• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Court challenge

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hopperbin
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2007
    • 6562

    #11
    And if the judge rules the wrong way as far as I am conserned his car should be plastered with eggs so bad that he or she needs to wipe the windows.

    Comment

    • sddickson
      Member
      • Oct 2011
      • 87

      #12
      If the judge rules the wrong way, how long could this delay our open market ?

      Comment

      • parsley
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2000
        • 10986

        #13
        (j) to act as agent for or on behalf of any minister
        or agent of Her Majesty in right of Canada in
        respect of any operations that it may be directed
        to carry out by the Governor in Council; and

        Comment

        • parsley
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2000
          • 10986

          #14
          Directions to the Corporation
          18. (1) The Governor in Council may, by order,
          direct the Corporation with respect to the manner
          in which any of its operations, powers and duties
          under this Act shall be conducted, exercised or
          performed.
          Directors
          (1.1) The directors shall cause the directions to
          be implemented and, in so far as they act in
          accordance with section 3.12, they are not
          accountable for any consequences arising from
          the implementation of the directions.
          Best interests
          (1.2) Compliance by the Corporation with
          directions is deemed to be in the best interests of
          the Corporation.

          Comment

          • boarderbloke
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2007
            • 1991

            #15
            Could court delays alter Aug 2012 freedom day?

            Comment

            • parsley
              Senior Member
              • Oct 2000
              • 10986

              #16
              Hopper, maybe a few hundred signed letters to
              the court, asking for the judges resignation from
              the bench IF he hasn't read the Minister's rights,
              which I posted above, should help prevent a
              renegade judge from getting promoted to a
              higher bench. At the least. Pars.

              Comment

              • Hopperbin
                Senior Member
                • Dec 2007
                • 6562

                #17
                Go hard Pars I got a farm audit in the morning.

                Comment

                • dmlfarmer
                  Senior Member
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 1814

                  #18
                  However, the Interpretation Act, which deals with amending and repealing statutes says an ammendment to an Act cannot change the intent of the existing ACT: "...except in so far as the provision is inconsistent with the intent and object of such Act, or the interpretation which such provision would give to any word, expression or clause is inconsistent with the context..."
                  If the judge believes the amendments made are at odds with the Intent of the the original CWB Act he has no choice but to rule against the government tommorrow.

                  Comment

                  • Tom4Wildrose
                    Senior Member
                    • Oct 2011
                    • 175

                    #19
                    DML,

                    It would be a consitutional crisis if one Parliament can bind the next parliament from passing legislation.

                    A 100 percent approval or consensus vote against a particular Legislative Act could easily be enacted... stopping future changes to Statutes.

                    This would bring Parliament and the democratic system into disrepute if your view were enforced by the courts.

                    Comment

                    • haveapulse
                      Senior Member
                      • Dec 2005
                      • 374

                      #20
                      Seems appropriate for this to be in Winnipeg; same place where the Hudsons Bay Fur Monopoly was upheld and overturned in the same day. The judge ruled: guilty of illegally trading furs in the then monopoly trading district controled by the HBC. Guillaume Sayer, had broken the law; the rule of day meant the monopoly was broken. From day forward the law remained but the trade was open.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...