Is anyone else tired of our little premier yapping

[mustardman]

Bob nuclear was developed during the 40's to blow people up.
It's not New tech and the ONlY investors it will ever have is govt . Look up money pit in the dictionary and the answer is Nuclear power.
As an investor I mite as well invest in the telegraph system as nuclear

There is a form of nuclear that would work But it's not the form we are using that creates spent fuel rods that we have to find a hiding place for

[bucket]

Caseih

True about the extension of oilsands to saskatchewan.

Stonepicker

The high wages are great until those people end up on government assistance.
If oil had bottomed at 55 bucks a barrel I think it may have worked out better.

[bobofthenorth]

Mustard that is the most juvenile thinking. Any technology can be used for good or evil - a scalpel can as easily cut your jugular as it can remove a tumour.

I assume from your comments that the so-called new technologies which you support are those that can only exist by virtue of massive government subsidies.

[mustardman]

No one invest in nuclear Except Governments
There is no more Expensive energy source

[SASKFARMER3]

One big nuke plant north of PA feeding south should of been built right away! Give local native groups share portion also province a share! We're home of the worlds largest nuke fuel source yet we have none! But again that's the NDP way.
Nothing ever happened here move along leave us be here is a civil servant job welcome to the NDP party.
Never again at least in my life time! They destroyed our province.

[mustardman]

The boundary Dam project has cost $2000 per tonne of Carbon that it has captured!!!!
(But thats ok cause it's helpng the oil industry ...? )

And Mr Wall thinks $ 15 per tonne is too much ??
Time for batteries in your calculator Brad

[LEP]

Mustard, lean cost $1,500 to save a dollar and carbon capture cost $2,000 for every tonne captured.

Sounds like you are reading verbatim from The Commonwealth.

Better find a more accurate source of information.

[mustardman]

Maybe the Truth hurts?
I know sask party doesn't talk about these points but they never seem to admit when they're wrong

Lean facts. $1500 to save a Dollar
Put out by an economist

Carbon capture has been estimated at 625,000 tonnes. Multiply this times $2000 and this gives you the cost of our little project that they've been promoting round the world
Another of Baby face Bill Boyd's Billion Dollar Schemes that doesn't work

[boarderbloke]

mustard, riders, bucket, and any other tree hugging leftist. How much carbon tax are you willing to pay on your farms, for the food you grow to feed all your friends and relatives that live off farms and in the cities, plus all those other people living there that you don't know and will never meet?

How much carbon tax are YOU WILLING to ABORB in the costs of operating your farm to subsidise all the others.

You know damn well that the prices at CBoT, MGE, ICE, KCBT, won't be going up on account you, as a farmer, have to pay the PM SELFIE Carbon TAX.

So, again, How much Carbon Tax are you willing to absorb for the food you grow for others?

[bobofthenorth]

The nuclear argument flushes the socialists out of the woodwork every time. If they really believed their drivel about carbon emissions then we could solve all the world's carbon emissions in 10 years by going nuclear. And at a fraction - a tiny fraction - of the cost of all the solar, wind, biomass - you name it - bullshit. But none of them will even consider the nuclear solution which proves how little they really care about the environment and how much they really care about income redistribution.