This website uses tracking tools, including cookies. We use these technologies for a variety of
reasons, including to recognize new and past website users, to customize your experience, perform
analytics and deliver personalized advertising on our sites, apps and newsletters and across the
Internet based on your interests.
You agree to our and by clicking I agree.
You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.
Segregation of GM/Non-GM
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
<p></p>
<p class="EC_style8ptBK"><strong><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aT1kD1GOt0N0">(Is this Bloomberg's article similar to Triffid contamination?)</a></strong></p>
From what I have read, but not looked at closely, Riceland Foods and Producers Rice Mill were being eyed up to be sued by British and German food processors with $1 billion losses being thrown around.
You know. Recalls. Shipment refunds.And you well know how court costs will multiply like Triffid.
Do producer co-ops have enough money to pay for every Crossed Events gone bad? A little billion dollar something called an unintended consequence?
Gene markers ARE legally identifiable.
Should {all flax producers} ONLY, be responsible, as seems to be the case case of Triffid? What about Triffid recalls? Triffid product EU refused. Lost EU business. EU recalls.Is this the Canadian flax producers' fault and responsibility AND LIABILITY?
As I asked before, who is responsible?
It's difficult isn't it? Especially when some of the industry players, and even FELLOW FARMERS would leave you hang out to dry in a New York minute.
Comment