Tom,
I do not consider ANY producer group as a 3rd party interference in the CWB.
In fact, I would encourage each and every local farmers' marketing group, even canola groups, organic groups, export groups, oats groups,etc to post, to write, to explain, to interview, to contribute in how the CWB affects their livlilhood.
A legislatated CWB institution had huge impacts on all kinds of farmers and companies.
Decency should underwrite the focus.
The more farmers who become involved in overseeing, recommending to, contributing to, or participating in their organization's point of view, THE BETTER!
In fact, I would go so far to say that it is apathy that breeds financial ill for farmers.
That being said, the CWB itself should not participate because they spend money from all farmers to fund their voice. A voice, I believe, that represents their paid hacks, more than represents farmer Joe.
They need to recluse themselves when an election is ongoing.
Pars
I do not consider ANY producer group as a 3rd party interference in the CWB.
In fact, I would encourage each and every local farmers' marketing group, even canola groups, organic groups, export groups, oats groups,etc to post, to write, to explain, to interview, to contribute in how the CWB affects their livlilhood.
A legislatated CWB institution had huge impacts on all kinds of farmers and companies.
Decency should underwrite the focus.
The more farmers who become involved in overseeing, recommending to, contributing to, or participating in their organization's point of view, THE BETTER!
In fact, I would go so far to say that it is apathy that breeds financial ill for farmers.
That being said, the CWB itself should not participate because they spend money from all farmers to fund their voice. A voice, I believe, that represents their paid hacks, more than represents farmer Joe.
They need to recluse themselves when an election is ongoing.
Pars
Comment