willing to pay for words they want to read.

Most reporters writing commentaries, and newspaper articles have been hired and already paid.

Quoting is made easier if a writer wants people to read his/her message, and people want to read it.

Parsley

[Fransisco]

It is interesting to note whose "copyrighted" material we are talking about here.

Paul Beingessner

What is interesting is that Paul is vigorously enforcing(policing?)his copyrights. Which is the right to the product of his effort, in this case his written work.

However he does not believe that the average grain farmer in Western Canada has the right to the product of their own effort when it comes to wheat and barley. His article argued that when you give farmers this same right, that he himself enjoys, they will make the wrong decision.

Again, what we have here is an anti-choice advocate who along with the likes of Stewart Wells and Rod Flaman believe that you should do as they say not as they do.

[parsley]

I don't think Single Deskers will comprehend the analogy you make..

Reason is much too confusing for those who divide it in half.

Parsley

[Fransisco]

And it is far too unattractive for those who are in love with their contradictions.