How much triffid is there in organic flax?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Regulation, Procedures, and Rules for Triffid
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
"Contamination worse than feared in German dioxin scandal
Post a commentBy Rory Harrington, 06-Jan-2011
Related topics: Food Alerts
German authorities have said up to 3,000 tonnes of dioxin-contaminated animal feed additive may have been sold – almost six times more than previously estimated - as more details about the crisis emerged yesterday.
Officials had earlier estimated that 527 tonnes of the additive, which is believed to have been tainted with industrial fats containing the toxic chemical, have been delivered to hen, poultry and pig farms in Germany.
A spokesperson for EU Commissioner for Health and Consumer Policy John Dalli told the BBC it was "too early" to consider a ban on exports.
Contaminated eggs
The alarm was raised last week when eggs and meat containing trace amounts of dioxin were discovered. Dioxin is a poisonous chemical, linked to the development of cancer in humans.
Some 136,000 contaminated eggs have been exported to the Netherlands that could have been used as ingredients in processed food such as mayonnaise, it was revealed yesterday. However, German agriculture ministry spokesman Holger Eichele said it was not aware of exports to any other EU nations.
The news came as police in Germany carried out searches Wednesday at Harles and Jentzsch, feed producer at the centre of incident, the farm in Schleswig-Holstein that produced the fat, and a subsidiary in Lower Saxony.
Harles and Jentzsch sold the fat to 25 German feed manufacturers although it currently appears that no feed was sold to firms abroad.
So far more than 1,100 farms in Germany have been shut as a result of the crisis, most in Lower Saxony, and some 8,000 hens culled.
The European Union has demanded an explanation for the cause of the contamination and there have been calls within Germany for stricter industry regulation and tougher penalties against offenders.
The UK Food Standards Agency said there was no evidence to suggest that potentially contaminated animal feed, or food from the animals that may have eaten the feed, had entered the UK.
Should this conduct be treated like flax was?
Infractions will happen all the time, and does, particularly as we start to buy more and more food from China!
Questions to ask yourself:
1. Should the there be repercussions?
2. Should compliance be enforced
3. Should there be penalty for non-compliance?
What is responsibility? Do we want responsibility built into the system when it comes for food. I note some want to avoid all responsibility. Pars
Comment
-
"Maybe those organizations have a strategic plan, an execution strategy and ways of measuring/demonstrating success."
charliep, I like when you have sport with me, making me repeat myself. LOL
Of course they do. It's called tax dollars from the public purse, that become available in larger amounts when "producer support" aka checkoffs, become headlines and thereby legitimize governments to dole out largesse.
"They have worked with government as a supply chain to deal with issues like regualation, procedures and rules .."
Oh let me recall this one, lol, hm, ...could this mean heavy duty lobbying? could this mean compulsory checkoffing pending, but hiding under government blankies? Could this mean providing patents with no ownwership responsibilities?
How about quiet gentlemen-agreement government regs(We'll look the other way if it goes south)?
Are barley biotech planners copying the same regs, procedures and rules for barley, that were used for flax?
Worked well for industry's Christams gift. Tom cwb handed them some profit from a bin of flax.
The CEO of the Flax Council must have licked his finger and it stuck to stuck to page Page 1 Contents of "How to Ship Flax to EU According to Regulations" because he never got to page 2.
Btw, charlie p, did you know that "demonstrating success" doens't necessarily have anything to do with developing food you'd wactually ant your family to eat?
That's somebody playing tricks on you. LOL Pars
Comment
-
No certified organic flax sales can be transacted unless the flax has been tested at a certified lab, a new regulation that was adopted by organics. If it doesn't pass for Triffid-free, or any all of the other certification requirements, it is then downgraded to soley selling at conventional grain prices.
Organics have used inspected cleaners and registered seed growers occassionally, but have become particularly cautious.
Some areas that have been deemed Triffid contaminated areas because of positive test results, are less likely to attract organics looking to get grain cleaned or organics looking to buy seed from any of the contaminated area's pedigreed seed growers.
Negative, certified tests must accompany flax export documentation.
As you well know, all trucks, yes all of them, were required to wash out their trailers before grain was loaded and the manifest signed by both trucker and producer; occassionally looked upon by commercial truckers as a bit fanatic., but always accomodated politely.
It was prudent.
Testing is done at various labs in NA, at the growers choice. Grain samples are often sent to buyers prior to a sale. International labs have worked with organic growers for years, as falling numbers had to accompany most milling wheat sales.
However, I am sure you are not interested the fine details of organic testing protocol. If you are, I suggest you google certified organic certification requirements. Parsley
Comment
-
Choose one of the many certification bodies available that you wish to examine. Some are provincial, some national, some are international. You might want to view both certification and accreditation that pertains to your selection. And then there is also national legislation pertaining to organics. All three work together. Pars
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment