• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

this seed thing is just bad ,bad bad,

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Unfortunately, I think that just about nails it sawfly

    Comment


      #12
      ....take off your tinfoil hats. Don't you trust "them" to treat you fair?

      They've gained full control of the canola seed market, "without" UPOV91 (Unlimited Pricing Opportunity Victory 91)

      Comment


        #13
        If its too expensive, another business model will emerge. Always has, always will.

        Comment


          #14
          every one ends up paying more for forever
          than a one time cost to the govt. and farmer.
          under the new system , the only
          benefactor is the seed patent holder.

          with ultimately the consumer and farmer paying a tax forever.

          that is a sick world

          Comment


            #15
            "Rolling around in the word innovation". A huge part of any farm's success can be using innovation.

            In our case, reducing tillage, fertilizer placement, guidance, tissue testing and split app, fungicide use, etc are all examples I rate as innovation with big roi. When I think about seed, outside of input trait GMOs, innovation in the seed business hasn't given us the the same growth.

            I think of it in terms of risk. Promises in quality or end use specs (by new varieties) can be wiped out in one untimely weather event. So, I end up buying a new variety, pay royalties with the promises of improved whatever, but, I carry ALL the risk.

            Is this where end point royalties would make sense? Quality, or yield, delivered as promised, royalty paid. Variety doesn't deliver on guarantee, no royalty. I don't think this is the intent but would be an interesting twist to share risk.

            Comment


              #16
              I do like Parsley's suggestion re saving some traditional seed.

              I always like a contingency plan, and hate being held captive.

              Comment


                #17
                To my earlier post, we always have choices. We don't have to grow what they're selling.

                Also, how much different is UPOV91 from the PBR royalties we already pay?

                Comment


                  #18
                  Now there is a interesting twist.

                  If you can get a quality guarantee that would be worth something... Good luck though.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    I watched alot of number one durum downgraded to a 5 even after all the sprayer passes.

                    Mother nature rules.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Wow tweety you live in a world of your own. Another business model will emerg FM when once you loose something have farmers ever got value back. Once it's gone were F$&krd. Plain and simple.
                      Canola proves it those that don't realize are mostly newbys to the canola game. Now we get 60 once in a while before we got 50 once in a while. Both will give 12 if turn hot before and new super varieties.
                      Only thing different they deregulated all others before and now U.S. farmers are F$&ked.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...