• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Cliven Bundy

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sawfly
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2005
    • 876

    #41
    another thing
    i do not know for sure.
    if the law applies the same

    but what if the free trade agreement
    would prevent us from ever getting back into public breeding.

    same reason we could not nationalize the railway or any industry, without being sued for commercial damage compensation .

    if we were to do public breeding again .

    the gov. can be sued for the seed co.s lost revenue and potential revenue .

    if you look at canola
    what kind of potential revenue is at stake here.

    billions

    that might explain why Harper is so quick to kill Gov. breeding.

    i get so sick of Mulroney and Harper selling out our sovereignty.
    to corporate friends

    Comment

    • bucket
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2008
      • 17035

      #42
      That's the part the conservatives will say "...but we didn't know..."

      Because they don't understand the term "due diligence".

      Comment

      • bucket
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2008
        • 17035

        #43
        Canada would be better served with people that stood up for our interests rather than always using terms like " well this is what it takes to belong"

        This country needs to grow up, and start influencing the rest of the world with what made Canada a successfull country.

        It wasn't by following the herd.

        We are a young country and if you compare it to junior coming home to farm, sometimes its better to let junior try out the ideas. It has made alot of good farms better.

        I don't like other countries dictating what happens here for their own benefit.

        NAFTA helped but no one knows how much it has tied our hands either.

        If the rest of the free trade agreements come on line we are still not prepared to meet the demands anyway.

        Canada has to start looking inside itself and work on its internal problems.

        Comment

        • wd9
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2000
          • 3196

          #44
          Sawfly, what do you want to see? If not
          royalties, how do you generate the
          millions required to breed new varieties
          and traits? should the gov pay for it
          all? What is the farmers responsibility
          to pay and how much?

          An Act is just an Act, but a sound
          business model with advancement in
          cereals development, isn't that the real
          endgame?

          Please, i'm not a seed grower, work for
          monsanto, in government, don't profit
          from seed in any way so please don't go
          there. Just a farmer who wants access to
          and wants to see new and better cereal
          varieties.

          Comment

          • grower99
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2011
            • 224

            #45
            At what cost is accessing these new
            "super" varieties ok with you? If the
            cost and contract conditions are too one
            sided what other options will you have in
            5,10,15 years?

            Comment

            • wd9
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2000
              • 3196

              #46
              It greatly concerns me that the trend is to cower in the corner from
              fear of seed companies and royalties yet not a post on farmers'
              perfect timing opportunity right now to own and control a big chunk
              of cereal breeding in Canada.

              It shows to me farmer owned breeding won't work in Canada rather
              then using the advantages within UPOV91 to create a strong farmer
              owned breeding program for cereals - with no EPR!

              And yes, it works in other counties, but in Canada, probably not.

              Comment

              • bucket
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2008
                • 17035

                #47
                It works in other countries where they have trouble meeting their own needs.

                When you are exporting country like Canada and your importing costomers can set the rules as to what enters their country, it may be a little more difficult.

                Any excuse will do.

                We have witnessed it already.

                Comment

                • grower99
                  Senior Member
                  • Nov 2011
                  • 224

                  #48
                  What steps are needed to establish a
                  farmer owned and controlled breeding
                  program in a political environment which
                  is being tipped in favour of a few
                  corporations?

                  Comment

                  • charliep
                    Senior Member
                    • Oct 2000
                    • 9002

                    #49
                    I found this article in Alberta Farm Express interesting.

                    [URL="http://www.albertafarmexpress.ca/2014/04/09/big-changes-coming-to-plant-breeding/"]Alberta Farm Express[/URL]

                    For what it is worth, the debate goes well beyond UPOV91 (an international standard) to how plant breeding will be financed in western Canada and who will do this activity. These questions have already been dealt with in the cases of canola and pulses.

                    Comment

                    • wd9
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2000
                      • 3196

                      #50
                      funny, i was gonna post that!

                      bucket, re "it works in other countries"

                      What does that have to do with seed,
                      unless i am misunderstanding you, that
                      is about exports??

                      What protects the private sector seed
                      rights also applies to farmer owned.
                      Where is the corporate advantage? Or the
                      farmers seed ownership disadvantage?

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...