STUDY: Satellites Show No Acceleration In Global Warming For 23 Years

Commodity Marketing

Tools

STUDY: Satellites Show No Acceleration In Global Warming For 23 Years

Nov 29, 2017 | 17:39 1 http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/29/st...-for-23-years/

When are "data deniers" finally going to accept,,,and celebrate the science, which is showing every week, that "warm monger scientists" are frauds and are only out to enrich themselves?
There is NO global warming. Reply With Quote
SASKFARMER3's Avatar Nov 29, 2017 | 17:48 2 Wait wait wait, chunky will say the satellites are controlled by the USA and can't be trusted or some other bull shit thing.

Nothing is different Reply With Quote
Nov 29, 2017 | 17:50 3 Yet the bullshit goes on in the libtard world of rainbows unicorns and crocodile tears. Reply With Quote
Nov 29, 2017 | 17:55 4 cause most of them are stoned Reply With Quote
Nov 29, 2017 | 18:03 5
Quote Originally Posted by danny W1M View Post
http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/29/st...-for-23-years/

When are "data deniers" finally going to accept,,,and celebrate the science, which is showing every week, that "warm monger scientists" are frauds and are only out to enrich themselves?
There is NO global warming.
Hey, read the article again and pay close attention to the statement "virtually no change in the rate of warming since the early 1990s." It does not say that global temperature is constant. It does not say there is cooling. In fact it does not say there is no global warming. Rather the study concludes there has been no acceleration in global warming. In other words this one study found there is warming happening but the rate of warming has not accelerated in the last 23 years. Reply With Quote
Nov 29, 2017 | 18:20 6 And I counter your study with the one just out of the University of Alaska and China that found there is little temperature data from the artic regions because of a lack of observations and data. These researchers collected actual temperature readings from the artic. With this additional data found warming has continued at a much faster rate than what previous studies have found. Which is to be expected since the impact of global warming is greater in the artic than in mid latitudes. I took the time to read article you posted. I wonder if you will consider the article about the Alaska study:
http://www.rcinet.ca/en/2017/11/21/a...warming-study/ Reply With Quote
Nov 29, 2017 | 18:39 7
Quote Originally Posted by dmlfarmer View Post
Hey, read the article again and pay close attention to the statement "virtually no change in the rate of warming since the early 1990s." It does not say that global temperature is constant. It does not say there is cooling. In fact it does not say there is no global warming. Rather the study concludes there has been no acceleration in global warming. In other words this one study found there is warming happening but the rate of warming has not accelerated in the last 23 years.
Today a scientist on CBC was trying to explain how we came from the glacial age to today. Admitted that world has been warming since ice age. He also alluded to the earth orbital changes that warmed the north. He sounded very unsure of himself. Reply With Quote
Nov 29, 2017 | 19:21 8 Dirty Mexican Lemonade farmer or dml farmer nobody says that the earth isn't warming it has and will continue to warm until we enter into a cooling period known as an ice age. As it stands we are still warming from the last ice age so there is no reason to panic as this is naturally occurring and there is no need to tax ourselves into the poorhouse because of it. Btw dml I googled what dml means and it turns out you are one sick puppy kinda like most leftards today. Reply With Quote
Nov 29, 2017 | 22:34 9 https://weather.com/news/weather/new...es-in-november Reply With Quote
Nov 30, 2017 | 00:01 10 Weather not climate

You might want to check out this study published in August of this year. http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full...LI-D-16-0768.1
Basically it calls into question satellite temperature data. The findings of this study was global warming is actually 30% higher than indicated by traditional satellite data. If you want a quick layman's overview of the study read https://insideclimatenews.org/news/0...am-peer-review

Brings into question the satellite study you quote.

I do have to admit it has been reported that there were 58 scientific papers published in 2017 claiming global warming is a myth. Or were there? I suggest checking out https://www.snopes.com/scientific-pa...-warming-myth/
to see just how many of these 58 papers actually denied global warming before you post any more fake news studies. Reply With Quote
Nov 30, 2017 | 01:50 11
Quote Originally Posted by dmlfarmer View Post
Hey, read the article again and pay close attention to the statement "virtually no change in the rate of warming since the early 1990s." It does not say that global temperature is constant. It does not say there is cooling. In fact it does not say there is no global warming. Rather the study concludes there has been no acceleration in global warming. In other words this one study found there is warming happening but the rate of warming has not accelerated in the last 23 years.
Thanks for pointing out the vital word acceleration. However, according to all of the models, there was supposed to be acceleration during this period. Which is why the models are getting progressively further from the reality. In the meantime, lets just be grateful it is still warming, however modest it may be, still preferable to the alternative. Reply With Quote
Nov 30, 2017 | 07:14 12 oh no , danny , thats only called weather , the libtard leftards said ,unless its to hot , then its called climate and global warming Reply With Quote
Nov 30, 2017 | 08:53 13 I wonder of Trudeau can do the math on keeping an ice plant working in front of the Parliament buildings and it's downstream carbon footprint.....moron. Reply With Quote
Nov 30, 2017 | 08:58 14 Minus 69 degrees, where are these hot-air heads ehen you need them? Reply With Quote
fjlip's Avatar Nov 30, 2017 | 10:52 15
Quote Originally Posted by caseih View Post
oh no , danny , thats only called weather , the libtard leftards said ,unless its to hot , then its called climate and global warming
Selective data manipulation...as we see everywhere, every politically correct angle. They have the answers they want and make up the questions after. I've said many times, to believe all the temperature data for the WORLD is a stretch. There is so much potential errors/manipulation that it is ridiculous! Reply With Quote
Nov 30, 2017 | 11:05 16 This article on sea level measurement illustrates how complicated accurate world data collection can be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_level

Take note of the first graph on the right side.Nice progressive line showing 2 cm/yr. But look closely at the tops and bottoms of the graph.

They used Tide Gauges for centuries that were there for everyone to see but recently only satellite.

Check the problems with satellite calibration against tide gauges. Reply With Quote
Nov 30, 2017 | 11:19 17 One Conservative MP voted against the Paris accord in June of this year. Nobody is listening to human caused climate change deniers. Nobody is listening I repeat. You have lost the argument. Move on. Reply With Quote
Nov 30, 2017 | 11:46 18
Quote Originally Posted by chuckChuck View Post
One Conservative MP voted against the Paris accord in June of this year. Nobody is listening to human caused climate change deniers. Nobody is listening I repeat. You have lost the argument. Move on.
Hey chucky, nice to see you hanging out in this discussion!

Only thing is, if the debate is lost, why the heck are you spending time here? Seems like you're wasting your time - unless you aren't really convinced of your position.

Just a sliver of doubt there ch8ucky, LOL? Well there should be! Reply With Quote
fjlip's Avatar Nov 30, 2017 | 12:34 19
Quote Originally Posted by chuckChuck View Post
One Conservative MP voted against the Paris accord in June of this year. Nobody is listening to human caused climate change deniers. Nobody is listening I repeat. You have lost the argument. Move on.
Figures only ONE not a lemming, the whole world once thought it was flat, till ONE guy figured it out.
The bigger the lie.... Reply With Quote
Nov 30, 2017 | 12:39 20
Quote Originally Posted by chuckChuck View Post
One Conservative MP voted against the Paris accord in June of this year. Nobody is listening to human caused climate change deniers. Nobody is listening I repeat. You have lost the argument. Move on.
because 99% of the pigs are wallowing in the trough Reply With Quote
Nov 30, 2017 | 15:04 21
Quote Originally Posted by caseih View Post
because 99% of the pigs are wallowing in the trough
If we could figure our an angle and there was room in the trough, we might wallow too. LOL Research, laboratory and stats jobs for immigrants, it seems to me, listening to CBC. Reply With Quote