Gisele Bundchen

[mustardman]

Parsley are you saying Billy O'Reilly got fleas from Fox news.

[parsley]

You are a little confused.

[Burbert]

Bill O, is not only a fool, but a tool for the us propogandi machine. He gets paid by the us gov't to spew the garbage that he reports each night. Remember, the us is at war, with terror, drugs, gangs, fraud, Kanadi, bugs, slugs, dumpers, poutain, chinee, i ran, etc, etc. Fear is everywhere. Remember duds, if you ain't wit us u's agin us. Shout first ask questions later!

[Fransisco]

Oh yeah, and the CBC is funded by...

[cottonpicken]

LOL!-good one burbert

I read somewhere i ran's economy is the size of detroit's.Something to be REAL scared of.

[FarmRanger]

If Detroit was run by a dictator who’s primary goal was to use the economy of Detroit to destroy a neighbouring city through the development of nuclear weapons, then yes cotton, that would something to fear.

A little like a lone street punk, not a very serious threat until he’s packing an Uzi in a crowded market.

How many of Bill O’Reilly’s detractors have actually watched his show? I thought so.
Its a lot easier to attack someone else’s character, than defend your own ideology.

[jensend]

we occasionally catch part of o'reilly. my sixteen year old asked the one time how anybody could be so stupid. i had to admit it's a mystery to me too. o'reilly likes to offer solutions that sound so simple and straightforward but if you look beneath the surface these solutions could never be implemented now because we've moved on from the 1960's. it would be like trying to take grainfarming back to half and half and the only spray you had was 2,4-d. it just wouldn't deal with all the problems.

[FarmRanger]

Translation in brackets:
we occasionally catch part of o'reilly.(which makes me an authority)

my sixteen year old asked the one time how anybody could be so stupid.
(and if a 16 year-old can see it, then you must be really stupid not to see it)

i had to admit it's a mystery to me too. (I was happy the apple didn’t fall far from the tree)

o'reilly likes to offer solutions that sound so simple and straightforward but if you look beneath the surface (If something sounds reasonable, but it comes from someone who I don’t like, then there must be something beneath the surface)

these solutions could never be implemented now because we've moved on from the 1960's. (We live in oppositeland now)

it would be like trying to take grainfarming back to half and half and the only spray you had was 2,4-d. it just wouldn't deal with all the problems. (How's that again?)

[jensend]

imagine trying to implement o'reilly's solutions. round up all the illegals and deport them. sounds good but it logisitically couldn't be done and big business wants the labour provided by the illegals, anyway. war with iraq - bomb it back to the stone age. fine but then there will be a billion more terrorists and american business couldn't operate beyond american borders. iran - nuke it. that speaks for itself. have a good day but watch out for the complicated parts. my sixteen year old may very well have done more travelling than you. you should get out a little more and see the world with an open mind but then you might have to think how other parts of the world seem to get along even though they do things differently. i used to be a big fan of the usa until i saw some other parts of the world and saw it can be done differently. fox noise soothes the mind of the non-thinker. did you hear about o'reilly's producer a few years ago. she sued him for making her the object of his phone sex calls against her will. great guy alright.

[jensend]

here try this one to find out how smart o'reilly is. he couldn't stick with any reputable media.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris1.html