NFU crazy, or am I missing something?

[wd9]

What is off topic is SW being elected to the CWB. Speaks volumes BTW. At least in the little tiny circle i know.

[parsley]

1. I responded posted Dec 29, 2010 21:44 to grassy saying: Some drool over the vision there should be a couple of hundred "professional farmers "
I said "some drool".
I did not say gusty drools.
( But since you mentioned it......I wonder.....)

2. In response to jensend, posted Dec 30, 2010 11:33, ". I've read some of your comments about Klause and have concluded there are a lot of mean spirited roosters resentfull of the chicks breathing down your ruffled feathers"
Nothing that indicates this comment was directed at you gusty. fyreference, it wasn't.

3. I will admit to bias for Toronto chickens farmers though. LOL My daughter has a designer chicken coop with real hens laying eggs every day in her back yard overlooking the park. Are you claiming she is not a farmer? LOLOLOLOLOL.

4. 10K gross has already been decided. Get over it,

5. You should know by now, I will have a writing block only the moment after you have a cropgrowing block. LOL

6. I didn't mix up my posts, gusty. Regretfully, you mixed up the Chair's reasoning/diplomacy from the getgo-Topic. Pars

[grassfarmer]

The impressiveness of "biggness" is such an Alberta redneck hang-up shaney. The cattle feeding industry is a prime example. Can Fax Trends profit/loss data from 1979-2002 shows an average net loss over that 20 year period of $4.85 per animal. Maybe we should consider net profit rather than gross output before deciding who is or isn't a farmer?

[parsley]

And you are correct about 21:44 gusty, I went back and re-read, and I am wrong... it was in response to your post. But I did say "some".

Chalk it up to the part of the novel that I am presently writing that has me distracted....... lol Pars

[parsley]

And you are correct about 21:44 gusty, I went back and re-read, and I am wrong... it was in response to your post. But I did say "some".

Chalk it up to the part of the novel that I am presently writing that has me distracted....... lol Pars

[parsley]

And you are correct about 21:44 gusty, I went back and re-read, and I am wrong... it was in response to your post. But I did say "some".

Chalk it up to the part of the novel that I am presently writing that has me distracted....... lol Pars

[parsley]

And you are correct about 21:44 gusty, I went back and re-read, and I am wrong... it was in response to your post. But I did say "some".

Chalk it up to the part of the novel that I am presently writing that has me distracted....... lol Pars

[parsley]

wd, I'll give you a 9/10 for that rebut.

But, you really can't expect me to swallow most of today's science, do you, because if I say yes, I'll for sure have to accept a certain farm organization scientifically gauged 'crazy' at some point down the road. LOL Pars.