• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Green energy is dumb

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Green energy is dumb

    Look up ITER and DEMO.


    THERE YA GO CHUCKY I fixed your energy problem for ya!!

    #2
    Originally posted by Klause View Post
    Look up ITER and DEMO.


    THERE YA GO CHUCKY I fixed your energy problem for ya!!
    Wow. Not a single response.

    Where's all the green energy loving people?


    Fusion reaction... commercial scale Tokomak reactors.


    Iter will use 50MW to power up and produce 500MW.

    Inside a magnetic containment vessel.... All the benefits of a compact nuclear power plant without any of the dangers, radioactivity, or waste...


    Why spend billions of taxpayer money on wind and solar when this is around the corner?

    Comment


      #3
      Also noteworthy, the USA is involved, yet Canada is absent...

      Comment


        #4
        Does after 2050 mean just around the corner?

        [URL="http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-40558758"]http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-40558758[/URL]

        So back to the windmills apparently

        Comment


          #5
          FYI... The only Canadian TOKOMAK... is here in Saskatchewan:
          [URL="http://plasma.usask.ca/"]http://plasma.usask.ca/[/URL]

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by tweety View Post
            Does after 2050 mean just around the corner?

            [URL="http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-40558758"]http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-40558758[/URL]

            So back to the windmills apparently


            Let's throw 20 billion more at Fusion. and quit building windmills... It's almost 2020... 40 years till we have limitless power...

            Or we can cause the next 3 generations to be in debt for no reason... and use up a bunch of rare earth resources for nothing.

            We're shutting down power plants before their EoL and replacing them with un-stable, and non-sustainable "green" energy that's going to bankrupt us... Hmmmm....

            Comment


              #7
              Nothing but crickets. The truth comes out klause the lefties only want to tax us they know man made climate change is a hoax.

              Comment


                #8
                This green BS, the Paris Accord, carbon tax and all the wasted resources building windmills and solar panels will be derilect and ditched in 10 years.

                Number one- no one has proven that our best friend Carbon, the backbone of all organic things and food creating processes, is the nemisis of the world, and no one can give any assurance at all the the Western World can do one iota to slow down an obscure and non-specific "problem" (or maybe not a problem at all.)

                All that will happen with this green blunder state, is that western wealth and our taxes will be wasted. Klause, good on you for posting this alternative but really, do we need an alternative for something that is not a problem at all. On the other hand, 33 years is a very short time, basically 1 farming career. In that time there will be lots of innovations and I suppose that can't be all bad.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by sumdumguy View Post
                  This green BS, the Paris Accord, carbon tax and all the wasted resources building windmills and solar panels will be derilect and ditched in 10 years.

                  Number one- no one has proven that our best friend Carbon, the backbone of all organic things and food creating processes, is the nemisis of the world, and no one can give any assurance at all the the Western World can do one iota to slow down an obscure and non-specific "problem" (or maybe not a problem at all.)

                  All that will happen with this green blunder state, is that western wealth and our taxes will be wasted. Klause, good on you for posting this alternative but really, do we need an alternative for something that is not a problem at all. On the other hand, 33 years is a very short time, basically 1 farming career. In that time there will be lots of innovations and I suppose that can't be all bad.
                  Farming career only sposed to be 33 years ?? Wtf ? Lol

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Sitting in great falls at the truck stop running some basic math. Trying to figure out what it would take to make an all electric truck fleet possible.

                    If we say the average truck north of 49 in the prairies is running about 900km/day @ 5mpg average we get 508.15L of fuel consumption per day. Wiki tells me diesel fuel contains 38.6MJ/L and a large diesel engine is somewhere around 45% efficient. That means 8826.56MJ is actually needed to punch a truck down the road for the day if it was 100% efficient. If we assume we could power the truck with an electric motor that is ~95% efficient we would then need 9291.12MJ per day to punch the electric truck down the road.

                    Now if we convert that to kilowatt hours, 1KwH=3.6MJ, so we'd need a 2580.88KwH battery. Just like you don't run your diesel tanks to empty at the end of the day and try to keep a reasonable cushion of a couple hundred liters, let's say we rig this truck with a 3000KwH battery. On the HIGH side, wiki says Li-ion packs .265KwH/kg. So the battery pack would weigh 11,321kg in lithium ion alone for a 3000KwH battery.

                    Now here's where things start to get Ugly... if we knock the fuel off the truck that gains us 500kg in payload, but the battery Costs us 11,321kg, so nets out at 10,821kg. I won't even discuss the added weight from additional axles and tires just to support this extra weight. Regardless, we've lost 10.821mT of payload, or nearly 25% for a Canadian super b.

                    At the end of the day we have to charge these things up over 8Hrs which is the mandatory daily reset. So if we assume absolutely 100% efficiency in charge and discharge then we just have to replenish the 2580KW over 8 hours, which would require 322.5KW every hour for 8 hours, or basically a 322.5KVA generator running with its tounge hanging out for 8 straight hours. Put another way, at 240Volts, you will need a 1344amp service to plug that truck into.

                    I'm sitting in a truck stop with probably 100 trucks sitting here, that means a 134,000 amp service so that all these trucks could plug in... at night... when there's seldom much wind blowing... blow this out for all the class 8 trucks that are on the road not only in Canada, but north America.

                    Maybe my assumptions and calculations are way out to lunch, but I just don't see how this is possible on renewables! Or how we are going to be able to source the shear quantity of precious metals needed... not just for the batteries, but the windmills and solar cells.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by tweety View Post
                      Does after 2050 mean just around the corner?

                      [URL="http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-40558758"]http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-40558758[/URL]

                      So back to the windmills apparently
                      Perhaps if we put as much emphasis and capital into this as we do into the other alternative energy types, it wouldn't take until 2050. Look how fast the atomic bomb was developed when the resources were thrown at it.

                      But until the friends of politicians have positioned themselves to make a fortune from this, they will stick with solar and wind while government subsidies are still making them a fortune. If these governments really thought that CO2 is causing all of the calamities it is claimed to, they would have already put their resources into a project such as this which has a real possibility of replacing a large portion of fossil fuels, at least for electric generation.
                      Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Nov 10, 2017, 01:43.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Replace electric trucks with a more efficient way of hauling bulk products. ....it's called a railway for **** sakes....


                        Trucks that are hauling 500 plus kms a day to deliver grain anywhere is retarded.....


                        Everyone has been hypnotized by the railways leaders like a cult that they are doing their very best....they are not and it's time for another railway.....

                        What's the reason for Bison trucks with double vans on the the number one highway.....they are either Winnipeg to Calgary or Regina to Calgary .....either way that's rail traffic. ...


                        It was the railways that created the trucking industry by their lack of willingness to do anything.....
                        Last edited by bucket; Nov 10, 2017, 09:26.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Seems so simple, Bucket' but every politician out there has allowed the rails to take out which ever branch lines they want and close every yard to any extra car loading. 110 cars or nothing.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            I'm not sure how this makes green energy dumb. That is like someone saying in the 1980s that we should stop building roads because everyone will have flying cars in the future.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              I say this because everyone greenie correlates reduction in ghg to the number of cars off the road....

                              Imagine taking 100000 trucks off the road.....

                              And then being able to hop a train from Regina to Calgary instead of driving......

                              How many flights are there Regina to Calgary everyday. ....makes a case for high speed train....might increase Saskatchewan population as well....

                              BTW Saskatchewan quit building roads long ago .....they are having trouble maintaining them....

                              The overpasses at the GTH lead to nowhere. ...

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...
                              X

                              This website uses tracking tools, including cookies. We use these technologies for a variety of reasons, including to recognize new and past website users, to customize your experience, perform analytics and deliver personalized advertising on our sites, apps and newsletters and across the Internet based on your interests.
                              You agree to our and by clicking I agree.